Примеры использования Acts not prohibited на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Report on liability for acts not prohibited by international law.
Mr. Winkler(Austria) emphasized the relevance of the question of liability for injurious consequences arising out of acts not prohibited by international law.
Ii Liability for acts not prohibited by international law and protection of the environment;
Nothing in the draft articles would relate to the liability for acts not prohibited by international law.
Eleven articles on international liability for acts not prohibited by international law, published by the International Law Commission of the United Nations, 1985-1995.
Conceptually, the problem was related to the topic of international liability for injurious consequences arising out of acts not prohibited by international law.
Lastly, he believed that the use of the phrase"acts not prohibited by international law" in the title of chapter VIII of the report was unfortunate.
Ten years previously, the Commission, in its work on the topic of international liability, had focused on acts not prohibited by international law.
International liability for injurious consequences arising out of acts not prohibited by international law Prevention of transboundary damage from hazardous activities.
His delegation concurred with those that preferred a cautious approach to the question of the phrase"acts not prohibited by international law.
International liability for injurious consequences arising out of acts not prohibited by international law international liability in case of loss from transboundary harm arising out of hazardous.
A question was raised as to whether the Commission was envisaging the possibility of carrying out a study on the liability of international organizations for acts not prohibited under international law.
The issue of international liability for injurious consequences arising out of acts not prohibited by international law had been on the Commission's agenda for more than 25 years.
He wondered whether the Commission was envisaging the possibility of carrying out a study on the liability of international organizations for acts not prohibited under international law.
Third report on international liability for injurious consequences arising out of acts not prohibited by international law prevention of transboundary damage from hazardous activities.
Mr. Pham Truong Giang(Viet Nam)said that his delegation attached great importance to the question of international liability for injurious consequences arising out of acts not prohibited by international law.
Lastly, Denmark endorsed the ILC recommendation to exclude responsibility for acts not prohibited in international law from the draft rules under consideration.
His delegation noted with satisfaction the Commission's adoption of articles 1, 2 and11 to 20 relating to international liability for injurious consequences arising out of acts not prohibited by international law.
With respect to international liability for injurious consequences arising out of acts not prohibited by international law, he noted the progress achieved through the adoption of 18 draft articles.
There were, however, numerous interests at stake andthe financial implications of any statement of liability for injurious consequences arising out of acts not prohibited by international law were considerable.
With regard to international liability for injurious consequences arising out of acts not prohibited by international law, he commended the way in which the Special Rapporteur and the Commission had approached the topic.
Until 1992, the International Law Commission had been developing the concept of prevention as part of its work on international liability for injurious consequences arising out of acts not prohibited by international law.
Consequently, the draft articles on international liability for injurious consequences arising out of acts not prohibited by international law should be limited to particularly hazardous activities.
Mr. VARŠO(Slovakia) said that Slovakia shared the doubts of certain delegations regarding the draft articles on international liability for injurious consequences arising out of acts not prohibited by international law.
With regard to international liability for injurious consequences arising out of acts not prohibited by international law, it was necessary to bear in mind the linkage between that topic and the topic of State responsibility.
In addition, a Working Group had reviewed andpresented a complete set of articles together with commentaries on the topic of international liability for injurious consequences arising out of acts not prohibited by international law.
Regarding injurious consequences arising out of acts not prohibited by international law, his delegation urged the Working Group on the topic to persevere in its efforts to overcome the conceptual and theoretical difficulties involved.
According to the approach adopted by the Commission,there were two aspects to the analysis of liability for acts not prohibited by international law: prevention and reparation.
It should not deal with responsibility for acts not prohibited by international law, which should be handled separately and by analogy with State responsibility for those acts, once the Commission's work on that subject was complete.
The International Law Commission("ILC")has had occasion to review this practice in the course of its work on International Liability for injurious consequences arising out of acts not prohibited by international law.