Examples of using A controller or processor in English and their translations into Greek
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Financial
-
Official/political
-
Computer
Right to a judicial remedy against a controller or processor.
Compliance with these criteria implies that a controller or processor has taken steps to ensure that he meets certain requirements for a certain period of time.
Right to an effective judicial remedy against a controller or processor.
GDPR applies to the processing activities by a controller or processor not established in the Union, where the processing activities are related to.
Article 52 Right to a judicial remedy against a controller or processor.
Certification shall be issued to a controller or processor for a maximum period of three years and may be renewed, under the same conditions, provided that the relevant requirements continue to be met.
Article 79 Right to an effective judicial remedy against a controller or processor.
(24) The personal data of persons who are in the Union by a controller or processor is not established in the Union should also be covered by this Regulation, if the monitoring of the behavior of such data subjects to the extent that their behavior is taking place within the Union.
Right to an effective judicial remedy against a controller or processor- Art. 79 GDP.
The processing of personal data of data subjects who are in the Union by a controller or processor not established in the Union should also be subject to this Regulation when it is related to the monitoring of the behaviour of such data subjects in so far as their behaviour takes place within the Union.
Article 3 GDPR states that the“GDPR applies to the processing of personal data of data subjects who are in the Union by a controller or processor not established in the Union” if one of the following criteria is fulfilled.
To determine whether such a controller or processor offers goodsor services to data subjects in the Union, it must be determined if the controller or the processor is clearly intended to provide services to data subjects in one or more EU Member States.
The GDPR applies to organizations established outside the EU, if they(as a controller or processor) control the behavior of EU residents.
(116) For proceedings against a controller or processor, the plaintiff should have the choice to bring the action before the courts of the Member States where the controller or processor has an establishment or where the data subject resides, unless the controller is a public authority acting in the exercise of its public powers.
This Regulation applies to the processing of personal data of data subjects who are in the Union by a controller or processor not established in the Union, where the processing activities are related to.
The lead supervisory authority may request at any time other supervisory authorities concerned to provide mutual assistance pursuant to Article 61 and may conduct joint operations pursuant to Article 62, in particular for carrying out investigations or for monitoring the implementation of a measure concerning a controller or processor established in another Member State.
Processing of personal data which takes place in the context of the activities of a single establishment of a controller or processor in the Union but which substantially affectsor is likely to substantially affect data subjects in more than one Member State.
However, the need of compliance with the GDPR must not be translated as a need to acquire any kind of certificate butit must lead to a change in the way that companies acting as a controller or processor deal with personal data.
This may include judgments of courts or tribunals or decisions of administrative authorities in third countries requiring a controller or processor to transfer or disclose personal data, and which are not based on an international agreement in force between the requesting third country and the Union.
Recital 147(147) Where specific rules on jurisdiction arecontained in this Regulation, in particular as regards proceedings seeking a judicial remedy including compensation, against a controller or processor, general jurisdiction rules such as those of Regulation(EU) No 1215/
This may include court decisions or decisions of administrative authorities in third countries that require a controller or processor to transfer or disclose personal data which are not based on international agreement, eg Convention on Mutual Assistance in force between the country concerned and the Union or a Member State requesting.
Established procedures and structures to handle complaints about infringements of the code or the manner in whichthe code has been, or is being, implemented by a controller or processor, and to make those procedures and structures transparent to data subjects and the public; and.
(20)‘binding corporate rules' means personal data protection policies which are adhered to by a controller or processor established on the territory of a Member State for transfers or a set of transfers of personal data to a controller or processor in one or more third countries within a group of undertakings,or group of enterprises engaged in a joint economic activity;
It has established procedures and structures to deal with complaints of violations of the code or concerning the manner in which the code is implemented or applied by a controller or processor, and to make these processes and structures transparent to data subjects and the general public, and.
Recital 145 EU GDPR(145) For proceedings against a controller or processor, the plaintiff should have the choice to bring the action before the courts of the Member States where the controller or processor has an establishment or where the data subject resides, unless the controller is a public authority of a Member State acting in the exercise of its public powers.
Where specific rules on jurisdiction are contained in this Regulation,in particular as regards proceedings seeking a judicial remedy including compensation, against a controller or processor, general jurisdiction rules such as those of Regulation(EU) No 1215/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council(13) should not prejudice the application of such specific rules.
This may include judgments of courts or tribunals or decisions of administrative authorities in third countries requiring a controller or processor to transfer or disclose personal data, and which are not based on an international agreement, such as a mutual legal assistance treaty, in force between the requesting third country and the Union or a Member State.
Any judgment of a court or tribunal andany decision of an administrative authority of a third country requiring a controller or processor to transfer or disclose personal data may only be recognisedor enforceable in any manner if based on an international agreement, such as a mutual legal assistance treaty, in force between the requesting third country and the Union or a Member State, without prejudice to other grounds for transfer pursuant to this Chapter.