Примеры использования Activities of armed forces на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Activities of armed forces during a non-international armed conflict.
In particular, it hoped that balance could be achieved in article 18 of the draft convention,which should not ignore the activities of armed forces.
The activities of armed forces, referred to in article 4 of the draft, should not be excluded.
Regarding draft Article 18 paragraph 2 one scholar noted that the activities of armed forces during an armed conflict were always governed by international humanitarian law.
The activities of armed forces during an armed conflict, as those terms are understood under international humanitarian law, which are governed by that law shall not be governed by this Protocol.”.
In the Terrorist Bombings Convention it had been recognized that the activities of armed forces during armed conflict were governed by international humanitarian law.
Excluding the activities of armed forces during an armed conflict from the scope of application of the comprehensive convention did not grant them impunity.
Draft article 18, paragraph 2,established a demarcation between what was covered by the draft convention and activities of armed forces during armed conflict, as those terms were understood under international humanitarian law.
Excluding the activities of armed forces during armed conflict did not in any way signify a carte blanche.
The Coordinator had further stressed that paragraph 2 of draft article 18 already established a demarcation between what was covered by the draft convention and activities of armed forces during armed conflict,"as those terms are understood under international humanitarian law.
In particular, activities of armed forces of a State during armed conflict, as those terms were understood under international humanitarian law, were governed by that law.
The Coordinator further underlined that it was common knowledge that an entirely different legal regime, already well established,addressed the activities of armed forces during armed conflict and that this was also the rationale behind paragraph 2 of draft article 18.
The activities of armed forces during an armed conflict, as those terms are understood under international humanitarian law, insofar as they conform to that law, are not governed by this Convention.”.
One of the scholars put forward that a major problem consisted in the fact that the activities of actors who did not fall under the definition of armed forces were not as comprehensively regulated by international humanitarian law as the activities of armed forces.
Furthermore, it was noted that unlike the activities of armed forces, those of internal security forces were not regulated by international law.
In the case of the International Convention for the Suppression of Terrorist Bombings, particular attention had been focused on excluding activities of peacekeepers, activities of armed forces and activities of military forces of a State from the scope of the Convention.
Exempting the activities of armed forces during an international armed conflict from the comprehensive convention certainly does not provide these forces with a carte blanche.
To achieve practical results, flexibility would be required andsolutions would need to be found to such problems as the definition of terrorism, the activities of armed forces, the distinction between terrorism and the struggle of peoples for self-determination and the concept of State terrorism.
The activities of armed forces during an armed conflict, as those terms are understood under international humanitarian law, which are governed by that law, are not governed by this Convention.
While article 19, paragraph 2, stated that the draft Convention did not apply to the activities of armed forces, that exemption applied to legitimate activities undertaken by States in accordance with international law and the Charter of the United Nations.
The activities of armed forces during an armed conflict, as those terms are understood under international humanitarian law, insofar as they conform to that law, are not governed by this Convention.”.
Under article 19, paragraph 2, of the International Convention for the Suppression of Terrorist Bombings,“the activities of armed forces during an armed conflict, as those terms are understood under international humanitarian law, which are governed by that law, are not governed by this Convention”.
The activities of armed forces during an armed conflict, as those terms are understood under international humanitarian law, which are governed by the law, are not governed by this Convention” A/52/653, p. 16.
For instance, with regard to article 3 of the draft, for which there was still no agreed text,her delegation believed that activities of armed forces conducted at times other than periods of armed conflict, and thus not governed by other norms such as those of international humanitarian law, should be covered by the Convention.
The activities of armed forces during an armed conflict, as those terms are understood under international humanitarian law, which are governed by that law are not governed by this Convention, and the activities undertaken by military forces of a State in the exercise of their official duties, inasmuch as they are governed by other rules of international law, are not governed by this Convention.
Cuba attached importance to the conclusion of a comprehensive convention on international terrorism that would containa clear definition of a terrorist act, encompass activities of armed forces not regulated by international humanitarian law and make a clear distinction between terrorism and peoples' struggles for independence and self-determination.
We believe that only those activities of armed forces undertaken pursuant to Chapters VII and VIII of the Charter of the United Nations can be immune from the scope of this Convention.
The Coordinator recalled the main concerns raised by delegations during the negotiations, namely:(a)the right of peoples to self-determination under international law;(b) the activities of armed forces in armed conflict; and(c) the activities of military forces of a State in peacetime, also taking into account related concerns about State terrorism.
In paragraph 2, the phrase"the activities of armed forces during an armed conflict" was used in the first of those versions while in the second the phrase read"the activities of the parties during an armed conflict, including in situations of foreign occupation.
The Secretary-General has further received a reservation from Belgium concerning article 4, paragraph 2, of the Firearms Protocol,stating that the activities of armed forces during a period of armed conflict, in the sense given those terms under international humanitarian law, which were governed by this law, were not governed by the Protocol.