Examples of using Microevolution in English and their translations into Indonesian
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
-
Ecclesiastic
WEB The little scale development is called microevolution.
It results from microevolution taking place over many generations.
We remember by location much better due to microevolution.
Microevolution can result in some drastic changes, such as those found in dogs.
Some scientists attach to such slight changes the term“microevolution.”.
People also translate
Therefore, microevolution may occur within the dog species, but macroevolution never will.
Second is the problem in projecting“microevolution” into“macroevolution.”.
Hence, it is clear that microevolution may frequently occur within same species but macroevolution never will.
Macroevolution is merely the result of a lot of microevolution over a long period of time.
Microevolution looks at adaptations that concern the survival of the fittest, not the arrival of the fittest.
For biologists, there is no relevant difference between microevolution and macroevolution.
Natural Selection might explain microevolution, but it cannot explain the origin of new species and higher orders of life.
These claims are often brought up with another misconception related to microevolution and macroevolution.
Natural selection might explain microevolution, but it doesn't explain the origin of new species.
Invertebrates set the trail for the evolution of differentorganisms as simple transformations began happening(see microevolution).
The essence of what constitutes microevolution is, for creationists, different from the essence of what constitutes macroevolution.
Concrete evidence for the theory ofmodification by natural selection is limited to microevolution- that is, evolution within populations or species.
In contrast with microevolution, macroevolution reflects large- scale changes at the species level, which result from the accumulation of numerous small changes on the microevolutionary scale.
Concrete evidence for the theory ofmodification by natural selection is limited to microevolution- that is, evolution at or below the level of species.
Origins Archive readily illustrate that evolutionists define the term differently and remain in debate particularly regarding whether speciationshould be considered a part of macro of microevolution.
Creationists are under the impression if there is some magic line between microevolution and macroevolution, but no such line exists in science.
And many people who are not already well-informed on the subject comeaway with the superficial idea that"as it spreads, microevolution can turn into macroevolution.".
Diversity within a species- that is, variation- they called"microevolution," and the hypothesis of the development of new species was termed"macroevolution.".
Because there is no known barrier to large change and because we can expectsmall changes to accumulate into large changes, microevolution implies macroevolution.
Creationists act as if there is some magic line between microevolution and macroevolution, but no such line exists as far as science is concerned.
The central question of the Chicago conference was whether the mechanisms underlying microevolution can be extrapolated to explain the phenomena of macroevolution.
A second problem with the creationist use of the terms microevolution and macroevolution is the fact that the definition of what constitutes a species is not consistently defined.