Примеры использования Complainant considers на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The complainant considers that she has exhausted domestic legal remedies.
Contrary to the State party, the complainant considers that medical reports do constitute evidence in support of his claim.
The complainant considers that the State party's attitude is contradictory.
Regarding the alleged contradictions andinconsistencies of his account of the facts, the complainant considers that the State party misinterpreted his words, particularly on the question of his detention on account of his brother's political activities.
The complainant considers the procedure before the investigating judge to be complicated and costly.
Люди также переводят
With regard to article 2, paragraph 1, the complainant considers that the State party failed to take all effective measures to prevent him from being tortured.
The complainant considers that, in relation to the circumstances of his defence, there are no contradictions.
Copies of any documents that the Complainant considers to evidence its basis for relief, including web sites and domain name registrations.
The complainant considers that in any case the documents are official since they were issued by the authorities.
Concerning the conditions in which he was held, the complainant considers that the State party is taking refuge behind legal texts in order to dismiss the detailed information he provides.
The complainant considers that his complaint was unproductive since he had never been informed of any followup to it.
Based on these observations by the psychiatrist, the complainant considers it established that her mental health problems are caused by her treatment by the Turkish authorities in the past.
The complainant considers that the acts outlined herein constitute violations of article 2, paragraph 1, and articles 11, 12, 13 and 15 of the Convention.
Concerning the conditions in which he was held, the complainant considers that the State party is taking refuge behind legal texts in order to dismiss his plentiful, specific and substantiated evidence.
The complainant considers that, with regard to the alleged violation of article 16, the serious abuse inflicted on her was tantamount to torture.
Concerning the conditions in which he was held, and concerning visits, the complainant considers that the State party has once again confined itself to brief and general observations in response to his plentiful, specific and substantiated evidence.
The complainant considers also that the State party should, but did not, take into consideration that every time he was detained, he was tortured.
With respect to the alleged violation of article 14, the complainant considers that the State party has ignored his right to file a complaint, and has thus deprived him of his right to obtain compensation and the means for his rehabilitation.
The complainant considers that the ill-treatment to which he was subjected was intended to obtain his confession for one or more of these crimes.
Concerning the preventive arrangements for combating torture, the complainant considers that the State party has confined itself to listing an arsenal of laws and measures of an administrative and political nature which, he says, are not put into effect in any way.
The complainant considers that his life is also at risk outside prison, given the inadequate medical infrastructure in Haiti for the replacement of his pacemaker.
Moreover, the complainant considers that it is perfectly conceivable that K.H. had gone into hiding.
The complainant considers that the fact that Kurdish political activists and their families are subject to repression is confirmed by reports on the human rights situation in Turkey.
In relation to administrative supervision, the complainant considers that any punishment, including those provided for in the Tunisian Criminal Code, may be characterized as inhuman and degrading if the goal pursued is neither the"rehabilitation of the offender" nor his reconciliation with his social environment.
The complainant considers that many of the inconsistencies pointed out by the State party are linked to his lack of command of English and the PTSD from which he was already suffering at the time.
In relation to appeals before the courts, the complainant considers that the State party has confined itself to repeating the description of legal options open to victims set out in its previous submissions without responding to the last two sentences of paragraph 7.2 of the decision on admissibility.
The complainant considers that the seriousness of the misconduct has not been fully appreciated, while the"defendant" is dissatisfied by the failure to establish a finding through thorough and proper procedures.
The complainant considers that the murder he committed constitutes in itself a risk of being tortured if returned to Iran and that the fact that he has already been punished in the Netherlands is irrelevant.
The complainant considers that this proves beyond any doubt to what extent the officers concerned were sure that the beatings inflicted on Djilali Hanafi while in detention would inevitably kill him.
The complainant considers that these acts subjected him to pain and physical and mental suffering, constituting at the very least cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment as defined in article 16 of the Convention.