Примеры использования Cross-border anticompetitive на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Only a handful of developing countries manage to regulate cross-border anticompetitive practices.
Cooperation in cross-border anticompetitive cases falls into two categories: formal and informal.
Ms. Tri Anggraini provided the Indonesian perspective on cross-border anticompetitive practices.
Cross-border anticompetitive practices may occur, inter alia, through international cartels and cross-border mergers.
Mr. Dieng shared his organization's experiences in fostering cooperation in cross-border anticompetitive cases.
Efforts to increase cooperation in handling cross-border anticompetitive cases are still being made in order to close the enforcement gap.
In this case, it is the methods being used by competition authorities to cooperate in dealing with cross-border anticompetitive cases.
Current examples of cross-border anticompetitive cases exist in the telecommunications, transport, distribution and construction sectors.
These challenges have been identified as the major hindrances to effective cooperation in dealing with cross-border anticompetitive cases.
It is also a fact that cooperation in dealing with cross-border anticompetitive cases has yielded positive results.
Competition authorities are increasingly being faced with the need to enforce competition policy domestically and to deal with cross-border anticompetitive practices.
Over the years,cooperation tools for dealing with cross-border anticompetitive cases have evolved, establishing the base for the introduction of different systems.
However, developing and transition economies face many challenges in dealing with these cross-border anticompetitive practices.
The UNCTAD secretariat presented a background study on cross-border anticompetitive practices and the challenges for developing countries and economies in transition.
The European Competition Network(ECN)is one of the most successful arrangements in dealing with cross-border anticompetitive practices.
As a response to challenges posed by cross-border anticompetitive practices, it was proposed during the thirteenth session of the Intergovernmental Group of Experts that enforcement capabilities be aggregated.
Also, it shows the increasing need for competition law at the regional orinternational level in tackling cross-border anticompetitive effects.
Many delegates emphasized the importance of international cooperation in dealing with cross-border anticompetitive practices and provided examples where international cooperation was of great value.
Difficulties of developing countries in enforcing competition laws, including in cases with international elements, andthe application of competition laws to cross-border anticompetitive practices;
This study reviews the challenges that competition agencies face in dealing with cross-border anticompetitive cases and in putting in place effective cooperation mechanisms.
This report reviews competition provisions in such agreements, the cooperation mechanisms contained in them andwhat is happening on the ground in practical terms of resolving cross-border anticompetitive cases.
This report reviews the challenges faced by young competition agencies in dealing with both domestic and cross-border anticompetitive cases and in putting in place effective cooperation mechanisms.
COMESA established a framework for dealing with cross-border anticompetitive issues through the adoption of its regional competition policy and law in the form of the Competition Rules and Regulations(CRRs) in 2004.
Four manuals on common methodologies for economic analysis of country cases with the aim of facilitating the prosecution of cross-border anticompetitive practices were prepared under COMPAL.
As a response to challenges posed by cross-border anticompetitive practices, he proposed aggregating enforcement capabilities; one way to achieve this could be through the creation of a"focused-multinational information sharing platform.
Article 55 of the COMESA Treaty provides for the development of regional competition rules to ensure that cross-border anticompetitive practices do not erode the benefits derived from integration.
Mr. Mamhare reported that the Southern African Development Community had a legal framework for trade calling on member States to cooperate at the pre-investigation stage when dealing with cases relating to cross-border anticompetitive behaviour.
In the absence of such regional cooperation andstatutes to deal with cross-border anticompetitive practices, such cases may go unresolved in many of the countries which are distorting the operations of free and competitive markets.
The forgoing sections show that cooperation within the context of the European Union and its member States as well asthe United States of America and its partners have been successful in dealing with cross-border anticompetitive cases, and to some extent the North- North cooperation arrangements.
Approximately 30 cases of cross-border anticompetitive practices have been analysed, and the current report includes the experience of 11 examples of cooperation in case initiation, resolution and investigations between competition authorities, sector-specific regulators and other government agencies.