Examples of using Representative asked in English and their translations into Spanish
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
I do not think that representative asked for a vote.
One representative asked for a clearer presentation of the benefits of each of the three options.
When we presented our plans to make the game to Nintendo, the first thing the representative asked was if it would include the Rebel Army Theme 17!
One representative asked that UNCTAD provide more detailed analysis of the effects of the crises on Africa.
In the special framework of the tenth anniversary of the Durban Declaration andProgramme of Action, the representative asked OHCHR what obstacles had been met in implementing the recommendations adopted during the eighth session of the Working Group.
People also translate
The representative asked other countries to be vigilant about the emergence of this variety of cannabis.
In relation to the work of the Refrigeration, AirConditioning and Heat Pumps Technical Options Committee,one representative asked to what extent the information on new technologies and related matters was updated in consultation with producers and other representatives of industry.
One representative asked for the total sums granted to each Party and globally for critical-use exemptions to be indicated.
Following the presentation, one representative asked for further details on how many members of the Panel and its subsidiary bodies there were from parties operating under paragraph 1 of article 5 in each region.
The representative asked for clarification and rewording of some of the terms used in the draft area programme document.
Prior to the adoption of the agenda,one representative asked whether a single intersessional meeting of the Working Group would be sufficient to advise and assist the Conference in the implementation of its mandate on asset recovery.
One representative asked for information on how substances had been classified with regard to global warming potential.
Another representative asked what could be done to increase the number of members from parties operating under paragraph 1 of article 5.
The representative asked for clarification and rewording of some of the terms used in the draft area programme document.
The representative asked why the first paragraph was not confined to State-owned media as was the case for the second paragraph.
One representative asked UNCTAD to provide more information about alternatives to reform the investor- State dispute settlement mechanism.
Another representative asked for comments from the Panel on the use of absorption coolers, with particular reference to costs and environmental impacts.
One representative asked how the proposed amendments would affect the way in which the Montreal Protocol worked with the Framework Convention on Climate Change.
Another representative asked whether a decision adopted by the Meeting of the Parties could overrule the obligation of the Parties under the provisions of the Protocol.
The representative asked for clarification concerning the nature of the"special mechanism" to reopen the discussion on reparations referred to in the recommendations.
One representative asked why every Party whose status of non-compliance was under discussion by the Implementation Committee should not be invited to present their case.
One representative asked for a detailed explanation of the components of the approval process and the indicators used by the Committee when assessing critical-use nominations.
One representative asked why three categories were described in the presentation- low GWP, moderate GWP and high GWP- whereas the report described a much larger number of categories.
The representative asked whether those revised application rates had also been applied in assessing nominations for critical uses using the hot-gas application method.
The representative asked the United Nations to help satisfy the aspirations of the indigenous people, while offering lasting prospects for all New Caledonians.
One representative asked that care be taken to ensure that such a joint arrangement did not weaken the leadership capacity needed by the Stockholm Convention in its inaugural period.
Another representative asked what happened when the funding requirements of humanitarian agencies were not met, and suggested that the impact of underfunding should be clearly demonstrated.
One representative asked whether putting forth the draft decision did not constitute an implicit acknowledgment that previous funding from parties not operating under paragraph 1 of article 5 had been inadequate.
One representative asked whether decision XXI/6 could be reviewed and the relevant deadlines extended for a reasonable period of time to allow countries to detect any uses in hitherto unidentified areas and take necessary measures.
One representative asked for further information on the number of kilotonnes of ozone-depleting substances that had been phased out in the 2003- 2005 triennium, the amount due to be phased out in the next, and how much related to carbon tetrachloride.