Examples of using Their implementation plans in English and their translations into Russian
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Participants will also be able to exchange experiences and share their implementation plans.
Encourages those parties that have not transmitted their implementation plans within the deadlines to do so as soon as possible;
Ninetyseven per cent of those indicated that those measures were part of their implementation plans.
Eighty per cent of those mentioned the measures in their implementation plans transmitted to the Conference of the Parties.
Sixtyfour per cent of those Parties indicated that those measures were reflected in their implementation plans.
People also translate
Alternatively, management should revisit their implementation plans to ensure that in future realistic target dates are set.
During the last four years, projects have included a communications strategy in their implementation plans.
To remind those Parties which have not yet transmitted their implementation plans, the deadline for which has passed, to do so as soon as possible;
Ninetyone per cent of those Parties indicated that those measures were part of their implementation plans.
Report on the priorities identified by Parties in their implementation plans transmitted to the Conference of the Parties pursuant to Article 7 of the Convention.
This an issue that may require clear guidance for Parties to follow in developing their implementation plans.
Parties shall consider updating their implementation plans taking into account, among other things, the findings of studies and scientific and technical developments;
Therefore, the deadline for the first fifty Parties to submit their implementation plans is 17 May 2006.
As at 31 January 2013, 141 parties transmitted their implementation plans addressing the initial 12 persistent organic pollutants listed under the Convention.
Twentyfive per cent of the Parties that reported indicated that they had encountered difficulties in implementing their implementation plans.
The deadline for the first 50 Parties to transmit their implementation plans was, therefore, 17 May 2006.
Under the Stockholm Convention,developing country parties and parties with economies in transition can access funding through the Global Environment Facility to develop their implementation plans.
Of the Parties that reported, 86 per cent have also transmitted their implementation plans to the Conference of the Parties.
If revised implementation plans are submitted for a second phase of activities,this would increase demands for financial resources from the current group of eligible Parties that have already submitted their implementation plans.
Of those, 52 per cent indicated that the strategies were part of their implementation plans while 25 per cent indicated that they were not.
Of the Parties that reported, 98 per cent indicated that they had developed implementation plans pursuant to Article 7 of the Convention and61 per cent indicated that they had received financial assistance from the Global Environment Facility to develop their implementation plans.
Eightysix per cent of those Parties mentioned the information exchange mechanism in their implementation plans transmitted to the Conference of the Parties.
Of the remaining 70 Parties that have yet to submit their implementation plans, several have large populations and would likely have sizeable resource needs e.g., Bangladesh, Brazil, Colombia, India, Nigeria, Pakistan, South Africa and Venezuela.
The Board reviewed the progress made by funds andprogrammes against the milestones set out in their implementation plans and found that some entities were behind schedule.
Discussion of the future needs of Parties eligible for assistance from the Convention's financial mechanism can be based on this data, recognizing that the figures represent an upper limit of the resource estimates for Ukraine andfor the 67 Parties that have submitted their implementation plans.
As at 27 November 2014, 157 parties had transmitted their implementation plans addressing the initial 12 persistent organic pollutants listed under the Convention.
The need for financial assistance could present a timing challenge for those developing countries andcountries with economies in transition that would like to begin to develop their implementation plans before the convention enters into force.
As of 27 December 2005, the following Parties had transmitted their implementation plans: Bolivia, Latvia, the Republic of Moldova and the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia.
Introducing the subitem, the representative of the Secretariat outlined the action taken to date in accordance with decision SC-1/12 andpresented a list of Parties that had transmitted their implementation plans to the Secretariat by 1 May 2006.
To encourage Parties that have not finalized their implementation plans pursuant to Article 7 of the Convention to ensure that the guidance for assisting countries in the preparation of national implementation plans, as adopted by the Conference of the Parties in its decision SC-1/12, is fully taken into account and thus reflected in their respective action plans and strategies;
