Примеры использования Author was refused на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The author was refused visiting rights.
Progressive for his time, Tsiolkovsky was not supported on the airship project, and the author was refused a grant to build the model.
On this basis, and considering that the author was refused leave to appeal to the Supreme Court, the Committee finds that the author has exhausted domestic remedies.
After the beatings, which allegedly included being hit with batons, an iron pipe anda metal detector, the author was refused the medical treatment he had requested.
The author was refused citizenship on national security grounds on account of his previous service as a professional member of the armed forces of the former USSR, pursuant to paragraph 21(1) clause 6 of the Citizenship Act.
During investigation, the author was refused a lawyer of his choice.
In January 1990, the Court provisionally provided limited access in the presence of a third person, an arrangement which was apparently not kept.On 17 January 1990, the author was refused a residence permit.
The Committee observes that,according to the information available on file, the author was refused accreditation as she was not granted security clearance giving her access to the premises of the National Assembly.
In April 1995, the author was refused further legal aid. On 17 July 1995, the Queensland Prisoners Legal Service refused the author's request for assistance. On 28 August 1995, the ACT Legal Aid Office refused the author's application for legal aid.
It further notes that the author's claims under article 21 of the Covenant are unfounded as the author was refused permission to hold the picket in order to ensure public order.
In case No. 1903/2009(Youbko v. Belarus), the author was refused permission by local authorities to display posters calling for justice during a picket that was aimed at drawing public attention to the need for the judiciary to respect both the Constitution and international treaties when adjudicating civil and criminal cases.
Since the author's verification procedure was terminated on 21 September 1990 with the decision by the Central Qualifying Committee that he was eligible for employment in the Ministry, and the author was refused employment on 24 October 1990, the State party argues that his communication is inadmissible ratione temporis.
The Committee recalls that, in the present case, the registration of the author was refused by the District Electoral Commission on the ground that he provided personal data that"did not correspond to reality" but without indicating what specific data was impugned by this finding.
In that respect, the Committee notes the author's allegations, uncontested by the State party, that neither the author northe other civilian witnesses were called to give evidence; that the author was refused access to the file; that there was no public hearing; and that once the finding was made in the civil proceeding, there was no opportunity to reopen or recommence disciplinary proceedings.
In that respect, the Committee noted that neither the author northe other civilian witnesses were called to give evidence; that the author was refused access to the file; that there was no public hearing; and that once the finding was made in the civil proceeding, there was no opportunity to reopen or recommence the disciplinary proceedings.
Mr. Ospina Sardi also requested that the author be refused permission to see the children in Colombia, and that the children should not be allowed to visit their mother in Italy.
With regard to the author's claim that article 12, section 5 of the Aliens Act, does not apply to citizens of the European Union and NATO,the State party recalls that the author's request was refused in 1998, but that the provision the author invokes entered into force only on 1 October 1999.
The author claims that this hearing was refused three times.
The author submits that he was refused, on nine different occasions, permission to picket by the executive authorities of the town of Vitebsk, Belarus.
The author further alleges that he was refused medical assistance for his high blood pressure, heart problems and medical care for cancer analysis.
In France, after his request for asylum was rejected, the author requested a residence permit, which was refused him by the prefect of the Val d'Oise on 12 August 1993.
The author petitioned the Supreme Administrative Court(Stockholm) for leave to appeal the decision of the Administrative Court of Appeal. The author's petition was refused on 5 August 2010.
The author requested an interpreter but was refused on the basis that"facts were not to be proven" in this instance and therefore the request for an interpreter was unnecessary.
The author was received and accommodated at an open facility. On 12 December 1995, the author's application was refused. On 29 January 1996, he appealed this decision. On 12 June 1996, his appeal was dismissed.
It submits that the author's claim that he was refused the possibility of calling witnesses who could corroborate his alibi is not justified.
The author claims that the reason he was refused legal aid was on the basis of the costs of such an appeal.
Towards the end of the 1960s, the author's application for Canadian citizenship was refused by the Minister for Immigration, without any reason being given to him.
With regard to the latter, the Committee takes note of the State party's argument that while the author's request was refused in 1998, article 12, section 7, invoked by the author, only entered into force on 1 October 1999.
Since the author's request for asylum was refused on the basis that the situation in Zaire had improved, she argues that a"new application" on the basis of the new medical evidence would be rejected on the same grounds.
The Court considered that in simply citing a general provision of law rather than justifying the individual basis on which the author's application was refused, the Government had insufficiently reasoned the decision and left it impossible to ascertain whether the author's equality rights had been violated.