Examples of using Draft resolution failed in English and their translations into Russian
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The draft resolution failed to reflect that approach.
Murderers, gangsters and drug syndicates had resorted to their own form of death penalty upon their hapless victims; the draft resolution failed to mention the suffering and loss of income resulting from such crimes.
The draft resolution failed to take that reality into account.
Mr. Sammis(United States of America) said that, while his delegation also expressed revulsion at attempts to glorify or otherwise promote Nazi ideology and condemned all forms of religious intolerance or hatred,it remained concerned that the draft resolution failed to distinguish between actions and statements that, while offensive, should be protected by freedom of expression and criminal actions motivated by bias, which should always be prohibited.
Yet the draft resolution failed to contribute to a constructive dialogue.
Ms. Schroderus-Fox(Finland), speaking on behalf of the European Union; the acceding countries Bulgaria and Romania; the candidate countries Croatia and the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia; the Stabilization and Association Process countries Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Montenegro and Serbia; and, in addition, Liechtenstein, Moldova and Ukraine,said that her delegation had abstained from voting since the draft resolution failed to address fully the circumstances that had led to the outbreak of hostilities.
Accordingly, the draft resolution failed to carry.
The draft resolution failed to take into account the ongoing bilateral negotiations or the mechanism already in place known as the"road map.
By adopting a narrow definition of decolonization, the draft resolution failed to take into account the complex reality of Non-Self-Governing Territories.
The draft resolution failed to address some core issues related to human rights and extreme poverty.
Her delegation also regretted that the draft resolution failed to mention the key players in globalization: the private sector and civil society.
The draft resolution failed to reflect the fact that the successful restructuring of the GEF governance structure might serve as an example in other areas.
Regrettably, the draft resolution failed to recognize that progress and continued to employ a critical and accusatory approach.
The draft resolution failed to highlight States' obligations at the national level to implement international legal instruments in the fight against racism.
Ms. Robl(United States of America)said that the draft resolution failed to distinguish between offensive expression, which should be protected, and actions, such as discrimination and violence motivated by bias, which should always be prohibited.
The draft resolution failed to distinguish between statements made in exercise of freedom of expression and statements that incited to acts of violence.
Mexico had abstained from voting, since the draft resolution failed to call for actions additional to those decided on by the Security Council and the Human Rights Council which would improve conditions persisting on the ground as a result of the conflict.
The draft resolution failed to take fully into account the specific needs of individual countries and therefore required no specific effort to meet those needs.
His delegation was concerned that the draft resolution failed to distinguish between actions and statements entitled to be protected under the right to freedom of expression and those which incited violence, which should be prohibited.
The draft resolution failed to take into account all the parties responsible for the crisis, as well as the need to respect the sovereignty of the Syrian Arab Republic and pursue an all-inclusive solution.
Mr. Vixay(Lao People's Democratic Republic), supported by Nepal and India,said that the draft resolution failed to reflect positive developments in Myanmar, especially the efforts of its Government to achieve national reconciliation through its seven-step road map, which deserved the Committee's understanding and support, as it would involve all sectors of society in the reconciliation process.
The draft resolution failed to take into account the function of the Human Rights Council and its universal periodic review mechanism, which was designed to ensure that all Member States were assessed in a just and transparent manner.
We changed our position to an abstention last year for two reasons:first, the draft resolution failed adequately to take into account major developments made in recent years in the field of security assurances; and secondly, the text did not reflect our belief that negative security assurances should be provided only to States parties to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons(NPT) that are in full compliance with their NPT obligations.
However, the draft resolution failed to distinguish between actions and statements that, while offensive, might be protected by freedom of expression and actions and statements that incited violence and should therefore be prohibited.
The draft resolution failed to refer to the obligations of States under international law, and did not recognize the positive role that freedom of expression could play in combating racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance.
She regretted that the draft resolution failed to recognize progress and politicized human rights issues, which only served to undermine United Nations efforts to build cooperation and trust with the Government of Myanmar.
The draft resolution failed to take account of the fact that no single political system or electoral process was suited to all nations and peoples and that political systems were subject to historical, political, cultural and religious factors.
The draft resolution failed to mention General Assembly resolution 46/51, paragraph 15 of which reaffirmed the right of peoples under colonial regimes or other forms of alien domination to self-determination, freedom and independence and to struggle legitimately to achieve that right.
Moreover, the draft resolution failed to take into account the progress that had been made as the relationship between the United Kingdom and its Overseas Territories had been modernized, on the basis of partnership, shared values and the right of each Territory to determine whether it wished to retain the link to the United Kingdom.
Furthermore, the draft resolution failed to recognize Israel's extensive cooperation with the United Nations Environment Programme and other United Nations agencies and non-governmental organizations working to address the environmental situation along the coast of Lebanon, or to acknowledge that Israel was an active participant in the Barcelona Convention for the Protection of the Mediterranean Sea against Pollution.