Examples of using Free software developers in English and their translations into Russian
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Nearly all free software developers share this motive.
Proceedings of the 11th conference for free software developers, pages 50-52.
Free software developers need to make advantages for each other.
McVoy made the program available gratis to free software developers.
Some free software developers prefer noncopyleft distribution.
I do not know even approximately how many paid free software developers there are;
Some free software developers make money by selling support services.
A non-free library that runs on free operating systems acts as a trap for free software developers.
Free software developers have been coping with this tendency for almost 20 years.
It exerted both moral suasion andpressure to discourage free software developers from copylefting their programs.
They wanted free software developers to donate their work for such use.
A nonfree library that runs on free operating systems acts as a trap for free software developers.
And we free software developers won't have any reliable way to avoid the problem.
Using the ordinary GPL for a library gives free software developers an advantage over proprietary developers: .
And we free software developers won't have any reliable way to avoid the problem.
If you cover them in one article together,people may get the idea that software patents are only bad for free software developers and they are okay for other software developers. .
Since the 1980s, free software developers have tried various methods of finding funds, with some success.
Several academic studies offree software hosting sites SourceForge and Savannah have shown what many free software developers who have put a codebase online already know first-hand.
Free software developers should strive to create functional, flexible software that serves its users well.
Once the Swedish Pirate Party had announced its platform, free software developers noticed this effect and began proposing a special rule for free software: .
Most free software developers would abandon such a plan given the prospect of a mass switch to someone else's corrected version.
Thus, the Pirate Party's proposal would give proprietary software developers the use of GPL-covered source code after 5 years, butit would not give free software developers the use of proprietary source code, not after 5 years or even 50 years.
Years ago, free software developers noticed this discomfort reaction, and some started exploring an approach for avoiding it.
When we apply the idea to the actual world,which contains both free software developers seeking cooperation, and proprietary software developers seeking domination, the consequences are very different.
Free software developers also stop maintaining old versions of their programs, but this is not unfair to users because the users of free software have control over it.
A couple of weeks ago, the Open Group changed the license of Motif,inviting free software developers to use it. However, the new Motif license does not fit either the definition of free software, or the looser definition of open source software. .
The free software developers realize that they had better- if they are going to make incompatible changes they are likely to make users unhappy and their versions are not going to be used.
The Debian Project is an association of Free Software developers who volunteer their time and effort in order to produce the completely free operating system Debian GNU/Linux.
Many Free Software developers saw the copyright assignment process used for most GNU components as a nuisance, but we arduously designed and redesigned the process to remove the onerousness.
On the issue of patents, free software developers can make common cause with most proprietary software developers, because in general they too stand to lose from patents.