Примеры использования Claimant asserts that it на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The Claimant asserts that it did not charge the Allied Coalition Forces for the use of the port.
While stating that the contract, which was signed in 1988,had not come into operation as of 2 August 1990, the claimant asserts that it was due to come into operation shortly after 2 August 1990, and that it would have been profitable.
The Claimant asserts that it therefore mobilized all its capabilities"in all land and sea border sites of the Kingdom.
In response to the possibility that the desalination plants might be cut off from other sources of power, the Claimant asserts that it purchased 15 generators at a total cost of SAR 2,003,690 for the Al Khobar and Jubail plants during the period September 1990 to January 1991.
The Claimant asserts that it received no reimbursement of the claimed costs from the housemaids, their employers or their respective Governments.
In addition to evacuating its citizens from Kuwait and Iraq, the Claimant asserts that it was required to evacuate its diplomats from Kuwait City and Baghdad as well as from other Middle Eastern cities, including Ankara, Riyadh, Teheran, Tel Aviv and Damascus.
The claimant asserts that it is entitled to compensation because the losses occurred during Iraq's invasion and occupation of Kuwait.
The Panel finds that if a claimant was trading during Iraq's invasion andoccupation of Kuwait, and the claimant asserts that it received the cancelled Kuwaiti dinar currency notes in the usual course of its business during that period, these facts will be sufficient to establish the circumstances under which the cancelled Kuwaiti dinars came into the claimant's possession.
The Claimant asserts that it suspended the vacation of staff members and required them to work 24 hours a day at their posts from 3 August 1990 to 3 March 1991.
Consequently, the Claimant asserts that it incurred the following additional costs during the period of Iraq's invasion and occupation of Kuwait.
In addition, the Claimant asserts that it purchased safety equipment for bomb shelters intended to protect its employees and passengers in the port of Dammam.
The Claimant asserts that it was responsible for maintaining security along an 800 kilometre length of border with Iraq, and that several villages were located in this area.
The Claimant asserts that it was necessary to prepare and maintain the accommodation in Jubail for the evacuated personnel, and that certain costs were incurred in doing so.
The Claimant asserts that it incurred incremental staff costs because the influx of large numbers of Kuwaiti refugees resulted in an increased burden on the entry and exit centres as follows.
The Claimant asserts that it incurred certain costs in providing services to the military ships and further, that the following fees would have been received for an equivalent commercial tonnage.
The Claimant asserts that it provided assistance to Kuwaiti refugees, in the form of food and medical care, accommodation and utilities(electricity, water, communications and waste collection) in Jubail.
The Claimant asserts that it incurred costs for the following repairs to the port's administrative building for damage that occurred during the invasion of Al Khafji by Iraqi forces on 29- 31 January 1991.
The Claimant asserts that it was required to purchase additional standard police uniforms for 10,000 volunteers who assisted the police and officers who were required to work 24-hour shifts.
The Claimant asserts that it provided 3,615 apartments and houses in two major cities, Riyadh and Khobar, to members of the Allied Coalition Forces during the period of Iraq's invasion and occupation of Kuwait.
The Claimant asserts that it was also necessary to purchase advanced military technology in order to provide a viable deterrent to the Iraqi army, which allegedly outnumbered the Saudi Arabian forces.
Thus, the claimant asserts that it suffered losses because it can no longer use the moulds or dispose of them as scrap as this would be a violation of the agreements with the customers for whom the moulds were created.
The Claimant asserts that it authorised 24-hour television broadcasts during this period in order to provide the people of Saudi Arabia with information bulletins regarding the conflict and civil defence instructions, if necessary.
The Claimant asserts that it agreed in late 1989 to pay a Kuwaiti engineering company a monthly consulting fee of KWD 5,250 to supervise the construction of the new headquarters building from March 1990.
One claimant asserts that it incurred increased costs in order to continue performing contracts to maintain telecommunications networks in Saudi Arabia during Iraq's invasion and occupation of Kuwait, and suffered losses as a result.
The Claimant asserts that it was required to make the reimbursements pursuant to the Netherlands Foreign Service Regulations which govern the employment relationship between the Claimant and its diplomatic personnel.
The Claimant asserts that it advanced the sum of LKR 3,500,000 to the Sri Lankan Ministry of Foreign Affairs in September 1990 to pay for the evacuation and repatriation of Sri Lankan nationals who fled into Jordan from Kuwait after 2 August 1990.
The Claimant asserts that it was unable to use its main office premises during this period because of Iraq's invasion and occupation of Kuwait and that, as a result, it incurred rent costs for which it received no benefit.
The Claimant asserts that it did not renegotiate the terms and prices of the contracts after the liberation of Kuwait because, in accordance with Saudi business practice, it was not permitted to attempt to renegotiate the tenders, other than to accept the lowest bid.
The Claimant asserts that it disbursed the amount of TND 64,903 to Tunisian Embassies and General Consulates in Iraq, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Egypt and Libya to finance assistance and relief provided to Tunisian nationals fleeing from Iraq and Kuwait during the invasion and occupation period.
The Claimant asserts that it paid for the accommodation of United Nations representatives at a hotel in Ar'ar during the period 2 August 1990 to 2 March 1991 and hosted United Nations' representatives and the Ambassador of Kuwait to Saudi Arabia who were present in the area"to supervise the exchange of Kuwaiti prisoners and the handover of some stolen gold at the border centre of Judaida Ar'ar.