Examples of using Welcomed draft in English and their translations into Russian
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Italy welcomed draft article 21 on State responsibility.
Mr. McDonald(Ireland), referring to chapter VII of the Commission's report,said that Ireland welcomed draft articles 17 to 24, on circumstances precluding wrongfulness.
Some delegations welcomed draft article 1 proposed by the Special Rapporteur.
It welcomed draft article 5 bis(Forms of cooperation), which clarified draft article 5(Duty to cooperate), and supported the view of the European Union that the draft articles should mention the obligation of international actors to cooperate.
He was satisfied with draft article 2, paragraph 2, in that it took into account the criterion of the purpose of a contract or transaction,and also welcomed draft article 11, on contracts of employment, whereby a State could invoke jurisdictional immunity if the contract was related to the exercise of governmental authority.
People also translate
Some delegations welcomed draft article 5 as reformulated by the 2005 Working Group on Shared Natural Resources.
As for protection of persons in the event of disasters, her delegation welcomed draft article 9, which stressed the primary responsibility of the affected State for the protection of persons and provision of humanitarian assistance on its territory.
Her delegation welcomed draft article 7, which related to categories of treaty whose object and purpose involved the necessary implication that they continued in operation during an armed conflict.
With regard to the five draft articles provisionally adopted by the Drafting Committee,his delegation welcomed draft article 5 bis, which established the forms that cooperation under the draft articles could take, and agreed with its content and its placement as an additional paragraph elaborating on draft article 5 Duty to cooperate.
Her delegation welcomed draft article 5, as it clarified that international law determined whether or not an act of an international organization was wrongful.
Some delegations welcomed draft article 15, and expressed support for its current formulation.
Some delegations welcomed draft article 1, setting forth the scope of the draft articles.
Several delegations welcomed draft article 5 bis, as provisionally adopted by the Drafting Committee in 2012.
Many delegations welcomed draft guideline 1.1(Definition of reservations) as combining all the elements contained in the three Vienna Conventions.
The Nordic countries welcomed draft article 14(Termination of assistance) as proposed by the Special Rapporteur, although it might require further elaboration.
His delegation welcomed draft article 5 ter, which provided that cooperation extended to measures to be taken with the intent to reduce the risk of disasters.
His delegation welcomed draft resolution A/C.5/47/L.45 as a means of assuring a stable financial basis for the proper implementation of the mandate entrusted to UNFICYP.
Several delegations welcomed draft article D1, dealing with the implementation of the expulsion decision, particularly as it encouraged States to facilitate the voluntary departure of aliens being expelled.
His delegation particularly welcomed draft conclusion 4, and paragraphs(9),(10) and(11) of the commentary thereto, which provided an instructive explanation of the relationship between article 31, paragraphs 3(a) and(b), and article 32.
His delegation welcomed draft article 9, which reflected new trends in international environmental law, and commended the approach adopted in draft article 12, which provided significant guidance to States.
His delegation welcomed draft guideline 3.4.2 which, unlike the original draft guideline 3.4, established conditions for the permissibility of objections based on the effects intended by the objecting State.
His delegation welcomed draft conclusion 1, in particular paragraph 5, which stressed that the interpretation of a treaty was a"single combined operation" and that different weight would need to be accorded to the different means of interpretation depending on the circumstances.
Lastly, his delegation welcomed draft guideline 2.6.10 regarding the reasons for objections, which constituted an important innovation in comparison with the Vienna Convention, and supported the Special Rapporteur's idea of including a recommendation concerning the reasons for reservations in the Guide to Practice.
His delegation therefore welcomed draft article 17(Facilitation of external assistance), which provided that the affected State should take the necessary measures to facilitate external assistance, including in fields such as privileges and immunities for civilian and military relief personnel.
His delegation welcomed draft resolution A/C.6/51/L.6 entitled"1999 action dedicated to the centennial of the first International Peace Conference and to the closing of the United Nations Decade of International Law", and endorsed the aim of drafting a"programme of action" set forth in paragraph 1 thereof.
While some delegations welcomed draft guideline 4.2.5, dealing with non-reciprocal application of obligations to which a reservation relates, clarification was sought on whether, in those situations where reciprocity did not apply, the author of a reservation was entitled to invoke the obligation concerned by the reservation and require the other parties to fulfil it.
It therefore welcomed draft resolution A/47/L.56, on the participation of the United Nations in the proposed international civilian mission to Haiti, which was fully consistent with the need to revitalize the General Assembly, especially in respect of activities of an extraordinary nature, as recognized by the Secretary-General in his statement of programme budget implications A/C.5/47/93, para. 17.
Mr. Normandin(Canada)(spoke in French): Canada welcomes draft resolution A/61/L.25 on Afghanistan.
We also welcome draft resolution A/64/L.6*, which was introduced by the Permanent Representative of Guatemala.
We welcome draft resolution A/C.1/58/L.15.
