Примеры использования Break-out groups на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Break-out groups.
IV. Outcomes of the break-out groups.
Break-out groups: Mitigation of impacts: practical solutions Moderators TBC.
At these meetings, small break-out groups will.
Discussions took place in break-out groups to foster the sharing of knowledge and find common solutions and plans of action.
The following summarizes the main outcomes of the break-out groups.
Several mentioned in break-out groups that UNEP could play that role.
The session on day 1 ended with a discussion in break-out groups.
The discussions were held in three break-out groups which reported their outcomes to the workshop's final plenary session.
Below are some general principles that came out of the meetings of the break-out groups.
The break-out groups highlighted a number of possible areas for follow-up action with regard to vulnerability and adaptation assessments.
After the presentations participants held discussions in three break-out groups on the following questions.
The break-out groups drew on the draft text prepared in advance as well as on other relevant information, also initiating some alternative analysis.
The presentations were also meant to prepare participants for discussions to be held in the break-out groups, which dealt with the following topics.
Based on the discussions in the break-out groups, participants identified options for the above topics which are contained in the annex to this report.
The programme included an opening ceremony, four sessions,which included both presentations in plenary meeting and discussions in break-out groups, and a closing ceremony.
Subsequently, the Group was divided into three small break-out groups each assigned to discuss a certain topic on risk reduction.
The purpose of that session was to enable participants to better understand the situation in the Caribbean andto lay the ground for discussions in break-out groups.
For the second session, on committees and working groups, the participants were divided into three smaller break-out groups to permit more intensive discussion and sharing of experiences.
The following summary highlights the most relevant points arising from the presentations and discussions in the seminar,also summarizing the main outcomes of three break-out groups.
The session included guided practical work: participants worked in randomly assigned break-out groups on defining an implementing strategy for a given NAPA case study.
Ambassador Vassilakis moderated one of the break-out groups and Ambassador Gheorghe Dumitru, the Deputy Permanent Representative of Romania, and Ambassador Ellen Margrethe Løj, the Permanent Representative of Denmark, the other two.
After the introduction of each theme, the participants in the initiative had more in-depth discussions on important issues in three parallel break-out groups, which reported back to the plenary.
Subsequently, the Group was divided into three small break-out groups each assigned to discuss a certain topic on the theme of possible information exchange database, portal or platform, as follows.
Based on a draft Track B review prepared by an ad hoc drafting group in advance of the Task Force meeting, the Task Force,in small break-out groups, considered questions of relevance for Track B for each product group.
The above objectives were also discussed in break-out groups under the following three main topics: capacity-building and knowledge management and transfer; the knowledge portal; and support to national disaster management planning and policies.
The Executive Director introduced a background paper on emerging policy issues(UNEP/GC.21/5) to stimulate the dialogue and proposed a procedure for the ministers to follow in order to structure the consultation and have a free andopen discussion, within two break-out groups, one of which would discuss poverty and the environment and the other health and the environment.
Taking into account the following aspects when organizing the break-out groups, with a view to maximizing the instructive nature of and engagement in the break-out group sessions of the various exercises.
Discussions within the three break-out groups aimed at identifying which steps would have to be taken in order to ensure the integration and maximum use of such information so as to make communities within the Caribbean safer from disasters and better prepared at all phases of the disaster management cycle.
Following discussions based on submissions from Parties and IGOs, presentations and background papers,participants discussed various options in detail in four break-out groups focusing on criteria for institutional arrangements to manage the Adaptation Fund, share of proceeds and other funding, eligibility and disbursement requirements, and priority areas.