Examples of using Its direct request in English and their translations into Russian
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
In its direct request in 2011, the Committee took note of the first report of the Government.
In the meantime, the following developments andissues noted by the Committee in its direct request of 1999 need to be taken into account.
In its direct request in 2011, the Committee noted that the Government report had not been received.
In the meantime, the following developments and issues noted by the Committee in its direct request of 1999 need to be taken into account.
In its direct request of 2004, the Committee analysed the Government's first report on the Convention.
The Committee noted, however, that the Government had replied to its direct request regarding application of the Act of 7 July 1998 by stating that it poses no major problems.
In its direct request in 2011, the Committee noted with regret that the Government's report had not been received.
Convention No. 175: In its direct request of 2003, the Committee noted that the term"part-time worker" was not defined in national laws or regulations.
In its direct request in 2011, the Committee noted that in 2009 the gender earnings gap had stagnated at around 12 per cent.
In its direct request in 2011, the Committee recalled the absence of sex as a prohibited ground of discrimination in article 24 of the Constitution.
In its direct request in 2011, the Committee of Experts noted the Government's indication that the draft Labour Code had not yet been adopted.
In its direct request in 2012, the Committee noted that a definition of discrimination had not been included in any relevant laws or regulations.
In its direct request in 2010, the Committee noted that the new Labour Law excluded from its scope certain groups of workers, including domestic workers.
In its direct request of this year, the Committee raised issues primarily related to the trafficking of children and the employment of children, including girls, in domestic work.
In its direct request in 2010, the Committee noted the Government's indication that the anti-discrimination provisions of the Labour Code had been amended in November 2008.
In its direct request in 2011, the Committee of Experts noted with regret that the Government's report had not been received and repeated its previous request. .
In its direct request in 2013, the Committee noted the Government's indication that a draft law on the remuneration of workers of state and municipal institutions was under consideration.
In its direct request in 2013, the Committee noted that the bill to amend the Act on Women Domestic Workers, which aimed to strengthen the rights of these workers, was in the process of being adopted.
In its direct request in 2011, the Committee recalled the lack of specific elaboration of grounds of discrimination and of a definition of direct and indirect discrimination in the Manpower Act.
In its direct request in 2012, the Committee of Experts noted the Government's indication that it had approved the resolution for the Action Plan for Gender Equality 2012-2015 in June 2012.
In its direct request in 2012, the Committee welcomed the adoption of the national minimum wage and recalled that this was an important means by which the Convention was applied.
In its direct request in 2012, the Committee noted that the Government's report did not contain a reply to its previous comment and therefore repeated its previous request. .
In its direct request, the Committee noted that the definition of remuneration under section 3 of the Labour Code partially applied the Convention definition, but failed to refer to indirect elements of remuneration.
Convention No. 111: In its direct request of 2002, the Committee noted that the draft Labour Code prohibits any discrimination on employment and occupation on all the grounds set forth in Article 1(1)(a) of the Convention.
In its direct request of 2002, the Committee noted that the Labour Protection Act, 1998, ensures equal wages in cases where the work is of the same nature and quality and equal quantity.
In its direct request in 2011, the Committee reiterated its previous direct request, noting the wage orders that established minimum wages for the various categories of workers in a number of sectors.
In its direct request of 2004, the Committee notes that the Labour Proclamation does not apply to employment in the civil service, the military, police and security forces, nor to judges and prosecutors and certain managerial positions.
In its direct request in 2012, the Committee noted the information from the Government concerning the employment programmes that it had implemented, including Trabaja Perú, which benefited 505,039 heads of family, of which 335,339 were women.
In its direct request of 2003 analysing Cambodia's first report on the Convention, the Committee primarily raised comments with respect to the provisions in the legislation relating to the notion of equal value and the definition of remuneration.
In its direct request in 2013, the Committee recalled that it had been commenting for a number of years on collective agreements that contained provisions discriminating against women, in particular with regard to particular benefits.