Examples of using Contract avoided in English and their translations into Russian
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The seller may declare the contract avoided.
The buyer declared the contract avoided and placed the jeans at the seller's disposal.
The buyer may declare the contract avoided.
Therefore, the buyer declared the contract avoided(article 49(1)CISG) and refused to pay the outstanding balance.
The buyer finally declared the contract avoided.
The seller declared the contract avoided and sued the buyer for damages.
The seller also requested the Court to declare the contract avoided.
The seller must declare the contract avoided by means of a notice article 26.
Some two weeks later the defendant declared the contract avoided.
The Italian final customer declared the contract avoided and the plaintiff had to pay back the purchase price.
Under article 64(1)the seller could declare the contract avoided.
The buyer was entitled to declare the contract avoided under articles 81(1), 49(1)(a) and 51(1) CISG.
The buyer assigned his rights to the lessee,who declared the contract avoided.
The plaintiff thus was entitled to declare the contract avoided pursuant to Articles 61(1) and 64(1) CISG.
When the defendant failed to perform its obligation,the plaintiff declared the contract avoided.
After exchanging several letters, the buyer declared the contract avoided in a letter dated 25 September 2006.
Article 49 specifies the conditions under which the buyer is entitled to declare the contract avoided.
The buyer declared the contract avoided and sued the seller for restitution of the first instalment and for damages.
The buyer was therefore entitled to declare the contract avoided under article 49(1)a.
In view of the situation, the buyer declared the contract avoided in respect of the outstanding future instalments within a period of 48 hours after delivery of the third overdue instalment.
Article 64(1) specifies two cases in which the seller has the right to declare the contract avoided.
In addition, the arbitral court found that the respondent could not declare the contract avoided on the basis that the terms of delivery had not been established by the parties article 49(1) CISG.
After the additional period had lapsed without result, the defendant declared the contract avoided.
The seller had therefore the right to declare the contract avoided under article 64 CISG and to claim damages in the amount corresponding to the difference between the contract price and the price of the substitute transaction under article 75 CISG.
Failure to comply with the notice requirement prevents the buyer from being able to declare the contract avoided.
It determined whether the seller was entitled to declare the contract avoided under article 64(1)(a) CISG.
On the contrary, if the non-conforming goods cannot be used or resold with reasonable effort this constitutes a fundamental breach andentitles the buyer to declare the contract avoided.
With regard to the reasonable time for exercising the right of avoidance, as stipulated in article 49 CISG,the Court of Appeal noted that the buyer had not failed to comply with that provision by suing the seller after giving notice of its intention to have the contract avoided, since the buyer had reasonably endeavoured to maintain the contract in force and the seller had requested additional periods of time, which were granted by the buyer article 47 CISG.
Moreover, the court noted that a period of six months between the fixing of the additional period of time andthe declaration of contract avoidance did not forfeit the right to declare the contract avoided.
On the other hand,five weeks were regarded as a reasonable period of time to declare the contract avoided under article 49(2) b.