Примеры использования A separation of powers на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The Constitution provides for a separation of powers.
The lack of a separation of powers in the Charter is compounded by the fact that each UN organ determines the scope of its own competence under the Charter.
This is a system of checks andbalances founded on a separation of powers.
The Norwegian Constitution is based on a separation of powers, with an independent legislature, executive and judiciary.
Bahrain highlighted that the judiciary is independent and that there is a separation of powers.
There exists in most parliamentary democracies a separation of powers between the executive and legislative branches.
There was a plurality of political parties as well as free andtransparent elections and a separation of powers.
It is important that no power remains unchecked and that there is a separation of powers between the different functions of the State.
It calls for a separation of powers and functions between political and administrative leadership, as well as an obligation from the State for annual funding.
The Constitution of 1993 prescribes three branches of the State, legislative,executive and judicial, with a separation of powers and functions.
In the system of the State based on the rule of law with a separation of powers, jurisprudence is given a particularly strong position by the Basic Law.
Mozambique was a one-party State from independence in 1975 until 1990, when a new constitution was adopted,creating a multiparty system with a separation of powers.
Over 32 reports indicated that there is a separation of powers in Cuba, which ensures that the judiciary can perform its duties without interference from the other branches of Government.
RO Pacific highlighted that the Tonga Police Act had entered into force in 2010 andthat the fundamental change had been a separation of powers between the Police Commissioner and the Minister for Police.
While the Constitution provides for a separation of powers between the executive, legislative and judicial functions, there are a number of institutional constraints on their independent functioning and ability to protect human rights.
One can say that these values are not sufficiently rooted or that real political behaviour does not correspond with the patterns of participatory democracy,yet the idea of a separation of powers and civilian control over the authorities has nevertheless become quite widespread.
This approach ensures that there is a separation of powers in the oversight of intelligence services; the institutions that commission, undertake and receive the outputs of intelligence activities are not the only institutions that oversee these activities.
Decree No. 19 of 2000 giving effect to the new constitutional provision establishing the Higher Judicial Council, drawing a clear dividing line between the executive branch and the judiciary andthereby reinforcing a separation of powers stipulated in the Constitution;
The St Kitts and Nevis Constitution andlegislation made pursuant to it provide for a separation of powers between the(i) Legislature,(ii) the Executive(which includes the government) and(iii) the judiciary, thus creating strong foundation for an independent, impartial judiciary.
The Independence Constitution of Malta of 1964 establisheda liberal parliamentary democracy, safeguards specific fundamental human rights of citizens and provides for a separation of powers, with regular elections based on universal suffrage.
Such states do not have a separation of powers and instead have one national legislative body(such as the Supreme Soviet in the Soviet Union) which is considered the highest organ of state power and which is legally superior to the executive and judicial branches of government.
Understanding of, and respect for, the principle of the separation of powers is a sine qua non for a democratic State and is, therefore,of cardinal importance for countries in transition to democracy─ which heretofore have been typically characterized by precisely the absence of a separation of powers.
In 2005, CAT noted(i) the establishment of the Higher Judicial Council, drawing a clear dividing line between the executive branch and the judiciary andthereby reinforcing a separation of powers stipulated in the Constitution;(ii) the abolition of the State Security Court; and(iii) the repeal of the State Security Law.
Specifically, the institutions of Government should benefit from a separation of powers; unreasonable restrictions on the freedoms of opinion, expression and association should be removed, along with the legislated"leading role" of the Baath Party; and the repressive restrictions contained in the Political Parties Act should be abolished;
They challenged the idea of absolute monarchy and demanded a social contract as the new basis of political authority, anddemanded a more democratic organization of central power in a constitutional monarchy, with a separation of powers among the executive, legislative, and judicial branches of government Montesquieu, Diderot, and Rousseau.
The institutions of government should benefit from a separation of powers to render the executive accountable to the citizenry in a clear and meaningful way, and furthermore, steps should be taken to restore the independence of the judiciary and to subject the executive to the rule of law and render executive action justiciable;
Because of concerns about organized crime connections to gambling,New Jersey enacted strict regulations that included licensing of all casino employees and contractors, and a separation of powers between the Division of Gaming Enforcement(DGE) and the Casino Control Commission CCC.
This tradition arises out of the history of the French people and is inextricably bound up with the nation's commitment to democracy and the rule of law: article 16 of the Declaration of the Rights of Man and of Citizens of 26 August 1789 proclaims,moreover, that“Every community in which a separation of powers and a security of rights is not provided for, wants a Constitution”.
Mr. DESAI(India), replying to questions asked by members of the Committee under part I of the list of issues(CCPR/C/59/Q/IND/3),said that the 1958 Armed Forces(Special Powers) Act and the National Security(Amendment) Act were in no way contrary to the provisions of the Covenant and were implemented in accordance with the provisions of the Indian Constitution, which called for a separation of powers between the Federal Government and the seven States of the Union in legislative and executive matters.
There is a separation of power between the various government bodies, namely the President of the Republic, the National Assembly, the Government and the Courts.