Examples of using Editorial errors in English and their translations into Russian
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Editorial errors, paragraphs 4.3. and 4.6.1.
Corrigendum; to improve editorial errors.
Editorial errors, paragraphs 4.3. and 4.6.1.
In various revisions of Regulation No. 48, some editorial errors were found.
In the event that it contains technical or editorial errors, we retain the right to make alterations at any time and without warning.
He announced a Corrigendum to gtr No. 11 for the June 2010 session of GRPE to correct some editorial errors.
HP shall not be liable for technical or editorial errors or omissions contained herein.
Ms. Joyce(South Africa) said that Austria had also become a sponsor of the draft resolution, anddrew the attention of the Committee to two editorial errors in the text.
HP shall not be liable for technical or editorial errors or omissions contained herein.
Requests the Executive Board to ensure that editorial errors which will not affect the assessment of compliance with validation and verification requirements do not lead to a determination that the request for registration or issuance is incomplete, while ensuring environmental integrity;
HP shall not be liable for technical or editorial errors or omissions contained herein.
The Japanese experts have identified these editorial errors in UN GTR No.2(measurement procedure for two-wheeled motorcycles equipped with positive or compression ignition engine with regard to the emission of gaseous pollutants, CO2 emissions and fuel consumption) on the World-wise harmonized Motorcycle Test Cycle(WMTC) as below.
HP shall not be liable for technical or editorial errors or omissions contained herein.
Is not responsible for technical or editorial errors or omissions in this document, as well as for consequential or incidental damages resulting from furnishing this document.
CPM-5(2010) adopted a Language Review Group(LRG) procedure to correct editorial errors in language versions of adopted ISPMs.
The representative of the EU announced that a Corrigendum to correct editorial errors in gtr No. 11 would be considered by GRPE in January 2011, for subsequent submission to and voting by AC.3 at its June 2011 session.
The Working Party on Pollution and Energy(GRPE) agreed,at its sixty-fourth session, to the Proposal of Japan, to correct these editorial errors described in the informal document No. GRPE-64-05.
During the examination of the text, three editorial errors were discovered in the English version of the text.
The Secretary of the WHDC informal group reported that, on behalf of theinformal group on WHDC, he had prepared ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2010/48 proposing to correct in ECE/TRANS/WP.29/2009/121 editorial errors and also reflecting the proposal by the United States of America regarding the elimination of the remaining options.
The secretariat was informed that several editorial errors in the English version of the text would be communicated.
In addition, concerns were also expressed about editorial errors found in the document for part 10 of the syntax.
AC.3 noted that GRPE had submitted a proposal to correct editorial errors in UN GTR No. 4 for consideration at its November 2011 session.
The Chairman drew attention to an editorial error in the En-glish text of the draft resolution.
First, there is an editorial error in operative paragraph 12(e), which must have occurred when the paragraph was included.
The expert from Japan identified an editorial error in the suggested amendment to paragraph 5.2.2., since subparagraph(c) is repeating subparagraph b.
WP.29 consented that the editorial error may formally be corrected at a later occasion, together with any future substantial amendments.
Due to an editorial error, SC CIRC 16/36 does not correctly reflect the Working Group's efforts to address depredation and assess risks to by-catch species.
Item 13: Informal document INF.34(UIP)- Editorial error in Chapter 5.4 of standard EN 14025:2008.
GRE adopted GRE-67-02, correcting an editorial error, as reproduced below, and requested the secretariat to submit it to WP.29 an AC.1 for consideration at their November 2012 sessions as draft Corrigendum 1 to Revision 5 of UN Regulation No. 6.
The expert from Japan drew the attention of GRE to an editorial error in the example of an approval mark in Supplement 5 to the Regulation, as published in its Rev.1/Amend.1 a missing arrow.