Примеры использования Author has not provided на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The author has not provided any answers to these questions.
Further, with regard to the alleged violations of article 16 and article 18,paragraph 2, of the Covenant, the Committee notes that the author has not provided detailed information concerning these alleged violations.
However, the author has not provided the Committee with details on the object of his ECHR complaint.
The Committee notes the author's argument regarding the delay in submission and considers that,in the present case, the author has not provided any reasonable justification for the delay in submitting her communication to the Committee.
It considers that the author has not provided sufficient information to substantiate these additional claims.
As to the author's allegation of a lack of independence or impartiality of the Saskatchewan Human Rights Tribunal"judge" in the Carlson test case,the State party submits that the author has not provided any evidence to support his allegation.
The Committee notes that the author has not provided any information contesting this argument.
The author has not provided any proof relating to the alleged denial, by the Victorian authorities, to allow him access to lawyers.
With regard to the author's claims under articles 2, 7 and 9 of the Covenant,the Committee considers that the author has not provided information sufficient to substantiate his allegations and accordingly declares them inadmissible under article 2 of the Optional Protocol.
The author has not provided any indication that he is wanted or might be wanted on any criminal charges in the Republic of Moldova.
It also submits,in relation to the author's allegations that the NSWFB failed to investigate his complaints according to the official grievance policy, that the author has not provided any evidence that the investigation of his grievance by his superiors at the NSWFB was an ineffective way to provide him with protection and remedies.
In any event, the author has not provided evidence sufficient to enable a proper consideration of this claim.
However, it notes that the author has not provided any evidence of a violation of that article.
The author has not provided the Committee with any new evidence regarding the risk of irreparable harm he would allegedly face due to Falun Gong adherence.
It further notes that the author has not provided an authorization from her daughter to act on her behalf.
The author has not provided information as to what contact, if any, she had with the trustee appointed to administer Constable J. 's estate in order to ensure that her interests were taken into account in the administration process.
In her initial submission, the author has not provided a power of attorney to act on Mr. Karimov's behalf.
Similarly, the author has not provided sufficient information as to the alleged violation of his rights as a former penitentiary official by being held at times together with ordinary criminals.
The Committee considers, therefore, that the author has not provided sufficient information to substantiate this claim for the purposes of admissibility.
However, the author has not provided any details of the ill-treatment received after his arrest, nor have the medical examinations carried out by the hospital given rise to any record of such ill-treatment.
The State party also notes that the author has not provided information about the extent or nature of the alleged mistakes in translation.
Since the author has not provided information on undue delays during the criminal proceedings, the State party holds that the author has not substantiated his complaint and that, consequently, this part of the communication should be declared inadmissible under article 2 of the Optional Protocol.
Finally the State party reiterates that the author has not provided any information on applicants who were accepted without undergoing the personality tests.
In the case at hand, the author has not provided the Committee with sufficient information to enable it to conclude that the domestic remedies are ineffective.
In addition, the Committee considers that the author has not provided sufficient information in support of her contention regarding the alleged religious-based persecution.
It considers, however, that the author has not provided sufficient information to substantiate his claim, including information on whether his claim was brought before the judicial authorities.
The judge of the Leninsky District Court of Brest also concluded that the author has not provided the court with evidence, proving that in the course of her detention she had requested officers in charge of preliminary investigation to bring her before a judge.
It further notes that the author has not provided the Committee with any arguments, including medical evidence, which could have explained such inconsistencies.
As for article 26, the author has not provided any information on alleged discrimination by the State party.
The Committee notes that the author has not provided any explanation regarding her motives for her voluntary departure to Mexico.