Examples of using Subsequent acceptance in English and their translations into Russian
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Welcomes the finalization of a new draft constitution in February 2009 and its subsequent acceptance by referendum in May 2009;
The subsequent acceptance of the Slovak Republic as a member of the Group and its membership in the Zangger Committee are further steps in our support of nuclear safety.
A reservation expressly authorized by a treaty does not require any subsequent acceptance by the other contracting States unless the treaty so provides.
Mr. HANSON(Canada) said that his delegation felt unable to accept the suggestion by the representative of Colombia that unilaterally imposed conditions could be discussed with a view to their subsequent acceptance or non-acceptance.
A reservation of this nature does not require any subsequent acceptance by the States concerned, unless the treaty so provides see article 20(1) of the Vienna Convention 1969.
Charles, who pursues Dorothy Stratten's character, wears director Peter Bogdanovich's trademark oversized plastic-framed eyeglasses,perhaps a reference to Bogdanovich's initial guilt and subsequent acceptance of his love for Stratten.
Only reservations that are actually covered by this prior agreement do not require subsequent acceptance, and are thus, logically established from the moment they are permissibly made.
This is quite clear from article 19(b) of the Conventions, which concerns treaties that provide"that only specified reservations… may be made", or article 20, paragraph 1,which stipulates that"a reservation expressly authorized by a treaty does not require any subsequent acceptance.
According to article 20, paragraph 1, of the Vienna Conventions, expressly authorized reservations do not require"subsequent" acceptance by the other contracting States and contracting organizations.
In these circumstances, nothing in the nature of a quid pro quo, nor any subsequent acceptance of the declaration, nor even any reply or reaction from other States, is required for the declaration to take effect, for this would be inconsistent with the strictly unilateral nature of the juridical act by which the pronouncement of the State was made.
A first exception was set out in article 20, paragraph 1, of the 1969 and 1986 Vienna Conventions, according to which"[a]reservation expressly authorized by a treaty does not require any subsequent acceptance by the other contracting States[…] unless the treaty so provides.
A reservation expressly authorized by a treaty does not require any subsequent acceptance by the contracting States and contracting organizations or, as the case may be, by the contracting organizations unless the treaty so provides.
However, the question arises as to whether, by a declaration which contains a substantive act other than an undertaking, a State may contract unilateral obligations under conditions which are the same as those noted above and which apply to the case of an undertaking:that is, whether subsequent acceptance is not necessary for them to be effective either.
Only reservations that are actually covered by this prior agreement do not require subsequent acceptance, and are thus, logically established from the moment they are permissibly made.
However, this paragraph 1 does not mean that the reservation is exempt from the requirement for the contracting parties' assent; it simply expresses the idea that, since the parties have given their assent even before the formulation of the reservation, andhave done so in the text of the treaty itself, subsequent acceptance is superfluous.
The first paragraph indicated the specificity of the establishment of such a reservation,which was the fact that no subsequent acceptance by the other contracting States and contracting organizations was required to that effect, unless the treaty so provided.
However, paragraph 1 does not imply that the reservation is exempt from the requirement of the contracting States' and contracting organizations' assent; it simply expresses the idea that, since they have given their assent even before theformulation of the reservation, and have done so in the text of the treaty itself, any subsequent acceptance is superfluous.
In these circumstances,nothing in the nature of a quid pro quo nor any subsequent acceptance of the declaration, nor even any reply or reaction from other States, is required for the declaration to take effect, since such a requirement would be inconsistent with the strictly unilateral nature of the juridical act by which the pronouncement by the State was made.
In the context ofan investment arbitration dispute, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has confirmed that the requirement of an exchange of documents within the meaning of article II of the Convention is fulfilled by an offer to arbitrate contained in a bilateral investment treaty and its subsequent acceptance by an investor in the Request for Arbitration.
In these circumstances, nothing in the nature of a quid pro quo nor any subsequent acceptance of the declaration, nor even any reply or reaction from other States, is required for the declaration to take effect, since such a requirement would be inconsistent with the strictly unilateral nature of the juridical act by which the pronouncement by the State was made.
Aware of the 2002 report of the Constitutional Modernization Review Commission, which contained a draft constitution for the consideration of the people of the Territory, the 2003 draft constitution offered by the administering Power and the subsequent discussions between the Territory and the administering Power in 2003, and the reopening of discussions between the administering Power and the territorial Government on internal constitutional modernization,in 2006, which resulted in the finalization of a new draft constitution in February 2009 and its subsequent acceptance by referendum in May 2009.
Nothing in the nature of a quid pro quo nor any subsequent acceptance of the declaration, nor even any reply or reaction from other States, is required for the declaration to the effect, since such a requirement would be inconsistent with the strictly unilateral nature of the juridical act by which the pronouncement by the State was made”. Loc. cit(supra note 42), para. 43.
Acceptance, subsequent dispatch and follow-up of shipments on request of the client.
Non-binding instruments do not require subsequent ratification or acceptance procedures and might lead to swifter implementation of commitments.
It must be emphasized that a State formulates a unilateral legal act with the express intention of creating a new legal relationship, including, as has been indicated, obligations for that State.Such obligations are autonomous when they produce effects irrespective of their acceptance by the addressee State or of any subsequent attitude or conduct which may signify such acceptance.
Silence on the part of one or more parties can, when the circumstances call for some reaction,constitute acceptance of the subsequent practice.
In order todetermine which"expressly authorized" reservations do not require subsequent unilateral acceptance, it is thus appropriate to determine which reservations the parties have already consented to in the treaty.
In particular, it was pointed out that there could be differences between the two regimes in terms of the temporal limits for formulation,conditions of form and subsequent reactions acceptance or objection.
In the first week of September 2016 took place the acceptance procedure and subsequent shipment of one of the largest Kaplan turbine runners ever manufactured at ČKD Blansko.
Ermash's replacement reacted skeptically to the pleas, and the subsequent process from approval to acceptance of the film's actors, was accompanied by considerable difficulties.