Examples of using Evaluation found in English and their translations into Slovak
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Official/political
-
Computer
-
Programming
The interim evaluation found that one intermediary thinks this ceiling is too low.
The absence of such amechanism would generate even higher costs for the EU and EEA States, but the evaluation found that the Dublin III Regulation in general lacked efficiency.
The evaluation found that the Governing Board largely supports Cedefop's strategic realignment.
As regards the contribution of the requirement for advertisements to contain a reference to the energy class(article 4(c)),this effect could not be quantified but the evaluation found that it did address an information failure in the market.
The evaluation found that the mechanisms for coordination and harmonisation of assistance were well established.
As regards the contribution of the requirement for advertisements to contain a reference to the energy class(article 4(c)),this effect could not be quantified but the evaluation found that it did address an information failure in the market.
The evaluation found that there was still considerable diversity in the execution of customs processes related to import around the EU.
Given that the CCN/CSI networkwas a platform common as well to the Customs 2013 programme, the evaluation found that investing in this network was not only pragmatic from the point of view of the IT operations, but brought about economies of scale of a single IT architecture.
The evaluation found that the relation between the benefit and the cost of the implementation of this principle is negative for the objective targeted.
The Commission has proposedguidelines for the harmonisation of such interfaces across the EU in the past, and the evaluation found that nearly half of the participating countries considered that Customs 2007 could or should have further supported the harmonisation of interfaces at European level.
The evaluation found that Erasmus Mundus has made a generally positive contribution to the EU's strategic objectives in the field of higher education.
The Information system on the integrated tariff of the Community(TARIC) and the Tariff quotas and ceilings database(QUOTA) are the only official sources forproviding tariff-related information to national authorities and the evaluation found them to be current, reliable and user-friendly.
The evaluation found that they also fostered trust and thereby encouraged the free sharing of information and uptake of common IT systems and other processes.
The evaluation found that a quarter of managers agreed to language training in languages other than the main languages used for work purposes.
The evaluation found that the small and medium-sized enterprises scheme had not been used to the expected extent as the disclosure requirements were too burdensome.
The evaluation found that the deliverables and outputs produced by the projects would benefit from a more targeted dissemination and from being used as resources for policy development.
The evaluation found that the development of sector strategies was an important step to strengthen effective stakeholder participation but a longer term perspective was necessary.
The evaluation found that there were problems intrinsic to the nature of the AE actions themselves and that‘the challenge to audit authorities presented by the agri-environment undertakings should not be underestimated'.
Furthermore, the evaluation found that the ETF's programmes were in line with both EU and individual country strategies and that the ETF has been able to influence the direction the reform might take.
The evaluation found that the level of trust required between Member State authorities for such systems to be effective cannot be taken for granted, given the variety of administrative cultures and working methods.
The evaluation found that the final project reports were of variable quality and usefulness as information on outputs, results and impacts were not systematically collected and analysed in relation to the programme's objectives.
The evaluation found that the impact of EU investments in this field could have been maximised by designing integrated strategies for urban regeneration and social projects, with a greater involvement of local stakeholders and beneficiaries of the funds.
The evaluation found that both ECOC were successful in implementing a more extensive cultural programme than would have taken place in the absence of ECOC designation, though in Vilnius this was much smaller than had been intended.
The evaluation found that the country of origin principle has enabled the development and free circulation of audiovisual media services across the EU, with legal certainty and resulted in lower compliance costs for providers and more choice for consumers.
The evaluation found that in practice the choice of TA or twinning was based on three criteria: the nature of the assignment(twinning mainly for acquis-related areas), the maturity of the beneficiary institution, and the capacity of the beneficiary organisation.
The evaluation found that a large proportion of EU programmes such as the structural funds, Media and Active Citizenship, do have cultural elements to them and that similarities do exist between their objectives, target groups, outputs, results and impacts and those of Culture 2000.
The evaluation found that the mechanisms for donor coordination and harmonisation of assistance were well established and that a determining factor in terms of achieving impact and sustainability was the beneficiary countries' ownership of the reform agenda and the capacity of their administration, which need to be strengthened.
While the evaluation found that Action 1 Masters Courses and Action 2 scholarships for students were clearly complementary and worked effectively together, the evidence concerning the effectiveness of Action 2 scholarships for scholars, Action 3 Partnerships and Action 4 projects is less compelling.
The evaluation found that knowledge management strategies within national administrations, reflecting how national administrations organised cooperation on multilateral controls(MLCs) and IT systems as well as the division of responsibility for tasks related to Fiscalis 2013, contributed positively to the achievements of the programme.
The evaluation found that all four ECOC were effective in achieving impacts related to economic, tourism and urban development objectives; tourism increased in all four cases and there is evidence of impact on the local economy; all four ECOC either directly funded cultural infrastructure and urban development investments or gave them greater impetus.