Примеры использования Author refers на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The author refers to this attack as"Block Skipping Attack.
As the State party raises the same issues, the author refers the Committee to his prior comments of 14 December 2006.
The author refers to the following incidents in support of his claim.
As regards his claims under articles 16 and 26 of the Covenant, the author refers to his original communication and reiterates his arguments.
The author refers to literary and artistic works of Khashagulgov.
Люди также переводят
To separate the original meaning of the concept of the"Third Rome" from its cultural processing,the ideal from its implementation, the author refers to the non-classical variant of phenomenology developed by M.
As an example, the author refers to the proceedings filed by her daughters late in 1993.
In this context, the Committee observes that legal norms dealing with bias,for example section 52 of the Municipalities Act to which the author refers, are not apt to cover the problem of balancing interests on a general basis.
The author refers to his previous correspondence, and challenges the State party's arguments.
Finally, with respect to the insufficiency of the evidence against him, the author refers to a report prepared at his request by two specialists in criminal procedure at the University of Granada.
The author refers to several provisions of the Convention, without describing in detail how they may be considered relevant.
Comparing the images of the past with the photographs taken at the same places today, the author refers to the memories about the town of his childhood- a former military base from which almost nothing has left today.
The author refers to systematic human rights violations in Tunisia, including the routine practice of torture.
The State party further notes that the reports by human rights bodies about generalized violence in Mexico, to which the author refers in her communication, were presented to and duly evaluated by the pre-removal risk assessment officer.
Finally, the author refers to a malpractice suit which he filed against his lawyer.
As to the allegation of discrimination by subgroup, the State party, referring to the travaux préparatoires for the Act of 22 December 1998,points out that the legislature did indeed take account of the observations of the Council of State to which the author refers.
In this context, the author refers to the ECHR judgement in the Saunder case 17 December 1996.
The author refers, generally, to various attempts by victims, relatives of victims and non-governmental organizations, who sought to file complaints for past and ongoing human rights violations by security forces, which were rejected by the police.
The dual nature which the author refers to, is a reunion of both his physical and moral states.
The author refers in this connection to the Committee's position established in its jurisprudence on enforced disappearances.
In comments dated 3 December 2009, the author refers to the State party's description of him as being a fugitive from justice.
The author refers to his original communication and reiterates that the distinction made in the present case is discriminatory.
As to the exhaustion of domestic remedies, the author refers to his father's numerous attempts to ascertain the fate or whereabouts of Mohamed Hassan Aboussedra.
The author refers to his being uprooted from his home, family and employment and denied the possibility to return to Australia once deported.
In this connection, the author refers to the position adopted by the Committee in its jurisprudence on enforced disappearances.
The author refers to the incident that occurred on 30 September 2004, when Mr. Sh., while drunk,"physically pressured" him.
In this context, the author refers to the overcrowding of prisons and the imposition of the death penalty as a form of punishment.
The author refers to jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights for the proposition that a law cannot be retroactively applied to an accused's detriment.
In this regard, the author refers to the concluding observations of the Human Rights Committee and to the report of the Special Rapporteur on torture.
The author refers to a ruling of the Supreme Court of Uzbekistan of 1996, according to which evidence obtained through unlawful methods is inadmissible.