Примеры использования Declare that it recognizes на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Art. 14.1: A State Party may at any time declare that it recognizes the competence of the Committee to receive and consider communications.
A State can also declare that it recognizes the right of national non-governmental organizations within its jurisdiction and that have particular competence in the matters governed by the Charter to lodge complaints against it. .
A State party may at any time declare that it recognizes the competence of the Committee to receive and consider communications from individuals or groups of individuals within its jurisdiction claiming to be victims of a violation by that State party of any of the rights set forth in this Convention.
A State Party may, upon depositing its instrument of ratification or accession to this Convention, orat any subsequent time, declare that it recognizes as binding, ipso facto, and not requiring special agreement, the jurisdiction of the Court on all matters relating to the interpretation or application of this Convention.
Article 12 provides that a State party may declare that it recognizes the competence of the Committee to receive and consider communications in which a State party claims that another State party is not fulfilling its obligations under the Convention or the first two Optional Protocols thereto;
Any State Party may, when it deposits its instrument of ratification of or adherence to this Convention, orat any later time, declare that it recognizes the competence of the Commission to receive and examine communications in which a State Party alleges that another State Party has committed a violation of a human right set forth in this Convention.
A High Contracting Party may at any time declare that it recognizes ipso facto and without special agreement, in relation to any other High Contracting Party accepting the same obligation, the competence of the Compliance Committee(hereinafter referred to as"the Committee"), established under this Article, in all matters related to the compliance with the Convention and its annexed Protocols as described hereinafter.
Each State party may, at the time of signature orratification of the present Protocol or accession thereto, declare that it recognizes the competence of the Committee to receive and consider collective communications as provided for in the present article in respect of the rights set forth in some or all of the instruments listed in paragraph 2.
Article 13 stipulates that a State party may declare that it recognizes the competence of the Committee to conduct inquiries into grave and systematic violations of the Convention or the first two Optional Protocols thereto.
Any State Party may also, at the time of ratification or accession to the present Protocol, orat any moment thereafter, declare that it recognizes the right of any representative national nongovernmental organization within its jurisdiction, which has particular competence in the matters covered by the Covenant, to submit collective communications against it. .
A State party to the present Protocol may, at any time, declare that it recognizes the competence of the Committee to receive and consider communications in which a State party claims that another State party is not fulfilling its obligations under.
Article 11 stipulates that a State party may declare that it recognizes the competences of the Committee to conduct inquiries into grave and systematic violations of the Covenant.
A State Party to this Convention may at any time declare that it recognizes the competence of the Committee to receive and consider communications in which a State Party claims that another State Party is not fulfilling its obligations under this Convention.
The State Party may,at the time of ratification or thereafter, declare that it recognizes the competence of the Committee to receive and consider communications from or on behalf of individuals subject to its jurisdiction who claim to be victims of a violation of the provisions of this instrument.
Article 10 of the Optional Protocol provides that a State party may declare that it recognizes the competence of the Committee to receive and consider communications to the effect that a State party claims that another State party is not fulfilling its obligations under the Covenant;
A State party to the present Protocol may, at any time, declare that it recognizes the competence of the Committee to receive and consider communications in which a State party claims that another State party is not fulfilling its obligations under any of the following instruments to which the State is a party.
A State party may at the time of ratification of this Convention orat any time afterwards declare that it recognizes the competence of the Committee to receive and consider communications from or on behalf of individuals subject to its jurisdiction claiming to be victims of a violation by this State party of provisions of this Convention.
In addition, pursuant to article 22 of the Convention, a State party to the Convention may at any time declare that it recognizes the competence of the Committee to receive and consider communications from or on behalf of individuals subject to its jurisdiction who claim to be victims of a violation by a State party of the provisions of the Convention.
Any State party may also, at the time of ratification or accession to the present Protocol, orat any time thereafter, declare that it recognizes the right of any national non-governmental organization within its jurisdiction, which has particular competence in the matters covered by the Convention and the Optional Protocols thereto, to submit collective communications as provided for in paragraph 1 of the present article.
Lithuania declared that it recognizes ipso facto and without special agreement the competence of the International Humanitarian Fact-Finding Commission according to article 90 of Additional Protocol I to the Geneva Conventions.
In 1966, Sweden declared that it recognized the jurisdiction of the European Court of Human Rights to examine complaints.
Lithuania declared that it recognized ipso facto and without special agreement the competence of the International Fact-Finding Commission in accordance with article 90 of Protocol I.
The Government of Canada declares that it recognizes the competence of the Committee against Torture, pursuant to article 21 of the Convention, to receive and consider communications to the effect that a State Party claims that another State Party is not fulfilling its obligations under this Convention.
The Government of the Kingdom of the Netherlands hereby declares that it recognizes the competence of the Committee against Torture… to receive and consider communications to the effect that another State Party claims that the Kingdom is not fulfilling its obligations under this Convention.
The Government of Tunisia declares that it recognizes the competence of the Committee against Torture provided for in article 17 of the Convention to receive communications pursuant to articles 21 and 22, thereby withdrawing any reservation made on Tunisia's behalf in this connection.
In 1991, Sweden declared that it recognized, without further agreement, the competence of the Fact-Finding Commission provided for in article 90 of Additional Protocol I. It was a great satisfaction to note the coming into operation of this Commission in 1992.
Regarding article 14 of the Convention,under which a State party could at any time declare that it recognized the competence of the Committee to receive and consider individual communications, unlike other members of the Committee, he believed that such a declaration was not of great importance.
III."The Government of Nicaragua declares that it recognizes the competence of the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights to receive and examine communications in which a State Party alleges that another State Party has committed a violation of a human right set forth in the Convention, as provided in Article 45 thereof.
The Government of Australia hereby declares that it recognizes, for and on behalf of Australia, the competence of the Committee to receive and consider communications from individuals or groups of individuals within its jurisdiction claiming to be victims of a violation by Australia of any of the rights set forth in the aforesaid Convention.