Примеры использования Advisory committee had noted на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The Advisory Committee had noted inconsistencies in the model structure.
The continuing high vacancy rates for civilian staff in many peacekeeping operations were cause for concern, but the Advisory Committee had noted the steps taken to tackle that problem.
The Advisory Committee had noted the proposed large amount of documentation and the related cost.
In its previous report on the performance and proposed budget of UNDOF(A/65/743/Add.3), the Advisory Committee had noted that UNDOF had completed a review with the aim of streamlining support services.
As the Advisory Committee had noted in paragraph IV.7 of its report, the posts for 1998 had not been included in the staffing table.
Introducing the report of the Advisory Committee on construction of additional conference facilities at the Vienna International Centre(A/61/361),he said that the Advisory Committee had noted the cost-sharing arrangement between the four entities based at the Centre, and the establishment of their responsibility for maintenance and replacement costs.
In addition, the Advisory Committee had noted other deviations from the accepted budget methodology.
Mr. Abraszewski(Vice-Chairman of the Advisory Committee on Administrative andBudgetary Questions), introducing the report of the Advisory Committee on construction of additional office facilities at the Economic Commission for Africa(A/61/362), said that the Advisory Committee had noted the project's expected completion date of the end of 2009, and the assurance that no requests for additional funding would be made.
The Advisory Committee had noted in its report(A/53/692) that a substantial number of prior observations and recommendations had been addressed.
With reference to technical projects, the Advisory Committee had noted that UNCTAD was considering charging a small fee for technical services.
The Advisory Committee had noted that the proposed budget included a provision of $7.1 million for the implementation of various projects under the longer-term perspective.
With regard to section 6, Legal affairs, the Advisory Committee had noted that the International Law Commission was considering whether to split one of its sessions between New York and Geneva.
The Advisory Committee had noted that the number of non-governmental organizations in association with the United Nations intergovernmental machinery had increased sharply.
His delegation could not take a decision on the matter because, as the Advisory Committee had noted in its report, detailed analysis of the various advantages and disadvantages of the four optionshad not been provided by the Secretary-General.
The Advisory Committee had noted the high vacancy levels in 2011/12 for all categories of staff and urged the Secretary-General to fill the vacant posts as soon as possible.
In its related report the Advisory Committee had noted that little information was provided on the improvements envisaged A/AC.96/1068/Add.1, para.25.
The Advisory Committee had noted that the costs for software, customization and integration services would be known only after the business process re-engineering phase had been completed.
In considering the statement, the Advisory Committee had noted that the services would be provided by units which the Secretary-General proposed to transfer to the Department of Administration and Management.
The Advisory Committee had noted that the Board had continued to improve the quality of its reports but had not had time to review more extensively the implementation of the Board's recommendations.
In that regard the Advisory Committee had noted that $17 million had been proposed for that purpose in the report of the Secretary-General on the financing of UNTAC.
Nonetheless, the Advisory Committee had noted in paragraph 11 of its report(A/62/490) that there was a projected cost overrun of some $219.6 million.
At the time, the Advisory Committee had noted that it had been difficult to pinpoint with precision exactly how and where all the efficiency gains had arisen.
The Advisory Committee had noted that the United Nations Democracy Fund had become fully operational in 2006 and that it had been included in the Secretary-General's report for the first time.
The Advisory Committee had noted that 2 of the 11 buildings would be used by the World Food Programme and that the additional space would allow the off-site warehouse in San Pancrazio to be closed.
The Advisory Committee had noted in that regard that the phasing out of the current cost-sharing arrangements would increase the cost of security to the Member States by the substantial sum of $30 million.
Both the Board and the Advisory Committee had noted that the Board's findings and recommendations covered the period from April 2011 to April 2012, and that significant remedial measures had been taken since that time.
The Advisory Committee had noted with satisfaction that, in most cases, more realistic budgeting techniques had improved the implementation rate for the biennium 2002-2003 compared to previous bienniums.
As the Advisory Committee had noted in paragraph VI.4 of its report(A/50/7), the programme of work for 1994-1995 remained much the same as that for 1992-1993, despite the fact that the resource level had been increased by 20 per cent.
The Advisory Committee had noted a number of areas in which it was not clear on what basis the Secretary-General had arrived at the proposals regarding staffing and resource requirements contained in the report on the support account A/50/876.
The Advisory Committee had noted that there was no effective mechanism to monitor, evaluate and measure the results and impact of the programmes and activities of the United Nations, nor was there the necessary financial link to programmes and activities.