Examples of using Harmonisation could in English and their translations into German
{-}
-
Official
-
Financial
-
Colloquial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Political
-
Computer
-
Programming
-
Official/political
-
Political
Harmonisation could give substantial benefits at reasonable cost.
Mrs Wortmann-Kool's reportalso rightly expresses doubts as to whether full harmonisation could produce different effects to those expected.
Such harmonisation could not be achieved by national means alone.
Improving the efficiency and functioning of the Single Market through better market surveillance andfurther harmonisation could be of major importance for the mechanical and electrical engineering industries, as well as the automotive industry.
Greater harmonisation could be achieved through a series of further specific directives.
Depending on future assessments, possible next areas for harmonisation could include the land and maritime transport sectors as well as addressing TPLL.
Harmonisation could consist of the adoption of a regulation on crowdfunding platforms for financial return, covering, at the very least.
In this way,I believe that we can respond to the fears of those who think that greater harmonisation could lead to downward levelling of consumer protection or entail a step backwards with regard to existing legislation in many Member States.
Harmonisation could be useful for the construction of the European Social Model, however, the social dimension remains to a large extent the preserve of the 27 Member States, in most cases with the full support of the social partners and in line with the principle of subsidiarity.
In particular, such harmonisation could address the following cross-border problems.
Harmonisation could consist of the adoption of a regulation on crowdfunding for financial return, covering, at the very least, flexible regulation of crowdfunding platforms; forms of crowdfunding, services to be provided by crowdfunding platforms; information obligations; exemptions from the scope of application and prohibitions, especially prohibition of the acquisition and publication of related projects, as well as conflicts of interest, financial requirements and a register of platforms to increase transparency.
Hence only a EU-wide harmonisation could avoid disrupting the internal market.
In this way harmonisation could be achieved, and the Community framework of national control systems would be able to work on the basis of operational criteria set up at Community level, following Community control guidelines and acting with the requisite administrative co-operation.
A minimum level of harmonisation could be considered a prerequisite for granting ELMIs an EU passport.
However such harmonisation could be possible in the future if obstacles to the free movement of goods or the freedom to provide services or distorsions of competition arise;
Patent law harmonisation could make it easier for European companies to patent their inventions outside the EU.
It is possible that harmonisation could involve higher taxes in certain countries, which would hit the competitiveness of enterprises.
This lack of harmonisation could result in discrepancies between the SPCs of the originator and the generic product on the same national market.
The absence of harmonisation could result in the appearance of individual national approval systems, resulting in multiple authorisation work and increased administrative burden in the EU.
However, as such harmonisation could lead to a lowering of the level of public health protection, the Community's position is that such recommendations should not be binding.
The variant of optional harmonisation could imply higher costs for national administrations than full harmonisation, since they could be expected to maintain national procedures to some extent.
Harmonisation could consist of the adoption of a regulation on crowdfunding for financial return, covering, at the very least, flexible regulation of crowdfunding platforms; forms of crowdfunding, services to be provided by crowdfunding platforms; caps on amounts per investor and platform; information obligations; exemptions from the scope of application and prohibitions, especially prohibition of the acquisition and publication of related projects, as well as conflicts of interest, financial requirements and a register of platforms to increase transparency.
Further harmonisation can be developed in greater detail in the implementing legislation.
This harmonisation cannot be brought about by the Member States acting alone.
However, harmonisation can also be a step towards a European Foundation and vice versa.
The combination of minimum and full harmonisation can become an option that is acceptable for everyone.
This harmonisation can only be implemented by a separate, independent body, which the Treaty requires to be established as an Agency.
Such harmonisation can only take place if there is a clear awareness of the measures which have already been carried out by the Member States and the EU.
Whereas differences in test methods andclassification systems for reaction to fire between Member States mean that harmonisation can take place only through the adoption of a single system for classification, based on agreed test methods, to be used throughout the Community;
On the whole, though, one has to be honest and say that harmonisation, Mr Schmitt's chosen approach, is entirely in line with our thinking, for,at the end of the day, harmonisation can be an overall goal for the European Union, no matter in what area.