Examples of using Cross-border processing in English and their translations into Slovak
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Official/political
-
Computer
-
Programming
Cross-border processing and transfers.
Article 4(23) of the Regulations defines“cross-border processing” as.
Cross-border processing and transfers.
In addition, the scope of the Framework Decision is limited to cross-border processing activities.
(23) cross-border processing means either.
Free flow of personaldata within the Union when those conditions apply to cross-border processing of such data.
Cross-border processing of personal data.
However, this should not prevent the free movement of personal data within the Union,when those conditions apply to cross-border processing of such data.
Cross-border processing of personal data.
Does it make a difference if the controller of the cross-border processing does not have its main establishment in that member state, but has another establishment there?
Cross-border processing of your personal data.
The Board will not only issue guidelines on how to interpret core concepts of GDPR butwill also issue binding decisions on disputes regarding cross-border processing.
Home»Cross-border processing and transfers»Cross-border processing. .
The European Data Protection Board will not only issue guidelines on how to interpret core concepts of the Regulation but will also be called on toissue binding decisions on disputes regarding cross-border processing.
Home»Cross-border processing and transfers»Cross-border processing. .
The European Data Protection Board will not only issue guidelines on how to interpret core conceptsof the Regulation but will also be called on to issue binding decisions on disputes regarding cross-border processing.
Home»Cross-border processing and transfers»Cross-border processing. .
Moreover, the one-stop-shop mechanism will provide for a single interlocutor for the controllers andprocessors in relation to their cross-border processing, including binding decisions in disputes by the newly established European Data Protection Board.
Home»Cross-border processing and transfers»Cross-border processing. .
Three Member States(e.g. Bulgaria, Portugal, Lithuania) added that they had also adopted specific legislation to implement certain provisions of the Framework Decision not covered by the general legislation,which only apply to cross-border processing of personal data13.
Does it make a difference if the controller of this cross-border processing does not have its main establishment in that Member State but has another establishment in this Member State?
Notwithstanding Article 55, the supervisory authority of the main or the only installation of the controller orthe processor is competent to act as chief supervisory authority for cross-border processing operations of the controller or the processor in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 60.
Home»Cross-border processing and transfers» Transfers to third countries or international organization»Transfers on the basis of an adequacy decision Transfers on the basis of an adequacy decision.
They are not alwaysable to easily distinguish between purely domestic and cross-border processing or to foresee whether certain personal data may become the object of a cross-border exchange at a later stage(see Section 2 below).
Without prejudice to Article 55, the supervisory authority of the main establishment or of the single establishment of the controller orprocessor shall be competent to act as lead supervisory authority for the cross-border processing carried out by that controller or processor in accordance with the procedure provided in Article 60.
The Board will not only issue guidelines on the interpretation of core concepts of the GDPR, butalso be called to rule by binding decisions on disputes regarding cross-border processing, ensuring therefore a uniform application of EU rules to avoid the same case potentially being dealt with differently across various jurisdictions.
If the previous questions are answered in the affirmative, could the outcome of such proceedings prevent the lead supervisory authority from reaching a conclusion to the contrary, in the event that the lead supervisory authority investigates the same orsimilar cross-border processing activities in accordance with the mechanism laid down in Articles 56 and 60 of the GDPR?
The EDPB is not only issuing guidelines on the interpretation of core concepts of the GDPR but also has thepower to rule by binding decisions on disputes regarding cross-border processing, ensuring therefore a uniform application of EU rules to avoid the same case potentially being dealt with differently across various jurisdictions.
If the response to the previous questions is positive, could the result of such proceedings obstruct a contrary finding of a lead supervisory authority, where the lead supervisory authority would be investigating the same or similar cross-border processing activities in accordance with the mechanism of the GDPR which determines the competence of andcooperation between supervisory authorities in the context of cross-border processing activities?
The Board is not only issuing guidelines on the interpretation of core concepts of the GDPR but it is alsocalled to rule by binding decisions on disputes regarding cross-border processing activities, ensuring therefore a uniform application of EU rules to avoid the same case potentially being dealt with differently across various jurisdictions.