Examples of using These doctrines in English and their translations into Russian
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Moreover, now these"doctrines" begin contradicting each other.
Plans to modernize nuclear forces have reinforced these doctrines.
These doctrines contain the teachings of Esoteric philosophy, and this must suffice.
Create, Mogoth, create an atmosphere of hatred andhostility between followers of these doctrines.
That is, these doctrines are sufficient to guarantee the salvation of the Christian.
According to the advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice(ICJ), these doctrines contravene international law.
These doctrines are being used to justify retention and possible use of nuclear weapons.
What is the perceived effect that these doctrines and new types of weapons will have on the granting of NSAs?
These doctrines would grant to individuals or social groups the right to determine what is good or evil.
It is therefore necessary to update or modify them, in the thinking of the main proponents of these"doctrines.
Islam rejects both of these doctrines and offers a different account of what happened at the cross and afterwards.
State Governments must be constrained from the illegal taking of indigenous lands, territories andresources justified by these doctrines.
These doctrines are being used to justify the continued retention and the option of possible use of nuclear weapons.
In the different regions of the world,"assumed" sovereign powers continue to be abused by States that derived justification by these doctrines.
In interpreting these doctrines the courts have indicated the paramount interest is to ensure that patents issue from“backgrounds free from fraud or other inequitable conduct”.
The end of the cold war and the emergence of an increasingly interdependent world linked by the imperatives of economy, commerce andtechnology challenge the logic of these doctrines.
The influence of these doctrines was unsuccessfully combated both by the imperial efforts of Ch'in Shih Huang Ti and by the teachings of Mo Ti, who proclaimed a brotherhood founded not on ethical duty but on the love of God.
Given to such provisions, we wonder how the international community can develop confidence-building measures for disarmament andnonproliferation if we are bogged down in processes marked by deep mistrust exacerbated by these doctrines.
In many regions of the world, these doctrines are institutionalized in law and policy, at the national and international levels, and lie at the root of the violations of indigenous peoples' individual and collective human rights.
Thus the followers of the Prasanga School are nearer to Esoteric Buddhism than are the YogBchBryas; for their views are those of the most secret Schools, andonly the echo of these doctrines is heard in the Yamya-ngshapda and other works in public circulation and use.
In fact these doctrines confirm continued reliance on nuclear weapons to be an integral part of national security, thereby undermining previous commitments made under the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons.
While the earlier Trinity portrayals were brought to India by the Sethite priests, the later ideas of the Trinity were imported by the Salem missionaries andwere developed by the native intellects of India through a compounding of these doctrines with the evolutionary triad conceptions.
In fact, these doctrines confirm continued reliance on nuclear weapons to be an integral part of national security, thereby undermining previous commitments made under the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons.
These doctrines, heavily influenced by changes in the domestic politics of leading member States, created competing and sometimes superseding free market priorities for such organizations as the EU and even affected the ILO's more social-democratic ethos.
Given that these doctrines do not reject the use of such weapons, MERCOSUR member and associated States support the conclusion of a legally binding international instrument through which nuclear-weapon States commit themselves not to use, or threaten to use, these weapons against countries that do not have them.
On the basis of its commitment to these doctrines and the principles of the Charter of the United Nations, the United Arab Emirates believes that the way to end the occupation of its three islands-- Greater Tumb, Lesser Tumb and Abu Moussa-- by the Islamic Republic of Iran is by peaceful means that would spare the region from the atrocities of warfare from which its people have suffered for the past three decades.
What is even more serious is that these doctrines assert a readiness to use nuclear weapons not only against other nuclear-weapon States but urbi et orbi, against anyone, and in order to prevent real or ostensible threats posed by weapons, including non-nuclear weapons, invoking an alleged right of preventive self-defence that is not recognized by international law, and ignoring the fact that even self-defence and reprisals must be governed by the principles of necessity and proportionality.
Show them, how pleasant it's to seek for these absurd in doctrines of others.
Governments must enforce laws against discrimination, violence andother manifestations of these evil doctrines, but political and religious leaders should not ask courts to become the policemen of thought or expression.