Examples of using Draft minimum in English and their translations into Russian
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Specific content of the draft minimum rules for.
Cuba made various substantive remarks andsuggestions regarding specific elements of the draft minimum rules.
Content of the draft minimum rules for the.
Convening an expert group to review the draft minimum rules.
In addition, the text of the draft minimum rules required further refinement.
Summary of the positions of Member States regarding the draft minimum rules.
Member Statea Promulgating the draft minimum rules for the administration of criminal justice.
Japan could not support the idea of convening an expert group to review the draft minimum rules.
To note the draft minimum rules for the administration of criminal justice, E/CN.15/1994/11.
Specific areas in which an expert group, should it be convened,should consider making changes to the draft minimum rules.
To note the draft minimum rules for the administration of criminal justice,* For the discussion, see chap. IV. E/CN.15/1994/11.
Tunisia reported that criminal procedure under Tunisian law was in line with the general principles set out in the draft minimum rules.
In favour Necessary changes to the draft minimum rules should be considered on the basis of the views received from Member States.
The East Asia andthe Pacific steering committee for the regional consultation has prepared draft minimum standards for child participation in consultations.
Promulgating the draft minimum rules under such conditions would cause more confusion than clarification and would thus be of little use.
In response to the latest inquiry of the Secretary-General, 13 States provided additional information on the draft minimum rules for the administration of criminal justice.
Hungary supported the promulgation of the draft minimum rules, and considered it necessary to convene an expert group to review the proposed text.
It contains information received from States regarding the advisability andspecific content of the draft minimum rules for the administration of criminal justice.
Austria was of the opinion that the draft minimum rules seemed highly developed but, in their present form, not yet ready for adoption.
Several States have, over the years, provided more than one reply, giving updated information on the administration of criminal justice,as well as specific comments with respect to the draft minimum rules.
Cuba was in favour of the draft minimum rules, which, in its view, could be of great value in the formulation of basic principles for the administration of criminal justice.
The Commission, in its decision 5/101, decided to request the Secretary-General to continue to solicit the views of Member States regarding the advisability andspecific content of the draft minimum rules for the administration of criminal justice and to evaluate those replies.
Aware that the provisions of the draft minimum rules regarding victims are in line with the Declaration of Basic Principles of Justice for Victims of Crime and Abuse of Power.
Thirty-nine of 51 States seem to be either directly or indirectly in favour of the proposal to formulate such minimum rules, whereas six States, while not expressing a clear opinion, stated that their national legislationwas in line or basically compatible with the draft minimum rules.
The expert group should also make a comparison between the content of the draft minimum rules under consideration and other existing international instruments with a universal or regional scope.
Belarus acknowledged that the draft minimum rules were fully in line with universally recognized international standards aimed at the protection of human rights in the administration of criminal justice and that, in general terms, the development and adoption of that international instrument was well advised.
As part of her medical report to the Board and in response to the Board's request at its sixtieth session,the medical consultant presented a draft minimum medical review questionnaire for implementation of the proposed standard, which could replace the current detailed medical questionnaire.
The convening of a group of experts to review the draft minimum rules, giving particular attention to aspects of legal procedure and associated problems pertaining to the different legal systems, was generally viewed as a desirable solution, especially if extrabudgetary funds could be made available for that purpose.
At the same time, it was necessary to move from the first stage of preparation of the draft, consisting in the elucidation of the views of all the Member States regarding the advisability of preparing the draft minimum rules, to the second stage, namely the review of the draft minimum rules by an expert group.
Colombia attached great importance to issuing the draft minimum rules for the administration of criminal justice since they were aimed at improving the framing of policy on crime and the treatment of offenders.