Examples of using Merge commit in English and their translations into German
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Medicine
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Political
-
Computer
-
Programming
-
Official/political
-
Political
This process often results in a merge commit.
But, when working with merge commits, things get a little more complicated.
The~ character will always follow the first parent of a merge commit.
If you're only interested in the merge commits, you can use the--merges flag.
Since merge commits have more than one parent, there is more than one path that you can follow.
You can preventgit log from displaying these merge commits by passing the--no-merges flag.
And it will be a merge commit that will preserve the history of the tree we read.
In most circumstances,this is more intuitive than synchronizing with the remote branch via a merge commit.
For example, if HEAD is a merge commit, the following returns the second parent of HEAD.
For instance, this displays the grandparent of HEAD(assuming it's a merge commit) that rests on the second parent.
This is referred to as a merge commit and is special in that it has more than one parent.
If you followed the advice above and you have used rebase to keep your feature branch up to date,the actual merge commit will not include any changes; this is cool!
In the latter case, the resulting merge commit serves as a symbolic joining of the two branches.
Merge commit-Keeps all commits from your source branch and makes them part of the destination branch.
Pulling in upstream changes with Git merge results in a superfluous merge commit every time you want to see how the project has progressed.
This creates a new"merge commit" in the feature branch that ties together the histories of both branches, giving you a branch structure that looks like this.
The former option results in a 3-way merge and a merge commit, while the latter results in a fast-forward merge and a perfectly linear history.
Instead of using a merge commit, rebasing re-writes the project history by creating brand new commits for each commit in the original branch.
If you would prefer a clean,linear history free of unnecessary merge commits, you should reach for git rebase instead of gitmerge when integrating changes from another branch.
If you want a merge commit to appear in the history of the destination branch, you can choose not to automatically merge the code as part of closing the pull request.