Примеры использования Definition of damage на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Definition of damage and compensation.
Together, they constitute the essential elements inclusive in a definition of damage to the environment.
The definition of damage is crucial for the purposes of the present draft principles.
Some delegations noted that the threshold of"significant" in the definition of damage was unnecessary and not consistent with several liability regimes.
The definition of damage eligible for compensation was not a well-settled matter.
While pleasing one side, those States that would prefer a more traditional,restrictive definition of damage would in turn have difficulties in taking steps to ratify such instruments.
The definition of damage eligible for compensation as we have seen above is not a well-settled matter.
This meaning is linked to and may be deduced from the definition of damage in draft principle 2, which includes damage to persons, property or the environment.
The definition of damage was also crucial, since its elements were relevant in establishing the basis for a claim.
Among other issues, questions have been raisedat various stages of the negotiations about the scope of application of civil liability regimes, including the definition of damage.
On the definition of damage, while it was agreed that it must meet certain conditions, different variations were favoured.
In its submission, the United States of America recognised that any liability andredress rules for damage to biodiversity need to have a clear definition of damage.
A clear definition of damage to biodiversity would be central to the application of any liability and redress rules.
His delegation was pleased with the broad scope of draft principle 2 andsupported the inclusion of loss or damage by impairment of the environment in the definition of damage.
Another element of a definition of damage to biodiversity could be that the change observed must be adverse or negative.
Following the Chernobyl nuclear disaster in 1986,there was an increased demand within IAEA to revise the definition of damage and enhance the amount of compensation under the 1963 Vienna Convention.
The definition of damage is- as far as the damage by impairment of the environment is concerned- broader than in Swiss domestic law. law.
Factors which militated against obtaining full and complete compensation included the following:problems with the definition of damage; difficulties of proof of loss; problems of the applicable law, limitations on the operator's liability as well as limitations within which contributory and supplementary funding mechanisms operated.
The definition of damage or harm considered by the Commission only referred to loss of persons and property and environment within national jurisdiction.
India was concerned about the enlarged scope of the draft text which sought to incorporate some elements in the definition of damage, such as Principle 2, which defined the term"damage" as including significant loss caused to the environment, and Principle 2(a)(iii), which referred to loss or damage by impairment of the environment.
The definition of damage reflected the current practice followed in treaties and domestic law of including damage to persons, property and the environment.
Several issues have been under consideration with some specific proposals addressing such questions as scope of application, the definition of damage(which, it was suggested should be"significant and lasting"), standard of liability, exemptions and limits, quantum of damages, duty to take measures of response and restoration, State responsibility and dispute settlement.
The definition of damage covers loss of life or personal injury; loss or damage to property; loss or damage by contamination of the environment and costs of preventive measures.
Among the general considerations identified by the groups were the need to take into account the time-lag between release of POPs and the manifestation of damage; the variety of POPs sources and their cumulative effects; the difficulties in establishing a causal link between a particular source anda specific damage; the definition of damage caused by POPs and who is to be regarded as having suffered damage; and whether the activities were undertaken, or the effects felt, by States or by individuals.
It has broadened both the definition of damages in support of a request for divorce and the means by which such damages can be proved.
The broad definition of damage to include damage to persons, property and environment per se within the national jurisdiction also elicited favourable comments.
There appears therefore to be a good case for expanding the definition of damage as noted above to cover damage to the environment and natural resources in areas beyond national jurisdiction.
The definition of damage, sometimes a lack of the required proof of loss and applicable law, in addition to the limitations of the operator's liability and limitations within which contributory and supplementary funding mechanisms operate would militate against the possibility of obtaining such full and complete compensation.
In this context, some delegations welcomed the fact that the definition of damage covered both consequential economic loss and pure economic loss, including loss of income directly deriving from an economic interest in any use of the environment.
The definition of damage suggested in principle 2, subparagraph(a), as read with the definition of environment in principle 2, subparagraph(c), goes beyond the definition mostly employed, which is generally confined to damage to persons and property.