Examples of using Communication dated in English and their translations into Portuguese
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
-
Medicine
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
-
Official/political
However, a further communication dated 10 June 1997 acknowledged that the.
The new procedure is outlined in a Commission Communication dated 3 July 2003.4.
This latest communication, dated July 10th, 2004, mentioned the said countries at the bottom of the said letter.
This can be verified by documented radio communication dated on 21 May 1945.
In a communication dated August 16, 2000, the Commission reiterated its request for information from the Petitioners.
The State submitted its response to the petition in a communication dated March 30, 1998.
In a communication dated March 12, 2001, the State presented arguments concerning the admissibility of the petition.
The Commission returned to the issue of late payment in a communication dated 27 March199694.
As indicated above, by communication dated December 6, 1999 the State acknowledged receipt of the Commission's note of November 29, 1999.
This discussion, an analysis of the problems, together with proposed solutions, was prepared by the Commission andpresented to the Council in a communication dated 29 September 1978.
The State provided further information via a communication dated January 2, 2001. This was transmitted to the petitioner for her information on January 23, 2001.
In communications dated April 11, 2002 and July 15, 2002 the State provided the Commission with information and arguments in which it disputed the Commission's jurisdiction to adopt the precautionary measures, and the Petitioners responded tothe State's April 11, 2002 observations in a communication dated May 13, 2002.
The Commissioner also referred to the Commission communication dated 12 November 2001 on behaviour which seriously infringed the rules of the CFP in 2000.
By communication dated October 5, 2000, which was received by the Commission on October 6, 2000, the Commission received information from the State respecting Mr. Aitken's petition.
The Commission transmitted the pertinent parts of that communication to the State in a communication dated November 29, 1999, requesting that information relevant to the case be provided within 30 days.
In a communication dated January 19, 2001 and received by the Commission on January 22, 2001, the Petitioners delivered observations on the State's December 15, 2000 response.
The Commission transmitted the contents of this second brief of the State to the petitioners via a communication dated January 11, 2001, granting them 60 days to present observations thereon or to provide additional information.
In a Communication dated May 2007 the Commission presented, the potential risks related to the use of information technology, such as identity theft, surveillance or even fraud.
On March 3, 2000 the petitioners sent their observations on the reply of the State,which were transmitted to the Government by a communication dated May 19, 2000, giving it 60 days to send additional information or observations on the petitioners' brief.
By communication dated December 18, 2001 and received by the Commission on December 19, 2001, the State delivered a response to the Commission's request for information, in which it indicated as follows.
The Council adopted the conclusions set out below on the"Clean Air For Europe" programme proposed by the Commission in a communication dated 4 May 2001 with the general aim of developing a long-term, strategic and integrated policy as laid down in the Sixth Environmental Action Programme to protect against the effects of air pollution on human health and the environment.
In a communication dated August 29, 2001 and received by the Commission on September 4, 2001 the Petitioner informed the Commission that on Mr. Domingues' behalf he accepted the Commission's offer to facilitate a friendly settlement of the matter.
On December 19, 1997,the Commission received a communication dated December 10, that indicated that the complaint did meet the requirements of Article 38(1) of the Commission's Regulations.
By communication dated November 29, 2003 and received by the Commission on December 1, 2003, the Petitioners provided a response to the Commission's October 29, 2003 request for information, in which they indicated that the Government of the United States had failed to comply with the Commission's recommendations.
The Council considers that the Commission communication dated 4 October 2000 provides a basis for settling the banana dispute, which now can and must be resolved rapidly.
In a communication dated November 7, 1995, and received the following day, the petitioners informed the Commission that they had met with a number of State officials, and requested a 30 day suspension of the proceedings in order to pursue a possible friendly settlement under the terms of Article 48(f) of the American Convention.
The Commission transmitted the report to the parties in a communication dated December 8, 2000 in which the Commission also placed itself at the disposal of the parties with a view to reaching a friendly settlement of the case pursuant to Articles 18 and 20 of the Commission's Statute.
Subsequently, in a communication dated November 11, 1999, the State requested a further extension in order to comply with the request for information. By note of November 15, 1999, it was given a further 30 days and that decision was also communicated to the petitioners.
By communication dated October 29, 2003, the Commission transmitted this report, adopted as Report No 56/03 pursuant to Article 45(1) of the Commission's Rules of Procedure, to the State and to the Petitioners in accordance with Rule 45(2) of the Commission's Rules and requested information within 30 days as to measures adopted by the State to implement the Commission's recommendations.
In a communication dated September 18, 2002, the United States responded to the Commission's request for information, in which it contended, inter alia, that the Petitioners' complaint was inadmissible for failure to exhaust domestic remedies and should therefore be dismissed, and in particular because the information requested by the Commission was the subject of five cases pending before the U.S. courts.