Examples of using Representative asked in English and their translations into Russian
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The representative asked how the situations of natural disasters would be handled.
If it was not possible to consider the matter at the current session, the representative asked for the matter to be forwarded to the Conference of the Parties for consideration at its ninth meeting.
One representative asked for a clearer presentation of the benefits of each of the three options.
Noting that according to the latest census data the annual population growth rate was 2.3 per cent andnot 2.77 per cent as indicated in the document(DP/FPA/PAK/6), the representative asked that a correction be made.
Another representative asked whether projects funded by the GEF would be included in Climex.
People also translate
On the understanding that there was no alternative to halon in certain civil-aviation air frames, one representative asked for more information on discussions with the International Civil Aviation Organization(ICAO) in that regard.
Another representative asked whether the standards were seen as targets or mandatory.
In the special framework of the tenth anniversary of the Durban Declaration andProgramme of Action, the representative asked OHCHR what obstacles had been met in implementing the recommendations adopted during the eighth session of the Working Group.
One representative asked for greater clarity on the type of information to be reported under the draft decision.
Noting that the report of the Executive Committee of the Multilateral Fund, contained in document UNEP/OzL. Pro.WG.1/33/5,also dealt with process agent emissions, another representative asked whether the Technology and Economic Assessment Panel and the Multilateral Fund had consulted each other.
The representative asked for clarification and rewording of some of the terms used in the draft area programme document.
In relation to the work of the Refrigeration, AirConditioning and Heat Pumps Technical Options Committee,one representative asked to what extent the information on new technologies and related matters was updated in consultation with producers and other representatives of industry.
Another representative asked what could be done to increase the number of members from parties operating under paragraph 1 of article 5.
Regarding the foams sector, one representative asked about the level of penetration of lowGWP foams in developed countries that were not members of the European Union.
One representative asked for the total sums granted to each Party and globally for critical-use exemptions to be indicated.
Prior to the adoption of the agenda, one representative asked whether a single intersessional meeting of the Working Group would be sufficient to advise and assist the Conference in the implementation of its mandate on asset recovery.
One representative asked whether a breakdown of costs had been undertaken and asked how cooperation with the Kyoto Protocol was envisaged.
Another representative asked if carbon dioxide was a suitable refrigerant for countries with ambient temperatures of 30- 40 °C.
Another representative asked whether the Meeting could communicate its decision directly to the Secretary-General of the United Nations.
One representative asked for information on how substances had been classified with regard to global warming potential.
Another representative asked for comments from the Panel on the use of absorption coolers, with particular reference to costs and environmental impacts.
A representative asked whether technically feasible, commercially available alternatives to HFCs were more numerous than alternatives to CFCs had been 20 years earlier.
The representative asked for clarification concerning the nature of the"special mechanism" to reopen the discussion on reparations referred to in the recommendations.
One representative asked UNCTAD to provide more information about alternatives to reform the investor-State dispute settlement mechanism.
One representative asked how the proposed amendments would affect the way in which the Montreal Protocol worked with the Framework Convention on Climate Change.
One representative asked how UNEP proposed to marshal all of the multilateral institutions involved in environmental governance under a single framework.
Another representative asked whether a decision adopted by the Meeting of the Parties could overrule the obligation of the Parties under the provisions of the Protocol.
One representative asked why three categories were described in the presentation- low GWP, moderate GWP and high GWP- whereas the report described a much larger number of categories.
One representative asked for a detailed explanation of the components of the approval process and the indicators used by the Committee when assessing critical-use nominations.
One representative asked that care be taken to ensure that such a joint arrangement did not weaken the leadership capacity needed by the Stockholm Convention in its inaugural period.