Examples of using Indicator selection in English and their translations into Russian
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Various methods of aggregation/indicator selection.
The criteria for indicator selection were the following.
Available data differ from country to country,as do the stakeholder interests represented in indicator selection.
What changes should be made in the indicator selection to match the country's needs?
Hence, the indicator selection needs to accommodate these particularities while following coherent principles and criteria.
Issues included analytical frameworks, data quality, user groups, data aggregation,scale of analysis and indicator selection.
Criteria for indicator selection A more systematic approach to indicator selection is required.
Supported by international partners, decisions on the strategy map, indicator selection and scoring were made by consensus at high-level meetings.
Indicator selection that proceeds from the three-pillar view is faced with an almost infinite set of possibilities, all under the heading of"sustainable development information.
Using internationally accepted methodologies, standards andselection criteria limits the opportunities for agencies to unduly influence the indicator selection and interpretation.
This could be promoted by making indicator selection and reporting part of larger community development planning(CDP) efforts and associated decision-making.
The project aims to produce a framework for impact indicators for the GEF Land Degradation Focal Area,to be followed by indicator selection and long-term monitoring and evaluation activities.
Indicator selection and associated reporting requirements should be integrated into project financing guidelines and capacity-building measures should be planned where needed.
The task team is also working on identifying a set of criteria for indicator selection, against which the Inter-Agency and Expert Group will evaluate the current set of indicators. .
The rationale for the choice of indicators for each topic is explained with reference to the gender issues related to the topic, data availability,existing indicator frameworks and the criteria for indicator selection.
Section I of the report includes the framework for indicator selection, section II presents the summary of the proposed indicators, and section III provides an overview of issues requiring further work.
In order to ensure consistency and to further promote the integrated approach between global UNCCD progress assessment andlocal to national M&E efforts, indicator selection and associated reporting requirements should be integrated into project financing guidelines.
It is recommended that national/local indicator selection and reporting be fully and formally linked to national/local DLDD and SLM M&E efforts and be tied to NAP alignment efforts.
Review comprehensively all performance measures in strategic frameworks and compacts to improve linkages between objectives and expected accomplishments,including indicator selection e.g., establish indicator bank, focus on performance and quality, improve data collection methods.
In this paper, section I includes the framework for indicator selection, section II presents the summary of the proposed indicators, and section III provides an overview of issues requiring further work.
The testing reports were analysed to generate the following information: priorities that each country stated in order to achieve sustainable development, the Commission indicators tested(why they tested them and what problems they had in the process), new indicators proposed andthe criteria used by each country in the indicator selection.
The value of participation in progress indicator selection and reporting at the local level is the capacity for resultant M&E data to inform decision-making intended to improve livelihoods and overall well-being.
Such a group would be tasked with continuing the iterative,participatory contribution from the scientific community to the indicator selection, development and refinement process, subsequent monitoring and evaluation, and efforts to analyse, manage and use the data.
Recognizes that national/local indicator selection and reporting should be fully and formally linked to national action programme alignment efforts and reiterates outcome 2.2 of The Strategy by which affected Parties were requested to revise their national action programmes into strategic documents supported by biophysical and socio-economic baseline information(as reference for monitoring), and to include them in integrated investment frameworks;
The development of indicators, including methodology and indicator selection, and the provision of advice regarding the technical aspects of target-setting could both be assigned to an inter-agency expert group, with guidance from the Statistical Commission, as has been the case with the Millennium Development Goals framework.
The indicators selection criteria need to be representative, useful, scientific and applicable.
Labour-intensive indicators Selection of overly complex indicators requiring labour-intensive data-collection and analysis.
For each indicator, the background information(metadata) includes: the indicator's name, number and type(quantitative or qualitative), the rationale for the indicators' selection, the level of compliance of the indicator to the e-SMART criteria, the data required and the method of computation of these data, the unit of measurement, the data sources(or means of verification), the geographical level of application of the indicator, and the reporting entities in charge.
Benchmarks and indicators: selection of case studies(2008) and further testing(2009) in a limited number of countries.
The international practice of reporting MDGs accepts some modification of the indicators selection, formulation of objectives, and- in some cases- the goals, in order to take into consideration the diversity of development problems of specific countries.