Примеры использования Application for leave на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
It is necessary to advance the application for leave them website.
His application for leave to appeal was denied on 28 June 1994.
Pursuant to rule 65(D),the accused filed an application for leave to appeal.
Vujin filed an application for leave to appeal on 7 February 2000.
The law has not changed in respect of the time limit for lodging the application for leave.
Люди также переводят
In brief, the application for leave to appeal must set out the grounds.
The Court first granted the request butsubsequently dismissed the application for leave to appeal.
An application for leave to appeal suspends the enforcement of the decision.
On 9 April 1998, Ms. Laing lodged an application for leave to appeal to the High Court of Australia.
He reminded the Court that he submitted this claim within his application for leave to appeal.
The author's application for leave for appeal was rejected by the Federal Court.
The point could, and should,also have been raised in the application for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeal.
The author's application for leave to appeal was dismissed by the Court of Appeal on 29 November 1985.
Moreover, at the hearing before the Court of Appeal,the lawyer remarked that he could not support his client's application for leave to appeal.
The Federal Court rejected the author's application for leave for judicial review on 24 March 2005.
One application for leave to appeal was brought before a bench of three judges of the Appeals Chamber under rule 65 provisional release.
In the specific circumstances of the case, the Committee, therefore, considered that an application for leave to appeal to the Federal Court did not constitute an effective remedy.
One application for leave was withdrawn by the appellant and one is currently pending before a bench of three judges.
In the specific circumstances of the case, the Committee, therefore,considers that an application for leave to appeal to the Federal Court did not constitute an effective remedy.
An application for leave to appeal was filed with the Court of Appeal on the grounds of unfair trial and insufficient evidence to warrant a conviction.
The author also disputes the State party's observation that,in certain cases, the court hearing an application for leave to appeal takes"a more proactive investigative stance.
There is no further appeal or application for leave to appeal from the Federal Court of Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada, or to any other domestic tribunal.
The author further alleges that they were not professionally represented by the legal aid lawyers during the IRB hearing and during the application for leave to apply for judicial review, as these lawyers were incompetent and distorted material facts.
Thus, his application for leave to apply for judicial review was never properly submitted to the Federal Court and was dismissed due to lack of diligence in completing the application process.
They also suggested that there be an amendment to the statute of the Appeals Tribunal to require a party wishing to appeal an interim order to obtain leave to appeal from a single duty judge of the Appeals Tribunal, and they recommended that there be a provision that allows a party appealing an interlocutory orinterim order to request a stay of execution from the Appeals Tribunal judge who hears the application for leave to appeal.
Instead, his counsel, seemingly newly hired by the author,filed an application for leave to review the Departure Order issued on 25 October 2004, which was dismissed due to his failure to file an Application Record.
The author's application for pre-removal risk assessment was denied on 9 May 2008 on the grounds that he was not personally targeted or particularly at risk of kidnapping and that the risk in question was a general one which affects the entire Haitian population. On 2 June 2008, the Federal Court rejected the application to stay his deportation.On 24 July 2008, the Federal Court rejected his application for leave and for judicial review of the rejection of his application for a pre-removal risk assessment.
Thus,"many notices of application for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada" have been dismissed, and an application for leave to appeal to the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council[sic] has been"illegally ignored.
The authors add to the facts as submitted and state that in June 2009, the State party's authorities released them from detention and in July 2009 served them with a PRRA with a stay.On 7 October 2009, their PRRA application was rejected and their application for leave and judicial review before the Federal Court remains pending. On 24 February 2010, the Federal Court heard the authors on the mootness of their application to re-instate the first PRRA.
In the complainant's view,both remedies would have been ineffective, as an application for leave to appeal is only a"theoretical possibility" and, in an application for compensation, she could not have invoked her rights under the Convention.