Examples of using Margin range in English and their translations into Russian
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The margin must be within the margin range.
The net remuneration margin range be revised from 110-120 to 120-130;
Remuneration levels could not be allowed to remain below the margin range any longer.
The revision of the margin range proposed by CCAQ should result in an upward adjustment of remuneration levels.
Restoration of the net remuneration margin at the mid-point of the margin range.
Other members endorsed the CCAQ proposal to revise the margin range from 110-120 to 120-130, while two others suggested that the matter be re-examined in 1998.
United Nations salaries would stand far below the mid-point of the margin range.
The members argued that bringing common system net remuneration back into the 110-120 margin range would be sufficient to restore common system competitiveness.
Had the Commission followed previous practice, andhad it taken into account the November 1995 adjustment, salaries would have been within the margin range.
The Assembly had on multiple occasions reiterated the margin range and the desirable midpoint.
Post adjustment increases at the base were granted only on the basis of the procedures for operating the post adjustment system within the margin range.
This was seen by some members as further indication that a margin range of 10 to 20 was not realistic.
It recalled in that regard that, when the five-year average margin was established, the annual margin was near the top of the margin range.
These would bring United Nations remuneration into the middle of the margin range approved by the General Assembly.
On the recommendations of the Commission, the margin range of 110 to 120 had been established and the procedures for operation of post adjustment within that range were set up.
The organizations considered that those proposals,including the adjustment of the margin range, should be revisited.
Those arguing for retention of the existing margin range repeated views expressed earlier in respect of consideration of the reference studies and the best-paid studies.
United Nations pay levels be set at the bottom of the revised margin range of 120 as from 1 January 1998;
An upward adjustment of the margin range itself in order to begin to close the gap between United Nations remuneration and a range of national and international, public and private comparators;
One of the options considered by the Commission was adjustment of the margin range to fully account for the expatriation factor.
In order to ensure that the relationship between the net remuneration in the two civil services remained within acceptable limits, the General Assembly,in its resolution 40/244, had approved, in 1985, a margin range of 110 to 120.
On the basis of available information this would have given a revised margin range vis-à-vis the United States of 120 to 130.
The margin range should be revised in order to obtain, over an appropriate period, remuneration levels reflective more of the other international organizations and of the private sector in the country of the comparator civil service.
The existing technical measures for operating the post adjustment system within the approved margin range were producing the desired results.
When the margin range of 110 to 120 had been adopted, it had been with the understanding that the Commission would act to prevent the margin from exceeding 120 and would recommend a salary increase should the margin fall below 110.
Over an appropriate period of time, United Nations remuneration levels should be brought to the mid-point of the revised margin range, namely 125.
FICSA would request the Fifth Committee to increase the margin range, with immediate application of a new mid-point of 125, in accordance with Assembly resolution 52/216 of 22 December 1997, in which the General Assembly acknowledged its option of margin management.
The Commission's secretariat pointed out the hypothetical nature of such margin levels in view of the 110 to 120 margin range approved by the General Assembly.
The proposal of the Consultative Committee on Administrative Questions(CCAQ) that the margin range should be revised to comply with the Noblemaire principle on the basis of a comparison of the United States and German civil service indices should be given due consideration.
CCAQ saw those international organizations, which were competitors for staff, as important reference points,among others, in a formula on which the margin range would be based.