Examples of using Extensions process in English and their translations into Russian
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Support to the Article 5 extensions process.
Extensions processed by the OCSP service, as well as their criticality, meet the RFC 6960 recommendations.
Timelines for the Article 5 extensions process.
An overview of timelines for the extensions process as it concerns these and other relevant States Parties can be found in Annex V.
Timelines for the Article 5 extensions process.
As States Parties have noted, work on an extensions process should not be seen as an alternative to fulfilling Article 5 obligations.
As well, it was recalled that the 7MSP decisions concerning the extensions process imply additional costs.
The article 5 extensions process, agreed to in 2007, has significantly added to the workload for the Presidency, Co-Chairs and Co-Rapporteurs.
Timelines for the Article 5 extensions process Annex VI.
All States Parties are encouraged to provide additional, earmarked funds to the ISU Trust Fund to cover the costs related to the Article 5 extensions process.
The ISU also supported the Article 5 extensions process by preparing and distributing communications from the Presidency informing the States Parties of requests received and inviting expert input on requests.
All 15 States Parties that submitted requests for consideration by the Ninth Meeting of the States Parties(9MSP)received at least a briefing from the ISU on the extensions process.
The ISU also supported the Article 5 extensions process by preparing, supporting and carrying out follow-up activities associated with six meetings of the group of States Parties mandated to analyse Article 5 extension requests.
Xiii to encourage all States Parties in a position to do so to provide additional,ear-marked funds to the ISU Trust Fund to cover costs related to supporting the Article 5 extensions process.
In addition, these Presidents have further kept the States Parties abreast of the application of the Article 5 extensions process by reporting to meetings of the Standing Committee on Mine Clearance, Mine Risk Education and Mine Action Technologies and issuing other written updates as required.
When the process was agreed to in 2006, the 7MSP agreed"to encourage all States Parties in a position to do so to provide additional,earmarked funds to the ISU Trust Fund to cover costs related to supporting the Article 5 extensions process.
The article 5 extensions process implies that if a State Party with a 2011 deadline believes it will be unable to destroy or ensure the destruction of all anti-personnel mines in mined areas that it has reported by its deadline, it should have submitted a request in March of 2010.
With respect to recommendations 7- 10, the ISU held a briefing for analysing group members to review theConvention's mine clearance obligations, the States Parties' understandings related to these obligations and the Article 5 extensions process.
The paper containing the recommendations on the Article 5 extensions process, which was adopted at the 12MSP stated that"supporting the work of the analysing group has, since 2008, been an increasingly important part of the work of the ISU" and that"ways and means(…) to increase the efficiency of the process point to additional demand being placed on the ISU.
With respect to recommendations 7- 10, the Implementation Support Unit held two briefings for analysing group members to review theConvention's mine clearance obligations, the States Parties' understandings related to these obligations and the Article 5 extensions process.
The Article 5 extensions process also highlighted that assistance is most likely to flow to those States Parties that act with urgency to fulfil their obligations and that demonstrate national ownership, establish effective national demining structures and put in place plans to ensure completion of Article 5 obligations in as short a period as possible.
In addition, pursuant to the decision of the 7MSP"to encourage all States Parties in a position to do so to provide additional earmarked funds to the ISU Trust Fund to cover costs related to support the Article 5 extensions process," the 2007 ISU budget provided a means for such earmarking.
The States Parties' Article 5 extensions process calls for requesting States Parties to submit their requests to the presidency no fewer than nine months prior to the Meeting of the States Parties or Review Conference at which a decision on the request would be sought, to append their national demining plans and to request, if necessary, the assistance of the ISU in preparing requests.
Iv States Parties that need to prepare an extension request should, in accordance with the decisions of the 7MSP, as necessary, seek assistance from the ISU in the preparation of their requests andStates Parties in a position to do so should provide additional ear-marked funds to the ISU Trust Fund to cover costs related to supporting the Article 5 extensions process.
Starting and stopping a service occurs after the preference extension processes all other configuration settings.
It is recommended that the 10MSP recall the importance of the timely submission of extension requests to the overall effective functioning of the article 5 extension process.
At the 10MSP, the States Parties recalled the importance of the timely submission of extension requests for the overall effective functioning of the Article 5 extension process and, in this context, recommended that requesting States Parties submit requests no later than 31 March of the year when the request would be considered i.e., the year prior to the State Party's deadline.
The States Parties mandated to analyse requests submitted under Article 5 of the Convention(hereafter referred to as the"analysing group") noted that the late submission of the revised requestimpeded the effort of the analysing group and recalled that the States Parties have previously observed the importance of the timely submission of extension requests to the overall effective functioning of the Article 5 extension process.
They renewed their moral and political commitment to the Convention's objectives-- taking into account, inter alia, the major economic and climatic difficulties that often make it difficult to comply with obligations by the deadlines set out in the Convention-- and they welcomed the deadline extension process as an opportunity to redirect efforts towards compliance.
Also at the 10MSP,"the Meeting recalled the importance of the timely submission of extension requests to the overall effective functioning of the Article 5 extension process and, in this context, recommended that all States Parties that wish to submit requests do so no later than 31 March of the year when the request would be considered i.e., the year prior to the State Party's deadline.