Examples of using Comparable instruments in English and their translations into Russian
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Therefore, any recommendations as to stock options or comparable instruments were not implemented.
Article 17 of the Optional Protocol, providing that no reservations to the Optional Protocol shall be permitted,has no equivalent in comparable instruments.
Pricing issues could be alleviated by creating a set of comparable instruments issued by different emerging economies.
The document should also include an overview of financial arrangements under different UNECE instruments and other comparable instruments.
Pricing issues could be alleviated by creating a set of comparable instruments issued by different emerging economies.
Comparable instruments do not include provisions establishing inadmissibility where the communication is manifestly ill-founded or not sufficiently substantiated.
Despite its compact size, this system provides ameasuring volume of 500 x 500 x 500 millimeters- and therefore considerably more than comparable instruments. .
Similar provisions exist in comparable instruments, with the first Optional Protocol, CAT and MWC providing the same six-month period and the CERD a three-month time-frame for replies.21.
The document should include an overview of financial arrangements under different UNECE instruments and other comparable instruments(CEP/WG.5/2001/2, para. 36).
Comparable instruments require that a violation of rights be alleged in the complaint, but do not foresee failure to comply by the State party as a separate basis for a complaint.
The monetary compensation elements granted to the Company‘s Management Board members do neither comprise variable elements norstock options or comparable instruments nor the participation in any pension schemes.
All four comparable instruments specify that communications may be submitted by individuals; CERD extends this right to“groups of individuals” and CAT and MWC provide that communications may also be submitted“on behalf of individuals”.5.
Though small and occasional additions to the pool of GDP-indexed bonds, would not solve the issue of a sizeable amount of comparable instruments, a coordinated effort of several countries could generate the necessary critical mass.
Similar formulations to article 7.1 of the Optional Protocol, which provides that the Committee shall consider a communication in the light of information made available to it by the claimant(s) and the State party,appear in comparable instruments.
An overview of financial arrangements under different UNECE instruments and other comparable instruments was undertaken by the secretariat in 2002 in preparation for the first meeting of the Parties to the Aarhus Convention CEP/WG.5/2002/4.
All four comparable instruments specify that communications may be submitted by individuals; CERD extends this right also to“groups of individuals”, and CAT and MWC specify that communications may also be submitted“on behalf of individuals”.10.
Article 11 of the Optional Protocol, requiring a State party to take all appropriate steps to ensure that individuals under its jurisdiction are not subjected to ill-treatment or intimidation as a consequence of communicating with the Committee pursuant to the Optional Protocol,has no equivalent in comparable instruments.
Article 7.2 of the Optional Protocol, requiring the Committee to hold closedmeetings when examining communications, has an equivalent in all comparable instruments, 24 as does article 7.3, which requires the Committee, after examining a communication, to transmit its views on the communication, together with its recommendations to the parties concerned.25 Such views commonly contain recommendations of remedies a State party is expected to take.26.
Equivalent provisions to the provisions of the Optional Protocol relating to the Committee's report on its activities under the Optional Protocol(article 12), the ratification procedure(article 15), entry into force(article 16), amendment(article 18), denunciation(article 19) andthe depositary functions of the Secretary-General can be found in comparable instruments.
Article 7.4 of the Optional Protocol, requiring the State party to give due consideration to the views of the Committee, together with its recommendations, if any, and to submit to the Committee within six months a written response, including information on any action taken in the light of views and recommendations of the Committee,has no equivalent in comparable instruments.
There is no comparable instrument at the global level or in other regions.
No other comparable instrument presents these two preconditions for admissibility of a communication in a single article.
Comparable survey instruments: Translation of concepts and wording.
Noted the need for standard instruments and comparable indicators on disability;
There is no comparable provision in existing instruments.
There are no provisions in the four existing instruments comparable to the formulations contained in article 20 of the draft OP and its alternative.
The definitions were used for technical purposes in international commercial practice; to his knowledge,they had not been used in instruments comparable to the draft convention.
Article 12 of the draft OP andits alternative formulations have no comparable provision in existing instruments.
Both alternatives incorporate a number of criteria that are not found in comparable international instruments or in the rules of procedure of the respective treaty bodies with regard to communications.
With the domestic implementation of the CWC showing higher rates of compliance than comparable legal instruments, the OPCW has had its own successful experience and will continue to share it with others.