Examples of using Undertaking in question in English and their translations into Slovak
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Official/political
-
Computer
-
Programming
Are appropriate to the nature and size of the undertaking in question.
The undertaking in question had not had access to those documents during the procedure before the Commission.
That is the case where it is proved that the undertaking in question was aware of the unlawful.
This notion of independence isrelated to the degree of competitive constraint exerted on the undertaking in question.
Where the activities of the undertaking in question are confined to the SGEI, all its costs may be taken into consideration.
Any decision to withdraw authorization shall be supported by precise reasons andcommunicated to the undertaking in question.'.
The railway undertaking in question may continue operations, unless the licensing authority decides that safety is jeopardised.
Any decision to withdraw an authorisation shall be supported by precise reasons andnotified to the assurance undertaking in question.
Any decision to refuse an authorisation shall be accompanied by the precise grounds for doing so andnotified to the undertaking in question.
Public service obligations" means obligations which the transport undertaking in question, if it were considering its own commercial interests, would not assume or would not assume to the same extent or under the same conditions.
The Commission itself admitted, at the hearing, that, in principle, even‘exclusivity rebates' could be justified by the undertaking in question.
(13) In order for Article 106(2) of the Treaty to apply, the undertaking in question must have been specifically entrusted by the Member State with the operation of a particular service of general economic interest.
Refusal of authorisation Any decision to refuse an authorisation shall be accompanied by the precise grounds for doing so andnotified to the undertaking in question.
That is the case where it is proved that the undertaking in question was aware of the unlawful conduct of the other participants, or that it could reasonably have foreseen that conduct, and that it was prepared to accept the risk.
It is necessary to define the undertaking held accountable for a breach of Article 101 TFEU by identifying one ormore legal persons that represent the undertaking in question.
It is also not satisfied where the distortion of competition within theinternal market cannot be imputed to the undertaking in question, since those harmful effects were not foreseeable to it.
Where the undertaking in question is authorized to cover the risks classified in class 18 in point A of the Annex, supervision shall extend to monitoring of the technical resources which the undertaking has at its disposal for the purpose of carrying out the assistance operations it has undertaken to perform, where the law of the home Member State provides for the monitoring of such resources.
The assessment of the relevant circumstances should,taken as a whole, allow us to ascertain, to the requisite degree of likelihood, that the undertaking in question has abused its dominant position contrary to Article 102 TFEU.
Fourthly, and lastly, the case-law relating to pricing and margin squeeze practices requires, as the appellant rightly points out,consideration of all the circumstances in order to determine whether the undertaking in question has abused its dominant position.
Relying on the case-law devolving from Hoffmann-La Roche, the General Court considered that,in order to determine whether the undertaking in question has abused its dominant position, it was sufficient that the rebates were‘exclusivity rebates' belonging to category 2.
As regards point(a)▌of the second subparagraph, with respect to electricity obtained via an electricity exchange or imported from an undertaking situated outside the Union,aggregate figures provided by the exchange or the undertaking in question over the preceding year may be used.
As the Advocate General observed in points 116 to 118 of his Opinion, the Court of First Instance was therefore right,in checking compliance with the condition that the undertaking in question must be individually concerned for the purposes of the fourth paragraph of Article 230 EC, to ascertain whether Kronofrance could be considered an‘interested party' in terms of Article 88(2) EC and Article 1(h) of.
With respect to electricity obtained via an electricity exchange or imported from an undertaking located outside the EU,aggregate figures provided by the exchange or the undertaking in question over the preceding year may be used.
By its first question, the national court asks, essentially, whether Article 31(2) of the Charter or Article 7(1) of Directive 2003/88 must be interpreted as precluding national legislation or practice,such as a social plan agreed between the undertaking in question and its works council, under which the paid annual leave of a worker on short-time working is calculated according to the rule of pro rata temporis.
As regards points(a) and(b) of the first subparagraph with respect to electricity obtained via an electricity exchange or imported from an undertaking situated outside the Ö Union Õ Community,aggregate figures provided by the exchange or the undertaking in question over the preceding year may be used.
Where only the insurance undertakings of that non-member country are subject to such provisions, the notional own-funds requirement on the related reinsurance undertaking and the elements eligible to satisfy thatnotional requirement may be calculated as if the undertaking in question were a related insurance undertaking of that non-member country.