Examples of using Sfs in English and their translations into Polish
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Financial
-
Official/political
-
Programming
-
Computer
How to open. sfs file?
He went nuts and killed two SFs.
Both SFs suffered serious injuries, but they're going to be OK.
How can I convert. sfs file?
Evaluating SFs expenditure is an intrinsically complex process.
What application can open. sfs file?
The SFs were using blank cartridges. Same as your backup weapons.
Programs using this file extension:. sfs.
The SFs will be used to promote de-institutionalisation and reinforce community-based services.
Where can I find informations about. sfs file extension?
SFs stimulate the development of more appropriate structures and capacities to handle development projects.
The Department of Linguistics(Seminar für Sprachwissenschaft; SfS) was founded in 1985.
The SfS is currently partner in the IMDI project aiming at descriptive standards for language resources.
Several EESC Opinions4 have underlined the fact that the SFs objectives are broader than the Europe 2020 strategy.
The evaluation did not fully succeed in comparing the unit costs of projects receiving assistance under the SFs.
The research focus of the SfS is on theoretical and computational linguistics from an interdisciplinary perspective.
It is clearly very important to assess the effective impact of this expenditure and, for this reason, SFs programmes are subject to regular evaluation.
Member States are drawing on the SFs to effectively complement national, regional and local funding and activities.
The EESC welcomes the provisions proposed concerning thesocial economy actors and recommends clarification of their participation in SFs' objectives.
The SfS has a long track record in external funding and has gained rich experience in various national and international projects and research programs.
The audit concerned ex post evaluations, carried out by the Commission, in connection with SFs interventions over the 1994-1999 programming period which amounted to over 245 billion euro.
The SFs will be used to support reform and capacity building mainly in Convergence regions, to improve access and to develop human resources.
The European Fisheries Fund(EFF) and the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development(EAFRD)are no longer SFs in the strict sense and are located under a different heading of the Financial Perspectives.
The inclusion of these partners in this process of support, studies, evaluations, expert support along with other actions supported through technical assistance will bring more meaningful participation andcapacity of participation for all partners in SFs.
The EESC welcomes the proposed general regulation outlining a common set of rules applicable to the SFs; this will bring EU common perspective and more coherence and effectiveness to the cohesion policy in the EU.
The relevant Synthesis Reports and a sample of national evaluations were examined corresponding to these selected objectives and instruments[7] which, together, accounted for 124 billion euro,that is 82% of the total scheduled aid under the SFs for the 1994 to 1999 programming period 8.
For example, if the SFs provide assistance in the building of a factory, the impact on the region's economy is not limited to the construction of the building but relates also to the permanent jobs it gives rise to as a result of the investment by the private sector that takes place following the construction of the factory.
The severity of the economic crisis highlights the fact thatthe amount(EUR 376 bn) currently proposed by the Commission for SFs 2014-2020 will not be enough to bring about more economic, social and territorial cohesion in the EU.
The EESC is profoundly worried about the impact of the crisis and believes that the SFs can contribute to exit from the crisis provided the review of the economic governance of the EU that is not currently delivering growth, employment and social inclusion emphasises that austerity measures taken for macro-economic stability should not undermine the efforts to achieve more cohesion in EU; structural interventions should bring results for growth, social inclusion and better levels of employment.
The inclusion of these partners in this process of support, studies, evaluations, expert support along with other actions supported through technical assistance will bring more meaningful participation andcapacity of participation for all partners in SFs and will ultimately be of benefit for cohesion policy's successful implementation.
