Примеры использования Allowed parties на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The unique structure of the Convention allowed Parties to respond to emerging threats in a flexible manner.
On that point, Ms. Nyst added that while there was some value in having specialized judges with technical knowledge,it was essential that courts allowed parties to be on an equal footing when challenging surveillance.
These meetings allowed Parties and other interested regional stakeholders to come together, inter alia.
Peaceful settlement of the complaint procedure allowed Parties to avoid the additional time and expense.
It was widely felt that the main disadvantage of the proposed new article lied in the fact that, unlike article 7 of the Model Law andcontrary to rules applicable in a paper-based environment, it allowed parties to derogate from mandatory rules of law.
The secretariat facilitated the initial process, which allowed Parties to participate and resulted in the preparation of drafts of the regional priorities for all Annexes.
Modifications to the Mediation Act ensured the effectiveness, impartiality andcompetence of the mediator and allowed parties to initiate further judicial proceedings or arbitration.
The new electoral alliances law allowed parties to form alliances and submit them to the YSK, meaning that they would be grouped together under their alliance name on the ballot paper.
The participation of the United Nations in the negotiating process was a positive step because it allowed parties to benefit from the Organization's broad experience in disarmament issues.
The 2002 version of the Guidelines allowed Parties to choose between reporting on fuel sold and fuel used for compliance purposes and encouraged reporting on fuel sold for modelling purposes.
One representative said that the Protocol's provisions were counter-productive insofar as they allowed Parties to offset new production of ozone-depleting substances by destroying existing stocks.
In addition, it was noted that, if the law allowed parties to determine the duration of registration(see recommendation 66), erroneous statements of the duration of registration would be corrected by the system, as, if the registrant paid for 5 years but stated 10 years on the notice, the notice would be cancelled after the expiry of 5 years, while, if the registrant paid for 10 years but wrote 5 years on the notice, the registrant could amend the notice at any time see recommendation 70.
It was stated that the first limb of the provision provided clarity in that it allowed parties to raise limitation amounts, a choice that could also be reflected in the amount of freight.
In his view,these panels would add value because they allowed parties, before a decision was made, to obtain an authoritative statement of the law on the legality of the decision.
It was pointed out that an absence of regulation had greatly facilitated the development of electronic data interchange and allowed parties to develop contractual means of addressing legal issues that arose.
The Chairman asked if there were comments on draft paragraph(5), which allowed parties to"opt in", voluntarily applying the Model Law to conciliation procedures even if the latter were not within the Law's remit or were not international.
It was said that since draft article 27, paragraph(4) provided the arbitral tribunal with the discretion to determine the relevance and weight of the evidence offered, anddraft article 29 allowed parties to submit their opinion on the expert's report, it might not be necessary to specifically address that matter in the draft provision.
Representatives recalled that the provision of decision XV/3 which allowed Parties to be excluded from the definition of"state not party to this Protocol", as long as appropriate information had been submitted by 31 March 2005, was due to expire at the Seventeenth Meeting of the Parties. .
Such an exclusion would address the concern of a number of States whose domestic legislation allowed parties to choose the application of foreign law, but not of international conventions as such.
The ICC was similar to processes under United States law that allowed parties to go to court to claim deprivation of land by the Government, where judgements or awards on such claims of"takings" were compensable only by money, not land.
Several representatives called for a provision similar to paragraph 4 of article 25 of the Stockholm Convention, which allowed parties to stipulate that amendments would enter into force for them only upon the deposit of an instrument of ratification, acceptance, approval or accession.
In the light of the fact that draft article 1, paragraph(1), already allowed parties to enact the Model Law to apply to domestic as well as international conciliation, he asked if it was advisable to retain draft article 1, paragraph(5), as it would have no relevance whatsoever for those parties. .
However, the dualist approach was mitigated by the doctrine of legitimate expectations,which seemed to have been adopted by the judiciary in Vanuatu and which allowed parties to invoke provisions of the Convention before a court of law on the basis of their legitimate expectations that the country was complying with its obligations under the Convention.
She commented that accounting frameworks andstockpile information allowed parties to track the management and deployment of CFC stockpiles, which was particularly important in avoiding new CFC production.
The first period of work(identification of, and information-sharing on,framing issues) allowed Parties to discuss, in the context of three in-session workshops, a range of cross-cutting issues, taking into account different national circumstances.
The proposed reporting template reflected the"spirit" of the Protocol, as it allowed Parties to provide, in a descriptive way, information on targets set in accordance with article 6 of the Protocol and progress made towards achieving them.
This broad-based control structure allows Parties to take differing approaches to the phase-out.
Article 14 allows parties to modify the representations, whether explicitly or implicitly.
Paragraph 6 allows parties to exclude the application of the Model Law.
Engaging in in-depth discussion allows parties to take stock of the situation and the possibilities for resolution.