Examples of using Minimum level of harmonisation in English and their translations into Hungarian
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Financial
-
Programming
-
Official/political
-
Computer
The framework decision of 2004 establishes a minimum level of harmonisation for national legislations in respect of criminalisation and jurisdiction.
The EESC considers that it would be more appropriate to choose a framework Directive,even though the Commission considers that a minimum level of harmonisation needs to be achieved.
The third major change is the introduction of a minimum level of harmonisation as regards the criteria for assessing construction products in Europe.
The possibility for the Commission to take implementing measures is intended to ensure,where appropriate, a minimum level of harmonisation in this area(paragraph 3).
The directive is an instrument designed to achieve a minimum level of harmonisation through certain overarching principles, but it has been implemented in the Member States in very different ways.
It strongly recommends that the detailed workings of such a mechanism are however dealt with in a Directive in order toensure a minimum level of harmonisation across all EU Member States.
We therefore welcome the Commission's initiative to propose a minimum level of harmonisation of these rules and hope that the Council will agree with this proposal.
The framework sets down a minimum level of harmonisation, leaving it to the national regulation authorities(NRAs) or the Member States to define the implementing measures.
The definition of a common minimum denominator for the nationalwage threshold is necessary to ensure a minimum level of harmonisation in the admission conditions throughout the EU.
On the other hand, it introduces a minimum level of harmonisation, so that the term of all musical compositions with words which contain two or more separate contributions would be calculated in a uniform way.
If parallel systems are used, various safeguards would be needed to ensure smooth functioning,including a minimum level of harmonisation of national laws in their interaction with EU law.
The rapporteur's proposal that the minimum level of harmonisation in consumer protection should be accompanied by the full harmonisation of technical rules is the only acceptable regulatory solution in the present situation.
The European Union's attempt to combine the harmonisation of the internal market with a high level of consumer protection can bestbe achieved by trying to raise the current minimum level of harmonisation in the direction of the best national practices existing in several Member States.
The proposed Directive sets only a minimum level of harmonisation with regard to the activities that should at least be considered criminal offences and does only generally establishes that criminal penalties should be applied to natural persons.
The SREP for LSIs will promotesupervisory convergence in the LSI sector while supporting a minimum level of harmonisation and a continuum in the assessment of significant and less significant institutions.
The proposed directive only sets a minimum level of harmonisation with regard to the activities that should be considered criminal offences and approximates the minimum levels of penalties that should apply in the most serious cases when the offence causes a particularly serious result or is committed under aggravating circumstances.
The proposal complies with the proportionality principle as it sets a minimum level of harmonisation, leaving the definition of implementing measures to national regulatory authorities(NRAs) or Member States.
For the EU planned measurement programme, a certain minimum level of harmonisation will be required to allow for the validation and comparison of data, to produce meaningful results at the EU level and for setting up of ad hoc reduction targets.
As Mrs Roure's report points out,the framework decision establishes only a minimum level of harmonisation, and its effectiveness and scope have been severely limited by the many derogations it includes.
The pilot project completed inOctober 2006 has demonstrated that a certain minimum level of harmonisation of definitions will be required to allow the validation and comparison of data across countries, to produce meaningful results at the EU level and for setting up of ad hoc reduction targets.
This proposal complies with the proportionality principle in that it sets forth a minimum level of harmonisation, leaving the definition of the implementing measures to the Member States or the national regulatory authorities.
This proposal complies with the proportionality principle as it proposes a minimum level of harmonisation, leaving the definition of the implementing measures to the NRAs or to the Member States, as in the following areas.
At EU level, an internal market approach is necessary to ensure minimum levels of harmonisation and interoperability, as well as legal certainty.
This raises the question as to whether the current regime(i.e. minimum harmonisation) is appropriate to achieve an effective level of harmonisation of transparency requirements in the EU.
Thus many consumer organisations havecome to regard full harmonisation as synonymous with a minimum level of consumer protection and minimum harmonisation as offering the possibility of a much greater level of protection.
In order to provide the system with a certain level of harmonisation, minimum Community standards should be set.
It is therefore necessary to aim to increase the minimum level of current harmonisation by applying available best practices.
The pursuit of this objective must lead to the definition of a minimum level of technical harmonisation and make it possible to.
Article 153 clearly identifies the concept of minimum harmonisation and a high level of consumer protection as a fundamental principle of Community consumer policy15.
Examples of provisions that exceed the minimum harmonisation level of this Directive include lower thresholds for permissible charges for re-use than the thresholds foreseen in Article 6 or less restrictive licensing terms than those referred to in Article 8.