Примеры использования Council enlargement на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
That fully demonstrates the complexity of the question of Security Council enlargement.
Security Council enlargement is an integral part of the United Nations reform process.
Such reform must include, among other issues,the sensitive question of Security Council enlargement.
The issue of Security Council enlargement is of particular relevance to the Eastern European Group.
There has been insufficient progress in the debate on Council enlargement in the past 12 months.
Люди также переводят
Agreement on Security Council enlargement is a fundamental pillar of the United Nations reform process.
This is a right of Africa, irrespective of United Nations reform or Security Council enlargement.
Canada favours an approach to Council enlargement that would reflect the values that we all seek to promote.
Mr. RICHARDSON(United Kingdom):The United Kingdom welcomes this debate on Security Council enlargement.
Indeed, the United States could not agree to a Council enlargement that did not result in their permanent membership.
Let us hope that we will be able to recall this day as the day when we decisively relaunched the Security Council enlargement process.
My delegation believes that Council enlargement must be consistent with the sovereignty of States and equitable regional representation.
Our position has been echoed in the initiative on the draft resolution of the General Assembly to cut a decision on the categories of Council enlargement.
In addition, we believe that Security Council enlargement should be accompanied by a new understanding to limit the scope and the application of the veto.
The North Atlantic Treaty Organization(NATO) actions in the Kosovo crisis only strengthened our firm belief that there is no alternative to such an approach to Security Council enlargement.
Security Council enlargement and the cascade effect:enlargement of the permanent member category and its effects on the United Nations system.
At the same time, we hope that, along the lines ofthe mandate of the Working Group, Member States can bring about a resolution to the long-standing discussions on Security Council enlargement.
The issue of Security Council enlargement and the principle of equitable representation are of critical importance to the overall reform of the United Nations.
At the same time,it is necessary to avoid situations in which our work on other issues related to United Nations reform becomes hostage to the divergence of views on Security Council enlargement.
Security Council enlargement must not lead to an increase in the number of permanent seats granted to developed States to the detriment of developing countries.
This past year, Member States have been involved in discussing the composite text,which is essentially a compilation of all the various viewpoints regarding Security Council enlargement and modalities.
It should be our goal that a global decision on Security Council enlargement- and it must be a global decision- take into account regional views as much as possible.
They include a balancing representation between the developed and developing countries, achieving appropriate andequitable representation among regions and ensuring that Council enlargement does not curtail its ability to act promptly and decisively.
And deciding on, Security Council enlargement, we will send a clear signal that we will spare no effort in finalizing a comprehensive reform of the whole United Nations system.
Japan and Germany would both be valuable new permanent members whose contributions would strengthen the Council; indeed,I must emphasize that the United States could not agree to a Council enlargement that did not entail their permanent membership.
Too much time has been devoted to discussions on Security Council enlargement, the increase of the number of its permanent and non-permanent members, the change of procedures related to the right of veto and the adoption of joint decisions.
In that regard, we very much look forward to the outcome of the consultations being held among the Group of Four, brotherly African countries andother interested States to reach a common position that will make it possible to put together a joint draft resolution on Security Council enlargement.
We believe that Council enlargement is an integral part of the comprehensive United Nations reform agenda aimed at enabling it to effectively react to the challenges and opportunities of today's world, in the security, development and human rights fields alike.
Whether Democrats or Republicans, United States Senators-- like officials of our executive branch-- will be looking to see whether Security Council enlargement is part of a broader package of needed reforms and whether it makes the Council more or less effective in discharging its important duties.
The proposals made so far on Security Council enlargement have not managed to create a basis for consensus, although we all share, to a large degree, the same need and the same goal of a more effective and more accountable Security Council that is more representative of today's world.