Examples of using Fixed time limits in English and their translations into Russian
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Each party shall be afforded an opportunity to comment on those submissions within fixed time limits.
Within fixed time limits, each party may be afforded an opportunity to comment on submissions made by the other party pursuant to this rule.
However, the Committee must afford the State and the complainant an opportunity to comment on such information within fixed time limits.
By an Order of 31 March 2008, the International Court of Justice fixed time limits for the filing of initial pleadings in the case concerning Maritime Dispute Peru v. Chile.
The Committee may use such information provided that it affords each party an opportunity to comment on such information within fixed time limits rule 72 1.
The Committee may request the State party or the author(s) of the communication to submit, within fixed time limits, additional written explanations or observations relevant to the issues of the admissibility or the merits of a communication.
With the aim of improving the access to health care services,new provisions of law were enacted in 2004 to guarantee access to services within fixed time limits.
The State party recalls the Committee's jurisprudence according to which the Optional Protocol does not set forth any fixed time limits and that a mere delay in submitting a communication in itself does not constitute an abuse of the right of its submission.
Grounds for detention must be clearly and exhaustively defined and the legality of detention must be open for challenge before a court andregular review within fixed time limits.
The Committee, or the Committee through a Working Group or a Rapporteur,may request the State party or the author of the communication to submit, within fixed time limits, additional written explanations or statements relevant to the issues of the admissibility or merits of a communication.
Any explanations or statements submitted by a State party pursuant to this rule shall be communicated, through the Secretary-General, to the author of the communication,who may submit any additional written information or observations within fixed time limits.
Despite acknowledging the jurisprudence of the Committee according to which the Optional Protocol does not set forth any fixed time limits for submitting a communication and delay in submitting does not amount to an abuse, the State party considers the forty years delay as an abuse of the right of submission of a communication to the Committee.
The other existing communications procedures establish similar rules for the transmission of communications and information provided by the parties in their rules of procedure,setting fixed time limits for comments and submissions.
While acknowledging that the Optional Protocol does not set forth any fixed time limits for submitting a communication to the Committee, the State party invokes the Committee's jurisprudence in Gobin v. Mauritius, where the Committee declared inadmissible a communication submitted five years after the alleged violation of the Covenant, as the author did not provide a"convincing explanation" to justify this delay.
The Committee, or the Committee through a Working Group or a Rapporteur, shall transmit to each party the submissions made by the other party pursuant to the present rule andshall afford each party an opportunity to comment on those submissions within fixed time limits.
As to the State party's argument that the submission of the communication to the Committee amounts to an abuse of the right of submission under article 3 of the Optional Protocol,the Committee notes that there are no fixed time limits for submission of communications under the Optional Protocol and that a mere delay in submission does not of itself, except in exceptional circumstances, involve an abuse of the right to submit a communication.
The Committee, in determining its views, may also rely on"any documentation from organizations in the United Nations system orother bodies" provided that the Committee affords the parties an opportunity to comment on the documentation or information within fixed time limits rule 72 2.
By an order dated 16 June 2014, the Court decided that the written pleadings in the case of Obligations concerning Negotiations relating to Cessation of the Nuclear Arms Race andto Nuclear Disarmament(Marshall Islands v. India) would first be addressed to the question of the jurisdiction of the Court, and fixed time limits for the filing of those pleadings(see paras. 209-213 below);
If the Committee is satisfied that the information received is reliable and appears to indicate serious violations of the provisions of the Convention by the State party concerned,the Committee, through the Secretary-General, shall invite the State party to submit observations with regard to that information within fixed time limits.
If the Committee is satisfied that the information is reliable and indicates grave or systematic violations of rights in the Convention, the Committee invites the State Party to cooperate in the examination of the information and to submit observations(OP, art. 8(1), andrule 82) on the information within fixed time limits rule 83 1.
If the Committee is satisfied that the information received is reliable and indicates grave or systematic violations of rights set forth in the Convention bythe State party concerned, the Committee shall invite the State party, through the Secretary-General, to submit observations with regard to that information within fixed time limits.
The Committee shall formulate its Views on the communication in the light of all documentation submitted to it by the author(s) of the communication, by the State party concerned, or by any other sources referred to in paragraph 1 of the present rule, provided that this information has been duly transmitted to the parties concerned andthat each party has been afforded an opportunity to comment thereon within fixed time limits.
The Committee may fix time limits for the submission of such individual opinions.
As for expulsion, this is an order issued by theMinistry of Governance and Police whereby a resident alien is required to leave the national territory within a fixed time limit.
Taking into account any observations that may have been submitted by the State party concerned, as well as other reliable information, the Committee may designate one or more of its members to conduct an inquiry andto make a report within a fixed time limit.
If the applicant fails to supply the requested materials within the specified time limit, or to alter the name of the selection achievement, orto submit a request for an extension of the fixed time limit, the application shall be deemed to have been withdrawn.
Under Act No. 229/1991, section 4, paragraph 1, andsection 13, paragraph 4, a Czechoslovak citizen was entitled to recover his/her legal title over land which had previously passed on to the State within a fixed time limit by 31 January 1993.
Such a request, however,will not release the State party from the requirement to submit information on the merits within the fixed time limit, unless the Committee, its Working Group or its designated Special Rapporteur decides to extend the time for submission of information on the merits until after the Committee has ruled on admissibility.
In the opinion, the advocate will state her or his findings and assess the circumstances of the case with regards to the existence of unequal treatment, may draw attention to irregularities found, recommend the method of their elimination andcall on the opposing party that within a fixed time limit it inform the advocate about its measures Article 27.