Examples of using Adaptation should in English and their translations into German
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Medicine
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Political
-
Computer
-
Programming
-
Official/political
-
Political
Adaptation should be evolutionary rather than revolutionary.
Contrary to the Commission guidelines for the establishment of the budget, no salary adaptation should be foreseen.
Adaptation should be mainstreamed in all of the EU's external policies.
European research into adaptation climate change impacts and adaptation should be substantially increased.
Adaptation should be carried out on three fronts simultaneously.
Technical developments are constantly taking place in the field of safety systems; machinery for technical adaptation should therefore be established.
Adaptation should be considered in the Strategic Energy Review process.
If an FSH dose increase is deemed appropriate, dose adaptation should preferably be after 7-14 day intervals and preferably by 37.5-75 IU increments.
Adaptation should also figure prominently in the EU budget, in impact assessments and in EU funding.
The implementation of international climate change financing both for mitigation and adaptation should as far as possible build on existing and reformed elements and institutions of the international financial architecture.
CFE Treaty Adaptation should enhance the security of all States in Europe, whether or not they are members of a political military Alliance.
The draft opinion asks for an over-arching European adaptation strategy to be put in place, dealing with planning for all the topics identified in the Green Paper including coast protection, floods and droughts, water resources, fires, public health, agriculture and biodiversity, land-use and infrastructure planning,building and construction etc. Adaptation should also figure prominently in the EU budget, in impact assessments and in EU funding.
Firstly, the policy of adaptation should be added to all Community policies.
This adaptation should not affect the continuation of existing legally founded noise abatement programmes as well as the financial compensation and mitigation schemes that are integral parts of such programmes.
However, focusing on adaptation should not in anyway diminish the importance of mitigation.
Support to adaptation should give priority to the most vulnerable and poor developing countries.
The instruments of this adaptation should be designed so that development gaps between member states be avoided.
This adaptation should also be taken into account in promoting the workers' participation in parish life, apostolic movements, or the formation of specific groups or specialized movements.
In the Commission's opinion, this adaptation should consist of aligning that jurisdiction on the general outline of the Treaty.
Substantial financing for adaptation should be directed primarily to the poorest as well as the most vulnerable countries in the context of the global climate policy framework.
Reporting on progress on adaptation should also be country led via improved National Communications.
The benefits and costs of such adaptation should be clear, and it will be important to understand to what extent a vision of the future is compatible with the current climate impacts and future scenarios for those places.
It also raises the issue of whether planned adaptation should specifically try to target such groups, or apply a distributional analysis to ensure an equitable adaptation strategy.
The priority area Climate Change Adaptation should therefore contribute to adapt to such impacts across populations, economic sectors and regions to ensure a more resilient Union through specific adaptation measures and strategies.
Also in the annual budget, the heading adaptation should appear for the policy areas where immediate investments will be needed e.g. energy, research, agriculture, transport, building standards, natural disaster assistance, biodiversity protection, public health policy, etc.
However the adaptations should cover areas not covered by self-regulation.
Take as a whole, these modifications or adaptations should encourage transparency and a level playing field between private, public and quasi-public entities and make it quite clear that any funding is conditional on a tender and a formal contract.
The experience gained so far during the implementation of the firstgeneration of Action Plans suggests that future adaptations should lead to documents that are more closely calibrated to the partner countries' specific ambitions and capacities, reflecting the differentiated relations of the EU with its partners, whilst also promoting achievable steps towards regulatory convergence with EU legislation and standards.