Examples of using Evaluation found in English and their translations into Romanian
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
-
Programming
In addition the evaluation found that.
The evaluation found that IPA produced good and meaningful results.
The absence of such a mechanism would generate even higher costs for the EU andEEA States, but the evaluation found that the Dublin III Regulation in general lacked efficiency.
The interim evaluation found that one intermediary thinks this ceiling is too low.
National reports also show that employers may avoid modernising equipment because of the cost,and the on-site evaluation found that some employers tend to give environmental concerns priority over worker health and safety.
The evaluation found that the mechanisms for coordination and harmonisation of assistance were well established.
Given that the CCN/CSI network was a platform common as well to the Customs 2013 programme, the evaluation found that investing in this network was not only pragmatic from the point of view of the IT operations, but brought about economies of scale of a single IT architecture.
The evaluation found that the Governing Board largely supports Cedefop's strategic realignment.
The Information system on the integrated tariff of the Community(TARIC) and the Tariff quotas andceilings database(QUOTA) are the only official sources for providing tariff-related information to national authorities and the evaluation found them to be current, reliable and user-friendly.
The impact evaluation found that the funding programme has met the expectations and objectives set.
In assessing how far the EIT achieved its overall objective of increasing the innovation capacity of Member States, the evaluation found that the impact of EIT in structuring innovation across Europe is limited due to factors such as lack of critical mass, administrative inefficiencies and limited economies of scale related to a limited scope of activities.
The evaluation found that there was still considerable diversity in the execution of customs processes related to import around the EU.
The above mentioned retrospective evaluation found that the impacts of temporary cessation were primarily economic(including some evidence about maintaining jobs in the short term), rather than environmental, in nature.
The evaluation found also that the quality of objectives and indicators in the MIPDs and the programming documents had improved over time.
Regarding technological progress, the evaluation found that developments resulting from the research conducted in Fuel Cells and Hydrogen have ensured market improvement(e.g. by reducing costs and improving performance and life span of components).
The evaluation found that the relation between the benefit and the cost of the implementation of this principle is negative for the objective targeted.
The evaluation found that Erasmus Mundus has made a generally positive contribution to the EU's strategic objectives in the field of higher education.
The evaluation found that since its establishment, ACER has become a credible and respected institution playing a prominent role in the energy regulatory arena.
The evaluation found that the small and medium-sized enterprises scheme had not been used to the expected extent as the disclosure requirements were too burdensome.
The evaluation found that they also fostered trust and thereby encouraged the free sharing of information and uptake of common IT systems and other processes.
The evaluation found that the development of sector strategies was an important step to strengthen effective stakeholder participation but a longer term perspective was necessary.
The evaluation found that the deliverables and outputs produced by the projects would benefit from a more targeted dissemination and from being used as resources for policy development.
The evaluation found that the legal provisions were not detailed enough and this, together with the lack of experience of many implementing bodies, led to delays in implementation.
Yet the 2010 evaluation found that when all beneficiaries and products are taken together, the evidence for diversification is largely limited to products with low preference margins exported by emerging economies.
The evaluation found that the level of trust required between Member State authorities for such systems to be effective cannot be taken for granted, given the variety of administrative cultures and working methods.
The evaluation found that both ECOC were successful in implementing a more extensive cultural programme than would have taken place in the absence of ECOC designation, though in Vilnius this was much smaller than had been intended.
The evaluation found that the final project reports were of variable quality and usefulness as information on outputs, results and impacts were not systematically collected and analysed in relation to the programme's objectives.
The evaluation found that in practice the choice of TA or twinning was based on three criteria: the nature of the assignment(twinning mainly for acquis-related areas), the maturity of the beneficiary institution, and the capacity of the beneficiary organisation.
The evaluation found that a large proportion of EU programmes such as the structural funds, Media and Active Citizenship, do have cultural elements to them and that similarities do exist between their objectives, target groups, outputs, results and impacts and those of Culture 2000.
The evaluation found that the country of origin principle has enabled the development and free circulation of audiovisual media services across the EU, with legal certainty and resulted in lower compliance costs for providers and more choice for consumers.