Examples of using Normal hepatic function in English and their translations into German
{-}
-
Medicine
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Political
-
Computer
-
Programming
-
Official/political
-
Political
Normal hepatic function.
Treat with same doses as patients with normal hepatic function.
When compared to patients with normal hepatic function, mild hepatic impairment did not alter dose- normalised bortezomib AUC.
The usually recommended dose in patients with normal hepatic function is 30 mg q. d.
In patients with abnormal hepatic function, serum half-life may be twofold longer than in patients with normal hepatic function.
AUC of ivabradine andthe main active metabolite were about 20% higher than in subjects with normal hepatic function.
Compared to subjects with normal hepatic function, systemic exposure following a single dose of axitinib was similar in subjects with mild hepatic impairment(Child-Pugh class A) and higher(approximately two-fold) in subjects with moderate hepatic impairment Child-Pugh class B.
AUC, Cmax and CL/F were similar in subjects with reduced hepatic function compared with subjects with normal hepatic function.
Compared to healthy subjects with normal hepatic function, the mean steady-state AUC of simeprevir was 2.4-fold higher in non-HCV infected subjects with moderatehepatic impairment(Child-Pugh class B) and 5.2-fold higher in non-HCV infected subjects with severe hepatic impairment Child-Pugh class C.
Ponatinib Cmax was comparable in patients with mild hepatic impairment andhealthy volunteers with normal hepatic function.
There were no significant differences in AUCs of 5-FU, tegafur, gimeracil, or oteracil after either single or multiple dose administration of Teysuno 30 mg/m2 twice daily in patients with mild, moderate,or severe hepatic impairment compared to those with normal hepatic function.
The pharmacokinetics of trastuzumab emtansine and DM1-containing catabolites were evaluated after the administration of 3.6 mg/kg of trastuzumab emtansine tometastatic HER2+ breast cancer patients with normal hepatic function(n=10), mild(Child-Pugh A; n=10) and moderate(Child-Pugh B; n=8) hepatic impairment.
Following administration of a single 10 mg/kg dose of telavancin, the pharmacokinetics of telavancin in subjects with moderate hepatic impairment(Child-Pugh class B)were similar to that observed in subjects with normal hepatic function.
Despite reducing the dosing frequency of ritonavir, subjects with severe hepatic impairment had 64% higher ritonavir Cmax, 40% higher ritonavir AUC(0-24),and 38% higher ritonavir C12 than achieved in subjects with normal hepatic function receiving the standard fosamprenavir with ritonavir 700 mg/ 100 mg twice daily regimen.
In another trial, the pharmacokinetics of abiraterone were examined in subjects with pre-existing severe(n 8) hepatic impairment(Child-Pugh Class C)and in 8 healthy control subjects with normal hepatic function.
In subjects with severe hepatic impairment(Child-Pugh score of 10-13), a reduced dose of fosamprenavir 300 mg twice daily with a reduced dosing frequency of ritonavir 100 mg once daily delivered 19% lower plasma amprenavir Cmax, 23% lower AUC(0-12), and 38% lower C12 values, butsimilar unbound plasma amprenavir C12 values than achieved in subjects with normal hepatic function receiving the standard fosamprenavir with ritonavir 700 mg/ 100 mg twice daily regimen.
Patients with baseline hepatic impairment had a higher incidence of hypertension and PPE, and a higher incidence of Grade 3or 4 hypertension, asthenia, fatigue, and hypocalcaemia compared with patients with normal hepatic function.
In subjects with moderate hepatic impairment(Child-Pugh score of 7-9), a reduced dose of fosamprenavir 450 mg twice daily with a reduced dosing frequency of ritonavir 100 mg once daily is 20 predicted to deliver similar plasma amprenavir Cmax and AUC(0-12), but approximately 35% lower plasma total amprenavir C12 values and approximately 88% higherplasma unbound amprenavir C12 values than achieved in subjects with normal hepatic function receiving the standard fosamprenavir with ritonavir 700 mg/ 100 mg twice daily regimen.
The pharmacokinetics of sonidegib were examined in subjects with mild(Child-Pugh class A; n=8), moderate(Child-Pugh class B; n=8) or severe(Child-Pugh class C; n=9)hepatic impairment and in 8 healthy subjects with normal hepatic function.
In subjects with mild hepatic impairment(Child-Pugh score of 5-6), the dosage regimen of fosamprenavir 700 mg twice daily with a reduced dosing frequency of ritonavir 100 mg once daily provided slightly higher plasma amprenavir Cmax(17%), slightly higher plasma amprenavir AUC(0-12)(22%), similar plasma total amprenavir C12 valuesand approximately 117% higher plasma unbound amprenavir C12 values compared to subjects with normal hepatic function receiving the standard fosamprenavir/ ritonavir 700 mg/ 100 mg twice daily regimen.
In a phase 1 study, after administration of a single 75 mg subcutaneous dose, alirocumab pharmacokinetic profiles in subjects with mild andmoderate hepatic impairment were similar as compared to subjects with normal hepatic function.
Ledipasvir plasma exposure(AUCinf) wassimilar in patients with severe hepatic impairment and control patients with normal hepatic function.
However in DTC, patients with baseline hepatic impairment had a higher incidence of hypertension and PPE, and a higher incidence of Grade 3 or 4 hypertension, asthenia, fatigue,and hypocalcaemia compared with patients with normal hepatic function.
The plasma amprenavir pharmacokinetics were evaluated in a 14 day repeat-dose study in HIV-1 infected adult subjects with mild, moderate, or severe hepatic impairment receiving fosamprenavir withritonavir compared to matched control subjects with normal hepatic function.
Following administration of a single dose of lesinurad at 400 mg in patients with mild(Child-Pugh class A) or moderate(Child-Pugh class B) hepatic impairment, lesinurad Cmax was comparable and lesinurad AUC was 7% and 33% higher, respectively,compared to individuals with normal hepatic function.
Fosamprenavir with ritonavir was generally well-tolerated in subjects with mild, moderate, or severe hepatic impairment, and these regimens had similar adverse event andclinical laboratory profiles as previous studies of HIV-1 infected subjects with normal hepatic function.
In a clinical study using single doses of 20 mg/kg deferasirox dispersible tablets, the average exposure was increased by 16% in subjects with mild hepatic impairment(Child-Pugh Class A) and by 76% insubjects with moderate hepatic impairment(Child-Pugh Class B) compared to subjects with normal hepatic function.
The median steady-state pazopanib Cmax and AUC(0-24) in patients with mild abnormalities in hepatic parameters(defined as either normal bilirubin and any degree of ALT elevation or as an elevation of bilirubin up to 1.5 x ULN regardless of the ALT value) after administration of 800 mg oncedaily are similar to the median in patients with normal hepatic function see Table 7.
Based on a PopPK analysis, no clinically meaningful differences in the clearance of olaratumab were observed in patients with mild(total bilirubin within upper limit of normal[ULN] and AST> ULN, or total bilirubin> 1.0-1.5 times ULN and any AST level, n 16), or moderate(total bilirubin> 1.5-3.0 times ULN, n 1)hepatic impairment compared to patients with normal hepatic function total bilirubin and AST≤ ULN, n 126.
In a clinical study in patients with hepatic impairment(degree of impairment based on subject's AST and total bilirubin levels) following multiple doses of vismodegib, it was shown that in patients with mild(NCI-ODWG criteria, n=8), moderate(NCI-ODWG criteria, n=6), and severe(NCI-ODWG criteria, n=3) hepatic impairment,the pharmacokinetic profile of vismodegib was comparable to that of subjects with normal hepatic function(n=9) see section 4.2.