Примеры использования Authors are entitled на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
It does not accept that the authors are entitled to compensation.
Authors are entitled to use materials published in KSIA and bring them out in other publications subsequently.
It does not accept that the authors are entitled to compensation.
Thus, the State party does not accept the Committee's view that Australia breached article 9,paragraph 4 of the Covenant, neither is it of the view that the authors are entitled to an effective remedy.
Pursuant to article 2, paragraph 3(a),of the Covenant, the authors are entitled to an effective remedy, entailing compensation.
Under the terms of the journals Open Access license, authors are entitled to deposit the final published version of their article in institutional and/or centrally organized repositories immediately upon publication, provided that the journal and Publishing House are attributed as the original place of publication and that correct citation details are given.
The State party does not accept that the authors are entitled to compensation.
Pursuant to article 2, paragraph 3(a), of the Covenant, the authors are entitled to an appropriate remedy, which should include compensation determined on the basis of a sum equivalent to the salary which they would have received during the period of non-reinstatement starting from 30 June 1988.
Under article 2, paragraph 3, of the Covenant, the authors are entitled to an effective remedy.
The Committee is of the view that the authors are entitled, under article 2, paragraph 3(a), of the Covenant, to an effective remedy. The State party is under an obligation to ensure an adequate remedy to the authors including, compensation and a prompt resolution of their case on the enforcement of the United States judgement in the State party.
Pursuant to article 2,paragraph 3(a), of the Covenant, the Committee considers that the authors are entitled to an effective remedy.
The Human Rights Committee is of the view that the authors are entitled, under article 2, paragraph 3(a), of the Covenant, to an appropriate remedy.
Pursuant to article 2,subparagraph 3(a), of the Covenant, the authors are entitled to an effective remedy, entailing compensation.
Therefore, the decision to adjust the benefits to which the authors are entitled by the Regulation by applying the criteria of the General Social Security Law violates the principle of equality, as two entirely different factual patterns are treated equally.
Pursuant to article 2, paragraph 3(a) of the Covenant, the Committee concludes that the authors are entitled to an effective remedy of compensation for both authors. .
Pursuant to article 2, paragraph 3(a), of the Covenant,the Committee considers that the authors are entitled to an appropriate remedy, including compensation and reconsideration of the authors' application for registration of their association in the light of article 22.
The Committee recalls its jurisprudence,as well as rule 96(b) of its rules of procedure, in support of the finding that the authors are entitled to submit a communication alleging that the rights of a deceased relative were violated.
Pursuant to article 2, paragraph 3(a),of the Covenant, the Committee considers that the authors are entitled to an appropriate remedy, including the reconsideration of the application for registration of Civil Alternative, based on criteria compliant with the requirements of article 22 of the Covenant, and adequate compensation.
Having regard to its position, the State party is not of the view that the authors are entitled to an effective remedy of compensation or that Mrs. Bakhtiyari is entitled to release.
Pursuant to article 2, paragraph 3(a),of the Covenant, the Committee considers that the authors are entitled to an appropriate remedy, including a reconsideration of the authors' application in accordance with the principles, rules and practice in force at the time of the authors' request, and duly taking into account of the provisions of the Covenant.
Promoting progress in the arts does not inherently justify the idea that authors are entitled to any particular sort of copyright, or even that copyright should exist at all.
The Committee considered that the author was entitled to an appropriate remedy including compensation.
It decided that the author was entitled to an effective remedy, including compensation.
Pursuant to article 2,subparagraph 3(a), of the Covenant, the author is entitled to an effective remedy, entailing compensation for the ill-treatment suffered.
It decided that the authors were entitled to an effective remedy and that the respective convictions had to be reviewed in accordance with that provision.
The Committee considers that the author is entitled, in accordance with article 2, paragraph 3(a), of the Covenant, to an effective remedy.
It decided that the authors were entitled to an appropriate remedy, including reconsideration of their application, duly taking into account the provisions of the Covenant.
In the event of copyright violation, an author is entitled by law to initiate legal proceedings against the third party, and this may eventually result in compensation.
Pursuant to article 2, paragraph 3(a), of the Covenant,the Committee considers that the author is entitled to an effective remedy, including appropriate compensation for the violations suffered.
When the US Constitution was drafted,the idea that authors were entitled to a copyright monopoly was proposed- and rejected.