Examples of using Decision declaring in English and their translations into Hungarian
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Financial
-
Programming
-
Official/political
-
Computer
Decision declaring the concentration compatible with the internal market- Manifest errors of assessment- Obligation to state reasons.
For a judgment delivered by a foreign court, an additional procedure is required, as appropriate,namely a decision declaring enforceability(exequatur).
The decision declaring the concentration compatible shall also cover restrictions directly related and necessary to the implementation of the concentration.
(Competition- Concentrations- European markets for internet communications services- Decision declaring the concentration compatible with the internal market- Manifest errors of assessment- Obligation to state reasons).
A decision declaring a concentration compatible shall be deemed to cover restrictions directly related and necessary to the implementation of the concentration.
(2) Should a Member of the Constitutional Court fail to comply with the obligation set forth in Section 10(2) to(3) by the time specified therein,the plenary session of the Constitutional Court shall issue a decision declaring incompatibility.
A decision declaring a concentration compatible shall be deemed to cover restrictions directly related and necessary to the implementation of the concentration.
Moreover, the referring court harbours doubts about the adequacy of the 8-day time limit within which itmust complete the review of the Immigration Office's decision declaring the applicant's application inadmissible.
The decision declaring the concentration compatible with the common market shall also cover restrictions directly related and necessary to the implementation of the concentration.';
Action for annulment- State aid-Subsidy scheme for the acquisition of natural areas for environmental protection- Decision declaring the aid compatible with the internal market- No interest in bringing proceedings- Inadmissibility.
A decision declaring EIA unnecessary cannot be appealed immediately to court, but may be examined during the reviewing of the act authorizing the intended project(for example, the building permit).
There is no rule of law or principle which prevents the Commission from entrusting to the same officialsre‑examination of a concentration in compliance with a judgment annulling a decision declaring that concentration to be incompatible with the common market.
Competition- Regulation(EEC) No 4064/89- Decision declaring a concentration to be incompatible with the common market- Application for annulment- Relevant market- Collective dominant position- Proof.
(Appeals- State aid- Aid granted by the Danish authorities to the public undertaking Danske Statsbaner(DSB)- Public service contracts for the supply of rail passenger transport services between Copenhagen(Denmark)and Ystad(Sweden)- Decision declaring the aid compatible with the internal market subject to conditions- Temporal application of rules of substantive law).
(Competition Regulation(EEC) No 4064/89 Decision declaring aconcentration incompatible with the common market Action for annulment Admissibility Legal interest in bringing proceedings Territorial scope ofRegulation(EEC) No 4064/89 Collective dominant position Commitments).
Likewise, given that Article 1 of the Third Steel Aid Code prohibited both aid that was and aid that was not specific to the steel sector,the Commission could not implicitly withdraw a decision declaring an aid scheme that was not specific to the coal and steel sector compatible with the common market on the basis of Articles 87 EC and 88 EC.
In cases of failure to fulfil a condition attached to the decision declaring a concentration compatible with the common market, the situation rendering the concentration compatible with the common market does not materialise and the concentration, as implemented, is therefore not authorised by the Commission.
(State aid- Rail transport- Aid granted by the Danish authorities to the public undertaking Danske Statsbaner(DSB)- Public service contracts for the supply of rail passenger transport services between Copenhagen andYstad- Decision declaring the aid compatible with the internal market subject to certain conditions- Temporal application of rules of substantive law- Service of general economic interest- Manifest error of assessment).
(State aid- Banking sector- Restructuring of HSH Nordbank- Decision declaring the aid compatible with the internal market on certain conditions- Action for annulment- Lack of individual concern- Minority shareholder of the aid beneficiary- Concept of a separate interest- Partial inadmissibility- Capital dilution).
Case T-422/07 Djebel- SGPS v Commission State aid- Aid scheme designed to promote modern and competitive entrepreneurial strategies- Planned aid for a commercial company in the form of a soft loan in order tohelp finance an investment by that company in Brazil- Decision declaring aid to be incompatible with the common market- Duty to state reasons- Impairment of competition- Effect on trade between Member States- Equal treatment.
Schneider considers that the Commissionwas unfair towards it by unlawfully giving it the impression that a decision declaring the transaction compatible might be contemplated, by not warning it early enough that it intended prohibiting the transaction and by not informing it of the existence of decisive obstacles to the authorisation of the transaction.
State aid- Financial sector- Aid designed to remedy a serious disturbance in the economy of a Member State- Capital injection with repayment or share conversion options conferred on the aid recipient-Amendment to the repayment terms during the administrative procedure- Decision declaring the aid compatible with the common market- Concept of State aid- Advantage- Private investor test- Necessary and proportionate relationship between the amount of aid and the extent of measures intended to ensure compatibility of the aid.
Actions for annulment- State aid- Household appliances-Restructuring aid- Decision declaring the aid compatible with the internal market, subject to compliance with certain conditions- Decision taken following the annulment by the Court of the earlier decision concerning the same procedure- Lack of individual concern- No substantial effect on the competitive position- Inadmissibility'.
The existing notice on ancillary restraints was revised to take account of the new Merger Regulation,which provides that a decision declaring a concentration compatible with the common market“shall be deemed to cover restrictions directly related and necessary to the implementation of the concentration145”.
(Appeal- State aid- Production of aluminium-Preferential electricity tariff granted by a contract- Decision declaring the aid compatible with the internal market- Termination of the contract- Judicial suspension of the effects of termination of the contract- Decision declaring the aid unlawful- Article 108(3) TFEU- Concepts of‘existing aid' and‘new aid'- Distinction).
State aid- Fruit and vegetable sector-‘Contingency plans' aimed at supporting the fruit andvegetable market in France- Decision declaring the aid to be incompatible with the common market- Concept of State aid- State resources- Joint financing by a public body and by voluntary contributions from producer organisations- Arguments contrary to the facts submitted during the administrative proceedings- Operating aid- Legitimate expectation.
State aid- Aid to support the deployment of next generation broadband networks in the Cornwall andIsles of Scilly region- Decision declaring the aid compatible with the internal market- Article 107(3)(c) TFEU- Action for annulment- Locus standi- No substantial effect on the competitive position- Procedural rights of the interested parties- Partial inadmissibility- No doubts which justify initiating the formal investigation procedure.
Article 10(3) states that decisions declaring a concentration incompatible with the common market must be taken within four months of the date on which phase II is initiated.
Any decision declared enforceable shall have the same force and effect as if it had been issued by a competent authority of the State where enforcement is sought.
