Примеры использования Are sufficiently substantiated на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Therefore, contrary to the State party's assertion, the author's claims are sufficiently substantiated.
The Committee considers that these allegations are sufficiently substantiated for purposes of admissibility, and declares them admissible.
The Committee also finds that the complaints under article 14,paragraph 3(a) and(c), are sufficiently substantiated.
The Committee considers that such claims are sufficiently substantiated for purposes of admissibility and that they should be considered on their merits.
In the absence of a response from the State party,the Committee must give due weight to the complainant's claims that are sufficiently substantiated.
The Committee considers that the author's remaining claims are sufficiently substantiated, for purposes of admissibility.
Given that these claims remained unaddressed by the State party in its observations,the Committee considers that due weight must be given to the author's allegations as far as they are sufficiently substantiated.
The author therefore maintains that her claims are sufficiently substantiated and corroborated by the documentary evidence provided to the Committee.
As to the remaining claims of violations of the provisions of article 14; article 9, paragraph 1; article 19; and article 25(b),the Committee considers these claims are sufficiently substantiated and finds no other bar to their admissibility.
The Committee considers that the authors' claims are sufficiently substantiated for purposes of admissibility, and therefore proceeds to consider them on the merits, in accordance with article 5, paragraph 2, of the Optional Protocol.
The Committee considers that the remaining part of the author's allegations under article 2; article 6; article 7; article 10; andarticle 14 are sufficiently substantiated, for purposes of admissibility, and declares them admissible.
The Committee considers that the author's claims under articles 12, 17,23 and 24 are sufficiently substantiated for purposes of admissibility, and therefore proceeds to consider them on the merits, in accordance with article 5, paragraph 2, of the Optional Protocol.
As to the remaining claims of violations of articles 9, paragraph 1, and 14, paragraphs 1, 2, 3(a),(b),(d),(e), and 5, and article 19,the Committee considers these claims are sufficiently substantiated and finds no other bar to their admissibility.
In the absence of any apparent obstacle to admissibility the Committee concludes that the claims are sufficiently substantiated and the communication is admissible insofar as it raises issues with respect to articles 7; 9, paragraphs 1 to 4; 10, paragraphs 1 and 2(a); and 17, paragraph 1, of the Covenant.
The Committee, noting that the State party has not challenged the admissibility of any of the author's claims on any other ground than its reservation,considers that the author's claims are sufficiently substantiated to be considered on the merits.
The Committee considers the author's remaining claims under article 7 are sufficiently substantiated, for purposes of admissibility, and proceeds to their examination on the merits.
As to the objections to the remaining claims based on insufficient substantiation,the Committee considers that in the light of its jurisprudence on issues in respect of family relations the claims are sufficiently substantiated for an examination of the merits.
The Committee considers that the authors' remaining claims under article 17 of the Covenant are sufficiently substantiated, for purposes of admissibility, and proceeds to their examination on the merits.
The Committee considers that the remaining claims of the present communication, raising issues under article 9, and article 14, paragraph 1, read together with article 6, of the Covenant, in relation to the alleged victim, andarticle 7, of the Covenant, with respect to the authors, are sufficiently substantiated, for purposes of admissibility.
The Committee considers that the authors' claimsunder articles 19 and 21 of the Covenant are sufficiently substantiated for purposes of admissibility, declares them admissible and proceeds to their examination on the merits.
As the State party has not contested the admissibility of any of the other claims advanced by the author, the Committee, on the basis of the information available to it, concludes that the claims based on articles 7 and 9; and article 2,paragraph 3, are sufficiently substantiated, for purposes of admissibility, and are thus admissible.
The Committee considers that the author's claims under article 19 andarticle 21 of the Covenant are sufficiently substantiated, for purposes of admissibility, declares them admissible and proceeds to their examination on the merits.
The Committee considers, therefore, that the author's claims under article 1; article 2, paragraphs(a) and(c); article 5, paragraph(a); and article 11,paragraphs 1(a) and(d), of the Convention are sufficiently substantiated for purposes of admissibility, and thus declares the communication admissible.
As to articles 7, 9 and 10,the author claims that the claims are sufficiently substantiated, contending that the State party created a"special atmosphere" around the author and engaged in"unacceptable" discussion in the media prior to judgement, and that she was required to wear an orange prison robe that showed she was a"high class criminal.
On the merits, the authors argue that their statements on the adverse effects of their removal to Fiji are sufficiently substantiated, and refer to the domestic proceedings at which these issues were raised.
The Committee considers the author's remaining claims under article 6, paragraphs 1 and 2; article 7; article 9, paragraphs 1 and 2; and article 14, paragraphs 3(d), 3(e)and 3(g), are sufficiently substantiated, for purposes of admissibility, and proceeds to their examination on the merits.
In the absence of any observations by the State party,the Committee considers that these allegations are sufficiently substantiated, for purposes of admissibility, and therefore the communicationis admissible under article 7 and 14, paragraph 3(g), of the Covenant.
The Committee considers that the author's allegations relating to articles 2(a),(b),(d),(e) and(f), 3 and 5(a),read in conjunction with article 1 of the Convention, are sufficiently substantiated for purposes of admissibility, and thus declares the communication admissible.
The Committee considers that the author's claimsunder article 19 and article 21 of the Covenant are sufficiently substantiated for the purposes of admissibility, declares them admissible and proceeds to their examination on the merits.
The Committee considers that the author's remaining claims under article 2; article 7; article 9, paragraph 1; article 10; article 14, paragraphs 1, 2, 3(b),(d),(e) and(g); and article 15,paragraph 1, of the Covenant, are sufficiently substantiated, for purposes of admissibility, and proceeds to their examination on the merits.