Examples of using Common statute in English and their translations into German
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Medicine
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Political
-
Computer
-
Programming
-
Official/political
-
Political
If we truly believe and truly want a common statute there should be no transitional system.
A common statute for Members of the European Parliament must finally be established.
I have voted against the Amendment on a common statute for Members of the European Parliament.
A common statute is the only way to approach the present ridiculous system of travel expenses.
In the Amsterdam Treaty under Article 138(4)Parliament is asked to come up with proposals on how a common statute will operate.
A common statute turns us into the EU's representatives in the Member States instead of the countries' representatives in the EU.
I hope I am doing what he would have wanted in recalling threefundamentals that have always underpinned our calls for a common statute.
Mr President, we want the common Statute, but not a demeaning one which will offend our dignity.
They must be given common tools thus far lacking: clearer economic and social rights, simpler procedures, more independent legal resources,genuine common statutes i.e. associations, companies, foundations.
A common statute for the Membersfrom all the Member Statesdoes justice to the ideal of equal pay for equal responsibility.
However, I can state at the outset that my group fully supports the idea of having a common statute for Members andfor putting forward a motion for a resolution containing a proposal for a common statute.
The common Statute is based on the Amsterdam Treaty which has still not entered into force, so this proposal anticipates the ratification of the Treaty by the Member States.
Because adopting the proposal is the onlyway of securing the necessary dialogue with the Council on a common statute, and-because the proposal means that the rules on travel will be changed so that only the travelling expenses actually incurred will be refunded.
At the European Council meeting in Amsterdam, the Heads of Government agreed that Members of the European Parliament would have common, uniform conditions and that Parliament would put forward a proposal on a common statute.
The reasons are very simple: the common Statute would put an end to the provocative inequalities that discriminate between Members.
But what should surprise us most yet has been passed over almost in complete silence, is the fact that for almost twenty years now MEPs- who are electedby universal suffrage as everyone knows- have been waiting in vain for a common statute.
Some of us have fought for years for this common statute, but it was never our aim to sacrifice everything in order to achieve a common statute at any price.
This is why we cannot vote for a resolution which supports Council decisions by qualified majority, the abolition of the veto in the CFSP, that the European Parliament shallhave co-decision power on all budget items and common statutes for all members of the European Parliament etc.
My approach to Rothley is that we need a Common Statute to end discrimination between members from Member State and those from another.
With that rationale, the Bureau of the European Parliament, at the time of Egon Klepsch and with as rapporteurs the then President of the College of Quaestors, the Belgian socialist ErnstGlynn and your present speaker, asked the Council to establish a common statute and proposed to equate MEPs with European judges, as happens in several Member States of the European Union.
By voting against the Members' Statute or'common statute', I rejected calls for a standard level of remuneration, accompanied by low EU tax.
With the Council's agreement, the common Statute ought to be established soon, but even at this late stage there are some things which must be made clear once and for all.
We hope the choice we maketomorrow will be a common choice for a common statute, and that notwithstanding our differing opinions we shall prove that this choice, which is made out of principle, is the right one.
We should reject the proposal for a common statute, as it would guarantee Members from all 25 Member States the same high salary and pension benefits, even though there is absolutely no justification for this.
Quite a few constructive amendments were tabled before the vote, demanding,for example, a common statute for MEPs' assistants and the opportunity for those MEPs who wish to do so to receive back only their actual expenses from as early as 2007.
My second point is that we must carry through to itsconclusion the work already begun on establishing a common statute for Members and, additionally, on clarifying the terms and conditions of employment of our parliamentary assistants, on a basis of transparency and equity and having regard to the dignity of the parliamentary function.